PSYC - Ch 4 Flashcards

1
Q

Research Ethics - Responsibility Towards

A

Participants - ensure welfare, dignity, safety of participants (human and non-human)

Science - ensure public reports of research are accurate and honest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Belmont Report

A

Ethical principals identified by the national commission

  • Respect for person (autonomy)
  • Beneficence
  • Justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research Ethics Historical Roots

A

Nuremburg Trials - Trial for experiments performed on prisoners in Nazi camps.

Led to the Nuremberg Code - set of 10 guidelines for ethical treatment of humans in research

Milgram - Electric Shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) - Canada

A

Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans

  • Respect for Persons
  • Concern for Welfare (beneficence)
  • Justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

No Harm

A

Protection from physical and psychological harm

Risks identified, minimized, justified

Participants informed of the risks

Post-experiment assistance offered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Informed Consent

A

Participants be informed of what will be done to them and the purpose of the study

Voluntary/not coerced participation

Right to withdraw anytime

Children & vulnerable populations - assent from participants & consent from guardians.

Indigenous populations - consent must be sought from gatekeepers of those communities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Deception

A

Passive deception (omission) - leave out info

Active deception (commission) - alter information

Participants must be debriefed

Placebo - inform participants they may or may not be in that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anonymity

A

Data not allowed to be shared for the identification of an individual

Assigne numbers, pseudonyms

Group data is reported, not individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confidentiality

A

Only research team can assess data

Password protection, encryption, locked cabinets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Public Info and Consent

A

Research that relies exclusively on publicly available information does not require consent when:

  • the info is legally accessible to
    public and protected by law
  • the info is publicly accessible and no reasonable expectation of privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Observation & Consent

A

Consent is not required for the observation of people in public spaces where:

  • there is no intervention staged by the researcher, or direct interaction with the individuals or groups;
  • there is no reasonable expectation of privacy
  • dissemination of research results does not allow identification of specific individuals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Internet and Consent

A

Can we treat info as public?

Two major problems:

  • Expectation of privacy
  • Persistence & traceability of quotes

Informed consent is required when there is an expectation of privacy.

What is private? Subscription sites? Privacy depends on each group, can sometime be found in FAQs

  • Members of internet communities do not
    expect to be research subjects - will likely see data collection as an invasion of privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Internet and Traceability

A

How to protect anonymity when quotes are permanent and traceable?

Do not identify the name of the online community or provide the website address

Anonymise and paraphrase quotations + use search engines to ensure they are not traceable

Use composite instead of direct quotes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why do animal research

A

To learn more about animals

To learn more about humans

To conduct research impossible to do with humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Animal Ethics - Historical Roots

A

Medical Research Council mandated an investigation into the care and use of experimental animals in Canada

Created Canadian Council for Animal Care (1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anomal Ethics - Three Rs

A

Replacing/Avoiding animals

Reducing # of animals

Refining care/procedures to minimize pain and distress

17
Q

Animal Ethics - Guidelines

A

Proper care, treatment, maintenance

Handlers must be properly trained (CCAC)

18
Q

Ethics Committees

A

All researchers must apply to a research ethics committee for permission/approval

Committees exist in universities and funding agencies.

19
Q

Scientific Integrity

A

Error vs Fraud (erratum/retraction)

Data fabrication/falsification of findings

Plagiarism

Ghost-writing/fake peer review

Safeguards = replication, peer review & watchdogs (retraction watch - blog started in 2010 to keep track of bad science - 50% due to fabrication/falsification/plagiarism) - 10% due to forged authorship, fake peer review, no ethics approval)

20
Q

Wakefield Study Flaws - MMR vaccine leads to autism

A
  • 12 children in the study; not randomly selected but recruited through anti-MMR vaccine campaigners
  • researcher hired by lawyers for families suing MMR vaccine maker
  • she fabricated findings and altered data to suit hypothesis
  • claimed children were ”normal” prior to vaccine; 5 had prior developmental problems.
  • Reported that 9 children developed regressive autism; only 1 did.
  • For these 9 children changed gut examination results from “unremarkable” to “non-specific colitis”.
  • For all 12 children, case descriptions contradict medical records and parent accounts.