Sexual Offences Flashcards
Define ‘Rape’ - as per the statute
s. 1 SOA 2003 - (1) A person (A) commits an offence if -
(a) he intentionally penetrated the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
Actus Reus of Rape
Conduct Element:
1) Penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with his penis. This is a continuing act (V can withdraw at any point and with the non-fulfilment of a condition)
Circumstance Element:
2) B does not consent (question of B’s subjective state of mind)
Mens Rea of Rape
1) Intentional penetration
2) A does not reasonably believe in B’s consent (Objective) = intends V to lack consent, knows V does not consent, reckless as to consent
Difference between AR Consent and MR Consent in regard to SOA
AR Consent: ‘V does not consent’ = question of fact for the jury to decide based on V’s subjective state of mine
MR Consent: ‘D does not reasonably believe V consents’ = objective test
How to determine consent in SOA
1) s. 76 = Conclusive presumptions about consent (relevant to AR and MR)
2) s. 75 = Rebuttal presumptions about consent (relevant to AR and MR)
3) s. 74 = Definition of consent (relevant to AR and MR)
Define ‘Assault by Penetration’ - as per the statute
s. 2 SOA 2003: (1) A person (A) commit an offence if -
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of another person (B) with a part of his body or anything else
(b) the penetration is sexual
(c) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents
Max. penalty - Life
Define ‘sexual assault’ - as per the statute
s. 3 SOA 2003: (1) A person (A) commits an offence if -
(a) he intentionally touches another person (B)
(b) the touching is sexual
(c) B does not consent to the touching
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents
Summary Conviction = 6 months
Conviction on Indictment = 10 years
Requires actual contact, not just a threat / far of contact
Define “Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent” - as per the statute
s. 4 SOA 2003: (1) A person (A) commits an offence if -
(a) he intentionally causes another person (B) to engage in an activity (=RESULT)
(b) the activity is sexual
(c) B does not consent to engaging in the activity
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents
What activity does a s. 4 SOA 2003 offence involve
s .4(4) SOA 2003:
(a) penetration of B’s anus or vagina
(b) penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis
(c) penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else
(d) penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis
Definition of ‘sexual’ - as per the statute
s. 78 SOA 2003 (part of AR only): Penetration, touching or any other activity is sexual if a reasonable person would consider that -
(a) whatever its circumstances or any person’s purpose in relation to it, it is because of its sexual nature, or
(b) because of its nature it maybe sexual and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is sexual.
Is there any test to determine whether an act was sexual?
R v H: 2 stage test for part (b) of the definition of sexual under s. 78:
(1) Was it potentially sexual?
(2) Was it actually sexual?
What if the touching is not sexual?
Touching may be Battery (not assault)
Mens Rea of s. 2 - s. 4 SOA 2003 Offences
1) Intentional conduct
2) Absence of reasonable belief in consent
s. 4 = mens rea as to the result
Difference between s. 1 - s.4 SOA 2003 offences and s. 5 - s. 8 SOA 2003 offences
They mirror each other but D can be prosecuted under these offences regardless of consent
Define ‘rape of a child under 13’ - as per the statute
s. 5 SOA 2003: (1) A person commits an offence if -
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with his penis and
(b) the other person is is under 13
Max. penalty = life