PSY311 5. Parenting Flashcards

1
Q

What is a Family?

A

• Two or more people related by birth, marriage,
adoption, or choice
• Have emotional ties and responsibilities to one
another
• Important for successful parenting:
– Family structure?
üResources (e.g., economic, social support)
üQuality of parent-child interactions/relationships
üEmotional climate and stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a Family?

A

-strong evidence that family structure not determinant of life consequences
there is research that children with 2 parents tend to show better consequences, but it’s more because of other parenting factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a Family?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a Family?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a Family?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Socialization?

A

• Process of helping children internalize the
attitudes, values, beliefs, and behaviors of the
larger society
– Controls and regulates children’s behavior
– Promotes children’s personal growth
– Perpetuates the social order
• Family as the main agent of socialization
• Family as a social system
• Bidirectional influences!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Socialization?

A

-child has incorporated ideas into own beliefs and values
internalization*
teaches them how to control behaviour
helps maintain human society
although there are other agents such as school and peers, the most consistent and important agent is the family, specifically the parents
family system: child lives within system
family is bigger than sum of its parts
network of reciprocal relationships that are constantly evolving
affected by the community
bidirectional and circular relationship: parents relationship, parenting, infants behaviour and development
every person in the family is affected and affects other members
naive to focus only on mother child relationship to explain development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Socialization?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Socialization?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Socialization?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A
Psychodynamic Model
• Emphasis on nurturance
• Child’s psychosexual, psychosocial,
and personality development
influenced by relationship between
mother and child
• Parents have the responsibility of
constraining children’s instinctual
impulses, child develops selfcontrol
• Grouped parenting practices into
broader categories (parenting
attitudes) on the basis of their
potential to alter emotional
processes
• Schaefer’s (1959) circumplex model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-parents must help child control the id until the child has self-control
e.g. circumplex model
more concerned with attitudes (cognitions + ideas)

behaviourist
concerned with how children learned through conditioning
ferberation when a baby cries - don’t always go to it
more concerned with parenting behaviours
easier to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A
Learning (Behaviorist) Model
• Emphasis on control
• Child’s development “shaped” by
parental reinforcement of good
behavior and punishment of bad
behavior
• Watson – parents should refrain
from kissing, cuddling, and holding
infants so that they don’t develop
“bad habits” (e.g., clinging to
parents, protesting separation)
• Categorized parenting style
according to behavior patterns
(parenting practices)
• Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957)
child-rearing patterns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Early Theories of Socialization

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Schaefer’s (1959) Circumplex Model of Maternal Behavior Concepts

A
AUTONOMY
LOVE
CONTROL
Freedom
Democratic
Cooperative
Accepting
Detached
Indifferent
Neglecting
Rejecting
Demanding
antagonistic
Authoritarian
dictatorial Possessive
Over
indulgent
Protective
indulgent
Over
protective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Schaefer’s (1959) Circumplex Model of Maternal Behavior Concepts

A

-at this time, not much research
watched mothers with children and noted parenting behaviour they displayed
took behaviours and factor analyzed them
fit nicely into 4 dimensions - parenting attitudes
orthogonal - not correlated with one another
conceptually distinct dimensions
mapped behaviours he observed on dimensions
e.g. democratic - 60% and 85% autonomy
behaviour concept that shows an attitude of both autonomy and love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Schaefer’s (1959) Circumplex Model of Maternal Behavior Concepts

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Schaefer’s (1959) Circumplex Model of Maternal Behavior Concepts

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing

A
Mothers’ parenting patterns
Permissiveness
/strictness
Family
adjustment
Relationship
warmth
Responsible
child-training
orientation
Aggressiveness
/punitiveness
Perception of
husband
Orientation
toward child
well-being
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing

A

Control
Permissiveness/
strictness
Compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing

A

-landmark publication - study of several hundred middle class parents
Boston 1950s
first detailed analysis on parenting discipline and its link to child behaviour
did a factor analysis - 7 factors of parenting patterns
some are more attitudes e.g. perception of husbands, but it would play out in behaviours
higher level ways of organizing practices
e.g. permissiveness/strictness - sanctions on aggression, rules on common living areas, physical punishment or tolerance on certain behaviours
relationship warmth - warmth in mother child relationship had the most pervasive influence on young children’s development
e.g. fondness, admiration, enjoyment
expressed by nurturance, positive affect
similar to Schafer’s dimension of love vs hostility - conceptualized it as continuum
Sears et al. conceptualized it was more behaviour
Schafer criticized that it was hard to find relationships between practices
e.g. warmth and orientation toward child well-being
but measuring attitudes can have limited usefulness to researchers
this is more useful because parenting processes mediate the process between attitudes and developmental consequences
you would need to know the parenting behaviours displayed that lead to compliance to reflect the attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Sears, Maccoby, & Levin’s (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Dimensions of Parenting Style in Early Empirical Research

A
1939
Symonds
Acceptance Rejection
Dominance Submission
1955
Baldwin
Warmth Hostility
Detachment Involvement
1959
Schaefer
Love Hostility
Autonomy Control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Dimensions of Parenting Style in Early Empirical Research

A
1957
Sears, Maccoby, & Levin
Warmth!
Permissiveness Strictness
1964
Becker
Warmth Hostility
Permissiveness Strictness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Dimensions of Parenting Style in Early Empirical Research

A

dimensional heuristics in how parental socialization shaped development
WWII - Lewin - interested in group atmosphere
forced boys to work under authoritarian, democratic, and laissez faire leadership - found those under democratic were more productive
set stage for Baldwin’s research
Home visits - democratic family system
warm democracy - affectionate and more empathy for child
associated with better development outcome
scientific democracy - detachment and empirical thinking for child-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Dimensions of Parenting Style in Early Empirical Research

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Baumrind’s (1967; 1971) Typology of Parenting Styles

A

① Authoritarian parenting – Controlling and restrictive pattern – Many demands/rules, expect obedience, punitive and forceful
tactics, no explanations, no sensitivity to child’s view
② Authoritative parenting – Controlling but flexible pattern – Many (reasonable) demands, provide rationales, responsive
to child’s view, democratic
③ Permissive parenting – Accepting but lax pattern – Few demands, child has free expression of feelings/impulses,
poor monitoring of child’s activities, lack of follow-through
with punishments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Baumrind’s (1967; 1971) Typology of Parenting Styles

A

-how ppl used parental control
based on previous models - interested in Baldwin’s democratic warmth
parents should be less strict and more willing to express unconditional love
convinced that authoritarian and permissive parenting no matter how much love was given would result in less optimal child outcome
studied how happy the child was, how well they did in school
1. authoritarian:
e.g. corpal punishment
2. authoritative:
still controlling - firm limits, high expectations, but more flexible
e.g. negotiate fair punishment
while they are less strict, they place control and limits at just as high of a level as authoritarian parenting
3. permissive parenting
few demands, not a lot of expectations
inconsistent discipline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Baumrind’s (1967; 1971) Typology of Parenting Styles

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Baumrind’s (1967; 1971) Typology of Parenting Styles

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Baumrind’s (1967; 1971) Typology of Parenting Styles

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

• Specified one broad parenting function (control) and
expanded on parenting behaviors within that single domain
• Did not try to organize control linearly from high to low,
instead distinguished among three qualitatively different types
• Used a configurational approach to define parenting style -
the influence of any one aspect of parenting is dependent on
the configuration of all other aspects – Parents who practice a specific type (e.g., authoritarian) also tend
to differ along other dimensions (e.g., poor communication, less
nurturant)
– More ecologically valid (grounded in naturally occurring parenting
styles)
• Saw the socialization process as dynamic – The parenting style used actually alters how open children are to
parents’ attempts to socialize them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

-looked only at control
not on a continuum, but more categorical
configurational approach: emphasize more holistic process
not just what researchers thought was important to look at in parenting
set clear expectations which over time allows child to get better at recognizing appropriate behaviour
fosters different schemas of how world works
more open to socialization and parents’ influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

-

42
Q

How is Baumrind’s Typology Different?

A

-

43
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A
Parenting style @
age 4
Outcomes @ age 9 Outcomes @ age 15
Authoritative High cognitive and social
competences
High self-esteem, excellent social skills,
strong moral/prosocial concern, high
academic achievement
Authoritarian Average cognitive and
social competencies
Average academic performance and
social skills, more conforming than
adolescents of permissive parents
Permissive Low cognitive and social
competencies
Poor self-control and academic
performance, more drug use
44
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

-revolutionary at the time to think that parenting styles influence on outcome

45
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

-

46
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

In general, authoritative parenting is associated with positive
social and emotional outcomes in children and adolescents.
This is true for many diverse racial and ethic groups.

47
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

-

48
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

-

49
Q

Parenting Style and Developmental Outcomes

A

-

50
Q

Lewis’s (1981) Critique of Baumrind

A

• Why should strong external control such as that used by
authoritative parents induce children to internalize their
parents’ values, when attribution theory suggests that
strong external control should undermine internalization?
– Reinterpreted findings as attributable to authoritative
parents’ openness to bidirectional communication
– Parenting typologies capture a configuration of parenting
practices
• Hard to know what aspect of parenting affects which developmental
outcomes
• Much of what we know about how parenting style affects
child development is speculative rather than empirically
grounded

51
Q

Lewis’s (1981) Critique of Baumrind

A

-it doesn’t make sense for children to internalize values that they attribute to parent’s values that are trying to be imposed on them
internalization works when children think they’ve developed their own values and beliefs
more because they are open to bidirectional communication and making adjustments based on thought and feelings
not just about control
configuration - lots of factors that are involved in 1 typology e.g. maybe authoritative parents are more interpersonally sensitive
e.g. lots of parenting behaviours involved in one typology
why are children better socializers? is it because parents talk to them more, is it more democratic?
we don’t really know why 1 parenting style produces 1 specific outcome because family systems are so complex

52
Q

Lewis’s (1981) Critique of Baumrind

A

-

53
Q

Lewis’s (1981) Critique of Baumrind

A

-

54
Q

Lewis’s (1981) Critique of Baumrind

A

-

55
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A
Accepting/
Responsive
Rejecting/
Unresponsive
Demanding/
Controlling
Undemanding/
Permissive
56
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A

Uninvolved parenting
– Extremely lax and undemanding pattern
– Active rejection or no time/energy to devote to parenting
– Children are aggressive, become rebellious adolescents who
lack motivation and are prone to delinquency

57
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A

-fit Baumrind styles onto the dimensions
authoritative: high responsive + controlling
authoritarian: high demanding, high rejecting
2 distinct patterns of permissive:
indulgent - high accepting, permissive
uninvolved - high rejecting, permissive
not found in Baumrind’s sample - middle class
Maccoby and Martin’s sample - less homogenous sample

58
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A

-

59
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A

-

60
Q

Maccoby and Martin’s (1983) Two-Dimensional Framework

A

-

61
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A

• Parenting style – “a constellation of attitudes toward the child
that are communicated to the child and create an emotional
climate in which parents’ behaviors are expressed”
• Parenting practice – “behaviors defined by specific content and socialization goals”

62
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A
Parental goals/values Child outcome
Parenting style
Parenting practice
Child’s willingness to
be socialized
Academic achievement
Authoritative
School involvement Academic achievement
“I know that school is
important to my
parents, and I want to
make them proud”
63
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A

practice occurs in context of parenting style
each of these attributes (style + practice) influence outcome through different pathways
practice thought to be mechanism through which parents express goals and values to child
style more indirect route: style moderates how well parenting practice works on affecting child outcome
influences child’s personality and willingness to be socialized, which in turn also moderates how well parenting practice works on affecting child outcome
e.g. more involved parents have children with higher academic achievement
parental goal: academic achievement
practice: school involvement
style: authoritative
authoritative parents discuss course selection
school involvement becomes more useful
while authoritarian parenting might make child more resistant which in turn makes school involvement less influential over outcome

64
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A

-

65
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A

-

66
Q

Parenting Style as Context - Darling and Steinberg (1993)

A

-

67
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A
-Psychological Control
• Attempts to influence behavior
through discipline and
monitoring – Set reasonable rules – Keep track of child and regulate
activities
– Do not threaten autonomy
• Sensitive to needs of child • Children display less
externalizing problems (e.g.,
drug use, truancy, antisocial
behavior)
Behavioral Control
• Attempts to influence behavior
through emotions – Guilt induction – Withdrawal of love – Intrusiveness
• Insensitive to needs of child • Children display more
internalizing problems (e.g.,
anxiety, depression), low selfesteem
(Barber et al., 2006)
68
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A

-psychological:
more manipulative form of control
can be damaging to children

behavioural:
the type we have talked about

not a continuum

69
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A

-

70
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A

-

71
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A

-

72
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Control”

A

-

73
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A
Responsiveness to Distress • How the parent reacts when
the child is upset – Insensitive responses (hostility,
dismissing, or distress) or
sensitive responses
(comforting and helping)
• Related to children’s
regulation of negative
emotion
• Related to children’s
empathy and prosocial
behavior
Warmth • Expression of positive affect,
affection, and admiration
toward the child
• Related to children’s
regulation of positive
emotion
• Related to boys’ peer group
acceptance
74
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-main problem from research standpoint: hard to know which parenting practices is driving correlation with positive outcome
positive parenting may be conceptualized differently
responsiveness to distress:
significantly related to regulation of negative emotions
e.g. not as upset as easily, calm down more easily
not predictive of peer group acceptance

these practices are distinct and are associated with different outcomes
make unique contributions to outcomes and are not interchangeable constructs

75
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-

76
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-

77
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-

78
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-

79
Q

Modern Parenting Research Clarifying “Positive Parenting”

A

-

80
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A

• Differential susceptibility – children vary in the extent to
which they are affected by parenting (Pluess & Belsky, 2010)
• Infants with difficult temperaments are disproportionately
susceptible to parenting
– Do better with “good” parenting but also do worse with
“bad” parenting

81
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A
infants with difficult temperaments are more moderated by parenting
e.g. effortful control - high can inhibit automatic response and can perform a different response
inconsistent discipline (permissive parenting)
linked to delinquency and externalizing problems
children with high effortful control exhibited low externalizing behaviour regardless of levels of inconsistent discipline
children with low effortful control exhibited significant levels of change in externalizing behaviour based on level of inconsistent discipline
temperament by parenting interaction - allows us to give specific interventions and think of parenting process as more complex
e.g. polymorphism of DRD4 gene - looking at interacting with maternal sensitivity
gene by interaction graph
children with 7+ who had insensitive mothers showed much higher externalizing problems than those with highly sensitive mothers
children without 7+ did not change in externalizing behaviour levels in levels of sensitivity
82
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A

-

83
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A

-

84
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A

-

85
Q

Modern Parenting Research Differential Susceptibility

A

-

86
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

Beyond the middle-class families
– Low SES parents stress obedience, are more restrictive,
use less reasoning, and show less affection and warmth
• May be socializing skills necessary to succeed in blue-collar work
• Beyond Caucasian families
– Use of spanking and other power assertive disciplinary
techniques in African-American families does not have the
same negative effects as with European American children
– Asian American parents tend to be highly authoritarian
with regard to learning, but their children perform as well
academically as (or better than) European American
children who have authoritative parents
• Cultural normativeness influences the way parenting practices are
viewed by children

87
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

perhaps its more adaptive to grow up in authoritarian style when they will end up in jobs that it is more useful
children of asian american parents performed academically better despite authoritarian style
e.g. in asian american families - culturally normative for parents to be strict about school performance so they saw it as normal - perceived parenting practice as ok
child’s receptiveness is important in moderating how well practices will work

88
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

=

89
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

=

90
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

-

91
Q

Modern Parenting Research Cultural Context

A

-

92
Q

Family Distress Model - Conger et al. (1992)

A
Low income
Job loss
Family
economic
distress
Unstable
employment
Debt CONDUCT
AND
ADJUSTMENT
PROBLEMS
Child
emotional
reactivity
Child
emotional
insecurity
Uninvolved
parenting
Father
depression
Mother
depression
Marital
conflict
93
Q

Family Distress Model - Conger et al. (1992)

A

-

94
Q

Family Distress Model - Conger et al. (1992)

A

-

95
Q

Family Distress Model - Conger et al. (1992)

A

-

96
Q

Family Distress Model - Conger et al. (1992)

A

-

97
Q

The Trouble with Evan

A

-

98
Q

The Trouble with Evan

A

-

99
Q

The Trouble with Evan

A

-

100
Q

The Trouble with Evan

A

-

101
Q

The Trouble with Evan

A

-