Property Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Theft definition

A

S.1 theft act 1968 - dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theft steps

A
  1. Appropriation
  2. Property
  3. Belonging to another
  4. Dishonest
  5. Intention to permanently deprive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Appropriation cases
A

S.3 theft act 1968- assumption by a person of the rights of the owner of the property

Morris- it is enough for assumption of any of the rights of the owner- does not need to be all the rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Appropriation specific cases
A

Lawrence- appropriation can occur even when there is consent

Hinks- appropriation can take place even if it was a voluntary gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2.property

A

S.4 (1) theft act 1968- property includes money and all other property real or personal including things in action is and other tangible property

Oxford v moss- confidential information is not theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Belonging to another
A

S.5 theft act 1968- property belongs to someone who has possession or control or any proprietary right or interest in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Belonging to another- possession and control

A

Turner - can be guilty of stealing your own property

Woodman- can be in possession or control without knowing its there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Belonging to another- under obligation

A

S.5 (3) theft act 1968- person receives property under an obligation to the other to retain and deal

Davidge v bunnett - Mission or control remains with the other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Belonging to another - abandoned property

A

Williams v philips- Rubbish left in a dustbin for the council to collect becomes owned by the council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Dishonest
A

S.2 (1)- situations where it would NOT be dishonest

A) belief that defendant has in law the right deprive the other of it

B) belief that he would have the others consent

C) belief that the person who owns the property cannot be discovered by taken reasonable steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dishonest (ghosh test)

A

1) would defendants behaviour be regarded as dishonest by a reasonable and honest person
2) was defendant aware that his conduct was dishonest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Intention to permanently deprive
A

S.6 theft act 1968- Has intention to permanently deprive if his intention is to treat it as his own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intention to permanently deprive ( conditional intent )

A

Easom- conditional intent is Insufficient for mens rea of theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Robbery definition

A

s.8 theft act 1968- defendant steals and immediately before or at the time of doing so and in order to do so uses force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Robbery steps

A
  1. Force used
  2. Immediately before or at the time of stealing
  3. In order to steal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Force used
A

Dawson + james- the word force is given its ordinary meaning

B + R v Dpp- doesn’t matter if victim is actually put in fear or not

Clouden- Does not have to be direct force on V

17
Q
  1. Immediately
A

Hale- if force is after the stealing it can still be satisfied if it is a continuing appropriation

Corocoran + anderton - robbery can be committed at the point of appropriation even though D fails to steal anything

18
Q

3.in order to steal

A

Force / threat must be in order to steal

It is not robbery if the force was used to escape

19
Q

Duress definition

A

Graham- defendant was impelled to act as he did because he feared death/serious physical harm and he responded as a sober person of reasonable firmness sharing his characteristics would have done

20
Q

Duress steps

A
  1. Nature of threat
  2. Who the threat was made to
  3. Was the threat connected to the offence
  4. Defendant was reasonable and genuine in belief of threat
  5. The defendant responded as reasonable and sober person
  6. Immediacy of threat and possible escape
  7. Was it self induced
21
Q
  1. Nature of threat
A

Graham- D must have feared death or serious physical injury

Valderrama - vega - must be threats of death and serious injury

22
Q
  1. Who
A

Valderrama- vega - can be made to a member of d’s immediate family

Hasan- can be made to a person for whose safety the defendant would reasonably regard himself as responsible

23
Q
  1. Connection between threat and offence
A

Cole- must be a connection between threats made to defendant and the offence committed in response to the threats

24
Q
  1. Reasonable and genuine in belief of threat
A

Hasan- defendant must reasonably and genuinely believe the threat will be carried out

25
Q
  1. Respond as a sober person of reasonable firmness
A

Graham- did defendant respond as a sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the characteristics of defendant

Bowen: characteristics are relevant

  • age and sex
  • physical disability
  • pregnancy
  • mental illness
26
Q
  1. Immediacy/ chance of escape
A

Hasan- The defendant must believe the threats will be carried out immediately almost immediately

27
Q
  1. Self induced
A

Sharp- where a person voluntarily and we have knowledge of its nature join the criminal organisation and he knew it would bring pressure of committing an offence and he was an active member

Hasan- defendant voluntarily associates with others who engage in criminal activity