Property Offences Flashcards
What is the main statute for property offences?
Theft Act 1968
Define Theft - as per the statute
s. 1(1) Theft Act 1968: a person is guilty of theft is he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
Actus Reus of Theft
(a) in the appropriation of
(b) property
(c) belonging to another
Define ‘appropriation’
An incorrect act
s. 3 Theft Act 1968
Owner’s consent is irrelevant
Define ‘property’ - as per the statute
s. 4(1) Theft Act 1968: includes money and all other property, real or personal including things in action and other intangible property.
s. 4(2) - (4): extends the definition of property including land, wild plants, etc
What are the exceptions to the definition of property
1) Electricity: not property but has a special offence under s. 13 Theft Act 1968
2) Information: Oxford v Moss [1979] - exam information / secrets not property but the paper is
3) Services: Failure to pay for service is not theft (but a Fraud Offence)
4) Bodies: R v Kelly [1998] - a corpse is not property unless it is embalmed or otherwise treated
Define Actus Reus of Theft - Belonging to another - as per the statute
s. 5(1) Theft Act 1968: property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having any proprietary right or interest (not being an equitable interest arising only from an agreement to transfer or grant an interest)
Mens Rea of Theft
(1) ‘dishonest’ appropriation with the
(2) ‘intention to permanently deprive’
When is D not dishonest - as per the statute
s. 2 Theft Act 1968
(1) A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest -
(a) if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or a third person; or
(b) if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c) (except where the property cam to him as a trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
What statute do you use if an intention to deprive is not obvious
s. 6 Theft Act 1968
Examples of activities that show an intention to permanently deprive
1) Ransoming or selling back property
2) Replacing with seminal property
3) Removing value from the property
4) Abandoning the property
5) ‘Conditional intent’ is NOW sufficient for theft
6) Risking the property
Test for Dishonesty
Ghosh: OLD LAW
Ivey v Genting Casinos IKSC [2017]:
(a) What was the actual state of D’s knowledge or belief as to the facts?
(b) in the context of (a), was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people?
Define Robbery - as per the statute
s. 8(1) Theft Act 1968: A person if guilty of robbery if he steals (=theft), an immediately before or at the time of doing so and in order to do so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force.
If no theft, then no robbery
Define Burglary - as per the statute
s. 9 Theft Act 1968: 2 type of burglary
(1) A person is guilty of burglary if -
(a) he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser and with intent to commit [just intent; no need for full theft / other full offence] any such offence as is mentioned in (2)
(b) having interest any building or part of a building as a trespasser he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm [needs full offence or attempt]
Actus Reus of Burglary
Entering a building or any part of a building as a trespasser