Property Flashcards

Real Rights and Personal Rights

1
Q

What are personal rights?

Give an example

A

Personal rights are rights against another person.

An example of a personal right is a contractual right. This is a reciprocal type of right which binds both parties. Per say, if Crystal owns a house and enters into a contract of sale with Grace, Crystal will have a personal right against Grace to be paid the agreed price and Grace will have the personal right against Crystal to be given possession of the house, as well as a deed of transfer called a ‘disposition’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are real rights?

What is the main important real right?

A

Real rights are rights directly in a thing.

The main important real right is the right of ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compare personal rights and real rights characteristics.

Is one better than the other?
Use examples

A

The holder of a personal right has a power over the other person. The owner of a real right has a direct power over the thing. A personal right is just as good as the person it is held against.

E.g . If Kolela borrows £1000 to Francine and Francine is able and willing to pay Kolela back then Kolela’s claim is good as gold. However, if Francine becomes insolvent then Kolela’s personal right is of limited value.

Just as a real right is as good as the thing in which it is held. If Kolela owns a book which is worth £1000, however, it gets burnt and destroyed in a fire, all Kolela has is ashes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a disposition?

A

A disposition is a deed of transfer of land from the seller to the buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a servitude?

A

A servitude is a real right which allows a landowner to make limited use of the neighboring land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are personal rights and real rights sometimes referred to as?

A

Personal rights are sometimes referred to as movable rights and real rights are referred to as heritable or immovable rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give an example of an intellectual property?

Are they regarded as real rights or personal rights?

A

A copyright is an intellectual property.

They are regarded as real rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Angela owns a farm, she enters into a contract with Barry. The contract allows Barry to use a farm track to access his cottage. Angela then sells the farm to Callum. How does this affect Barry?

A

Barry will be affected by Callum’s decision, for example, not allowing him access through the farm track as Barry only has a personal right against Angela.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What if, instead of entering into a contract with Barry, Angela grants him a servitude?

A

If Angela grants Barry a servitude, that will give him a subordinate real right meaning that even in the case of a transfer of ownership from Angela to Callum, Barry’s real right of servitude will be enforceable against Callum too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is another name for immovable property?

A

Another name for immovable property is heritable property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are subordinate real rights?

Give examples?

A

A subordinate real right, is a real right in something , held by someone other than the owner.

Examples are, servitudes, a lease, a right in security and a liferent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What type of contractual rights are considered heritable?

A

Contractual rights about real rights in land are considered heritable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does corporeal property and incorporeal property mean?

Give examples

A

Corporeal property means physical things such as bicycles and houses; incorporeal property means non-physical property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the combining of the four categories?

A

The first category is corporeal moveable property, such as a bicycle. 2nd is corporeal heritable property such as a house. 3rd is incorporeal moveable property such as contractual rights, intellectual property and company shares.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many real rights of ownership can there be in something?

How many subordinate real rights can there be in something?

A

There can only be one real right of ownership in something.

There can be multiple subordinate real rights in something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Diana owned a farm, she grants a servitude of access through the farm to Fabien, she also grants a lease to Exaucé. How many real rights are there? If Diana sells her farm to Dorcas, how many real rights are there now? How will Fabien and Exaucé be affected by the transfer of ownership? If Exaucé then grants a sub-lease to Naomi, how many real rights are there?

A

There are three real rights, Diana’s real right of ownership in the farm, Fabien subordinate real right of servitude and Exaucé’s subordinate real right of lease. If Diana sells her farm to Dorcas, there will still be three real rights, all that will have happened is that Diana no longer will have the real right of ownership as she will transfer it over to Dorcas. Neither Fabien nor Exaucé will be negatively affected by the transfer of ownership from Diana to Dorcas, as they hold subordinate real rights, which is enforceable against Dorcas too (as it is against the world). If Exaucé then grants a sub-lease to Naomi there will be four real rights, as Naomi’s sub-lease will count as the fourth subordinate real right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Darren owns a house, to buy the house he took out a loan from Busted Bank Plc and granted Busted bank plc a standard security. Darren is eventually sequestrated. What can Busted Bank Plc do?

What can Darren’s unsecured creditors do?

A

In this scenario there are two real rights, Darren’s real right of ownership in the house and Busted Bank Plc’s subordinate real right of standard security. Busted Bank Plc can sell Darren’s house in order to recover what they are owed by Darren.

Darren’s unsecured creditors cannot pick an asset and sell it to get their money, they must wait until the property is sold and Darren will divide what is left amongst them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If Darren decides to sell his house which is standard to subject of security with Busted Bank Plc, would that security transfer to the new owner?

What could the new owner have done before buying the house?

A

Yes, the security would transfer to the new owner as real rights survive a change of ownership.

So if the new owner refuses to pay the loan the bank can still take the house from him/her.

So the new owner would ask Darren to discharge that security before buying the house.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the Latin for ‘Competition between real rights’ and what does it translate to in English?

A

“Prior temporé potior jury this translates to ‘Earlier by time, stronger by right’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Hillary owns a house, she grants a standard security to Bank 1 for £100,00, she then grants a standard security to bank 2 for £50,000. Hillary is made bankrupt. The house is sold for £130,000. how much does Bank 1 get? How much does bank 2 get?

A

Hillary has the real right of ownership, Bank 1 has a subordinate real right of security and so does Bank 2; therefore there are 3 real rights. Bank 1 will get the £100,000 they are owed, the remaining £30,000 will go back into the pot and that is what Bank 2 would receive, they will have made a loss. This is due to prior temper potior juré (earlier by time, stronger by right).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the only way to have more than one right of lease?

A

The only way to have more than one right of lease is the the tenant grants out a sub-lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Joyce owns a farm. She grants a lease to Grace and she enters into possession. Joyce then immediately grants a further lease of the farm to Naomi. How many real rights are there? What has happened to Grace’s lease? What about Naomi’s? Next, Joyce grants a standard security to Lovely Bank Plc. How many real rights are there now? If Lovely Bank have to enforce the standard security (and do so by selling the farm), can Lovely Bank remove the tenant Grace?

A

There are only two real rights, Joyce’s real right of ownership to the farm and Grace’s subordinate real right of lease. There cannot be more than one right of lease, so Joyce cannot grant a lease to Naomi after having granted it to Grace (only Grace can grant a sub-lease to another person for there to be two real rights of lease)

If Joyce grants a standard security to Lovely Bank Plc, there are now three real rights, this is including Lovely Bank Plc’s subordinate real right of security.

Lovely Bank cannot remove the tenant Grace as her real right came before theres, prior temporé potior juré.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the meaning of intestate?

Testate?

A

When someone dies intestate, this means that they have died without leaving a will.

To have died having left a will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the latin for ‘abandoned property’?

A

Bona vacantia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

If an owner of property dies intestate and without traceable family, what happens to their property?

A

The ownership to their property transfers to the crown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

If a juristic person (an estate or legal entity) is dissolved (closes down) still holding it’s assets, what happens to those assets?

Give Case.

A

If a Juristic person is dissolved still holding it’s assets, the ownership to those assets transfer to the crown. ( The Queen and House of lords reprints the Crown)

In the case Mackenzie v McLean, damaged cans of McEwans Export and McEavns Pale Ale were dumped in a skip, from which the locals helped themselves. This was prosecuted as theft, this is because abandoned property belongs to the crown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Does lost property equate to abandoned property?

A

No, lost property does not equate to abandoned property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

At which point can lost property be passed onto the crown?

A

Lost property can be passed onto the crown after 20 years of being out of possession.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

In which statute is the procedure for handling lost and abandoned property found?

Give relatable case?

A

The procedure for handling lost and abandoned property is found in ‘Part VI ‘ of the ‘Civic Government Scotland Act 1982’.

In the case ‘Lord Advocate v University of Aberdeen and Budge 1963’ students from the university of Aberdeen found some 8th century treasure in Mr Budge’s land. The University intended to exhibit them in their university museum. Despite the universities defense that because the treasure was found in Mr Budges land, it should belong to him, the treasure was transferred to the Crown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Explain Derivative Acquisition?

A

Derivative acquisition is when ownership is acquired through voluntary acquisition from the seller to the buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Explain Original Acquisition?

A

Original acquisition is when ownership is acquired and does not require anyones consent, other than the acquirer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

In order to become an owner of land what must one do?

A

In order to become an owner of land, one must receive a disposition (which is a deed of transfer from the seller to the buyer) and they must register the disposition in the Land Register; then they will obtain the real right of ownership of land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

In order to become an owner of a corporeal moveable property, what needs to happen?

A

In order to become an owner of a corporeal moveable property there needs to be an overt act, such as delivery of the the property after the contractual agreement has been completed and payment has been made. Ownership is transferred not by mere agreement but by an overt act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Explain the publicity principle?

A

The publicity principle is that when contractual agreements are completed for property they must be made public. Acts which can affect third parties should be made public, so that that third parties can know of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Give examples of cases where an agreement created valid personal rights but not real rights?

A

In the case Wheeldon’s Ex v Spence’s Ex 2014, Ms Spence signed an agreement which read that Mr Wheeldon assumed full title to the property, however, due to the lack of disposition, there was no real right, the right was simply personal and Ms Spence remained the owner.

In the case Johnstone’s Trustee’s v Baird 2012, a formal agreement stated that ‘the home shall be owned by the sole name of the first party for convenience’, the parties among them agreed that the property would be owned equal share. However, since the property was in the sole name of one party that meant that he was the sole owner. Their agreement created a personal right however not a real right, their names were not in the Land Register.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Transfer is instantaneous. Give case?

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Compare void, voidable and absolutely good title?

A

A void contract is one which is invalid. A voidable contract is still valid, however, can be avoided and become void. An absolutely good title, is one which is completely valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Explain ‘force and fear’?

A

When a contract has been brought about by ‘force and fear’ that contract will be void. This is because it was forced upon and not consented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Explain how a ‘voidable’ title can arise? Give example

A

A voidable contract can arise when someone validly acquires property, however in a way which is contrary to the right of someone else. That other person then has the option of avoiding the title. For example, fraudulently inducing someone into a contract creates a valid but voidable contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Explain how a void title can arise?

A

A void title happens either because the granter did not have the right in the first place, so the granter’s title itself was void meaning the grantee could not then obtain a valid title.

In the case of Land, a transfer may have consent but a failure to register makes the title void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Explain the transfer of a voidable titles consequences?

A

If the granter with an already voidable title transfers title and the grantee was aware of the voidable title, then the grantee’s title will also be voidable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Explain inhibition?

A

A creditor can inhibit their debtor that if he dispense any heritable property thereafter, the grantee’s title will be voidable, unless she is paid what she is owed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Person A, an elderly owns land worth £300,000, Person B a con-woman, produces a fake valuation saying it is worth 200,000. She offers person A £250,000 and he accepts, on a later date an economic crisis arises and property values plunge.The land then becomes worth £200,000, person A discovers the fraud. He will obviously not exercise his option to avoid the contract and on settlement day he receives the £250,000. Will the disposition he hands to person B in exchange be void, voidable or absolutely good?

A

In this situation, the disposition A hands to B will be absolutely good. This is because a contract can be voidable but not the conveyance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Is reduction available in sale of goods?

A

Reduction is available only if there is a deed of transfer to be reduced, so it is not available in sales of goods. In the case of a Land Register title, the decree must be registered , for the defender loses ownership only when the decree of reduction is registered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What would the title of a gratuitous grant be?

For example, the granter owns a Mercedes, when he becomes insolvent he gives it to the grantee. What is the outcome? Use Legislation.

A

If the grant was gratuitous then the grantee’s title would be voidable regardless of whether the granter knew of it or not.

The transfer would be voidable under s.6 of the Bankruptcy Scotland Act 2016.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

When the seller of goods has a voidable title to them but the title has not been avoided at the time of the sale and the buyer buys them in good faith and without knowledge of the seller’s defect, what kind of title will they acquire?

A

When the seller of goods has a voidable title to them but the title has not been avoided at the time of the sale and the buyer buys them in good faith and without knowledge of the seller’s defect the buyer will acquire a good title to the goods.

47
Q

Transfer where the grantee’s title is void: Explain the ‘nemo plus rule’ ?

A

If the granter’d title is void, the grantee’s title is normally also void. For example if the granter steals something then sells it to the buyer, their title will also be void, even if the buyer acted in good faith. The granter cannot transfer a right he does not have.

48
Q

Nella owes £10,000 to Sola Ltd, a company not wholly owned by Sola. The right to be paid is transferable. Sola transfers it to Adiola. Would this be valid?

A

No, the right was not Sola’s, so she could not transfer it. The right to be paid is owed to the Company as shareholders, and not the individuals.

49
Q

Patricia owns land. On Monday she delivers to Michel a deed granting him a liferent of the land. On Tuesday she delivers RayeRaye a disposition to the land. On Wednesday RayeRaye registers in the land registration. What will happen to Michel’s application to register?

What kind of title would RayeRaye have?

What if she acquired the ownership in bad faith?

A

Michel’s application will be rejected because although when the deed was delivered to him, the granter, Patricia, was the owner, real rights in land arise not when the deed is delivered but on registration. At that moment Patricia was not the owner, RayeRaye was. Regardless of whether she was in good faith or not they will still have valid ownership (prior temporé potior juré). if she was indeed in bad faith, her title will be valid but voidable.
(This is due to the offside goal)

50
Q

To what is a grantee’s right subject?

What is it not subject to?

A

When a grantee acquires a real right, it is subject to the existing real rights of the third parties. It is not subject to the personal rights of the third parties against the granter.

51
Q

Seller A contracts with buyer B. The seller then sells the thing to another buyer C and the buyer C knows about the prior obligation owed to buyer B. What rule could be applied here? What would buyer C’s title be?

Give case.

A

In this case the ‘offside goal’ would apply and C’s title will be voidable at the instance of B.

In the case Rodger Ltd v Faudry, the owner of a land concluded missives to sell to Rodger Ltd. When the company failed to pay the price, he then sold to Marjorie Bell. A disposition was granted to her and recorded in the Sasine Register. She was now owner, but the company raised an action of reduction against her. The court agreed and the disposition was reduced.

52
Q

Who does the offside goal not apply to?
Give cases.

(record yango)

A

The offside goal only applies to voluntary grantee’s. So it does not apply to creditors doing diligence or to trustee’s in sequestration.

In the case Burnett’s Tr v Grainger, Mrs Burnett was contractually bound to give a good title to mr and Mrs Grainger. She was sequestrated. her trustee knew of the contract, but nevertheless transferred title to his own name. The offside goal could not be pled against him by Mr and Mrs Grainger.

The rule also applies only if the first buyer’s right was capable of becoming a real right.

In the case Wallace v Simmers, William Simmers agreed with his daughter that she would occupy a cottage on his farm indefinitely and rent-free. Later, he conveyed the farm to his son, he knew of the agreement with his sister and was happy with it. Years later he sold the farm to Robert and Douglas Wallace. They asked Margaret Simmers to leave, when she refused they sued to have her removed. She plead that they knew of her right before buying. The court held that even if they did know, they were not bound thereby. Margaret’s right was not a lease, it was a personal right and so was outwit the scope of the ‘offside goal rule’.

53
Q

Suppose that the title of the granter X is void, with the result that the title of the grantee Y is also void, and then suppose that at a later date X acquires title from the true owner Z, what happens to Y’s title?

What is this called?

A

As soon as Z’s title passes to X, y’s title is validated, without the need for any new deed.

This is called Accretion of title.

54
Q

What is an unregistered holder?

A

An unregistered holder is someone who has the power to complete title but who has not yet done so. One must have a disposition in order to be an unregistered holder, without a disposition regardless missives being completed, one would not be regarded as an unregistered holder.

55
Q

What does the law allow unregistered holders to do?

What can it be regarded as an exception to?

A

The law allows unregistered holders to dispose their disposition to someone else.

This rule can be regarded as an exception to the ‘memo plus’ principle.

56
Q

Explain the stages of a Contract?

A

The first stage is the contract of sale. Such a contract has to be in writing, signed by the parties or their agents. It usually takes the form of a missive. Missive is a letter which means an exchange of letters. The first is an offer to buy or less commonly an offer to sell. The reply may be a qualified acceptance’ which means a rejection in the eyes of the law with a counter-offer. Once a consensus has been reached the missives are said to be concluded. The buyer does not yet have a real right but a personal right. The net stage is a settlement.

57
Q

Explain an Inhibition?

A

An inhibition is an order from a court that affects an owner’s power to grant deeds affecting title to heritage property, in particular dispositions and standard securities. It can be obtained by a creditor who holds decree for payment and also by a pursuer during an action as a protective measure. An inhibitor is discharged if the debtor pays.

58
Q

Explain how an inhibition is registered?

A

The inhibition is registered in the Registration of inhibitions. This, like the Sassine Register and the Land Register is administered by the Keeper.

59
Q

What happens if a deed is granted notwithstanding an inhibition?

A

That deed will not be void, however, will be voidable at the inhibitor’s option.

60
Q

How is avoidance carried out?

A

Avoidance is carried out by an action of reduction.

61
Q

Explain a Settlement?

A

Settlement takes place at the date of entry. The buyer pays the price and the seller gives possession and delivers the disposition. On delivery of the deposition, the buyer does not acquire ownership, but rather the power to become owner, without any further co-operation by the granter, simply by registering the disposition in the Land Register. A person in this position is called an’ unregistered holder of land’.

62
Q

What is Warrandice?

A

Warrandice means the grantee given by the granter to the grantee that the title is good. A deed (disposition) contains an express ‘grant’ of warrandice but if the deed is silent, warrandice is implied by the law.

63
Q

Describe the 1st step of Warrandice? (the lowest level)

A

The lowest is ‘simple’ warrandice. Suppose that Sanaa owns a flat and besotted by love, dispense it to her boyfriend Morris. gratuitously and he promptly registers. Nothing she could do thereafter could prejudice his title.

64
Q

What if Sanaa and Morris break up, she has a new boyfriend Chris, she grants her new boyfriend Chris a disposition of the flat and he registers. What happens?

A

Sanaa will now become liable to morris for breach of warrandice.

65
Q

Describe the 2nd step of Warrandice? (the middle level)

A

The middle level is ‘fact and deed’ warrandice. Here, the granter guarantees the grantee’s title against any future or past act by the granter.

66
Q

Suppose that Lianna dispones to Stephan and grants him a ‘fact and deed warrandice, however, there is a standard security over the property held by Erraid granted by Lianna, what would the outcome be?

A

Although Lianna is indeed the owner, since that security was granted by Lianna, then she is in breach of her warrancide to Erraid.

67
Q

Describe the 3rd step of Warrandice (the highest level)

A

The highest level is ‘absolute’ warrandice. An absolute warrandice deed would normally sayI grant warrandice without specifying the type.

Absolute warrandice is a guarantee by the granter to the grantee that (i) the grantee will acquire ownership (or other right being granted) and (ii) the title will be unaffected by any encumbrances (notably subordinate real rights).

68
Q

Title conditions are a partial exception; can a title condition be a breach of warrandice?

A

Title conditions can only be a breach of warrandice if it was known to the grantee and materially lessens the properties value.

69
Q

What other partial exception to a breach of warrandice is there?

A

The case ‘Lothian & border Farers Ltd v McCutcheon’ is another exception, however, a controversial one, holding that a lease does not mean breach of warrandice.

70
Q

What is the remedy for breach of warrandice in a deed?

A

The remedy for breach of warrandice in a deed is damages.

71
Q

Explain the Gap risk.

A

The buyer may not be able to register the disposition right away. So the buyer is at risk, for the seller has the money already and is still owner of the property; in the gap period, the seller may become insolvent, this could affect the buyer.

72
Q

What does the Land Registration Scotland Act 2012 say in relation to the Gap risk?

A

The Land Registration Scotland Act 2012 creates a protective period of 35days. Such notice can be placed in the Land Register in advance of settlement and provided that the disposition is registered within the protected period, it will trump adverse entries made in either the Land Register or the Inhibitions Register. -sharp v thomson

73
Q

How are subordinate real rights in land transferred (assuming that the are transferrable)?

A

Subordinate real rights in land are incorporeal property and so are transferred by assignation.

74
Q

How is a standard security transferred?

What if the property itself is still in the Sasine Register?

A

A standard security is transferred by registration in the Land Register.

Unless the property itself is still in the Sasine Register, in which case the assignment is registered in that register.

75
Q

There are two sets of rules which exist for the transfer of corporeal moveable property, what are those?

Explain.

A

Otherwise the ‘Common law rules’ apply.

If you buy a book at a bookshop, the transfer of ownership is governed by the SOGA 1979, but if you then give the book to a friend as a Christmas present, that transfer is governed by common law. If you merely tell your friend that the present is her’s that is not enough, no delivery means no transfer.

76
Q

Under the SOGA 1979’ What are existing goods?

What are future goods?

A

Existing goods are those that the seller already has. Future goods are those to be manufactured or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale.

77
Q

What is the rule of transfer under the s.17 of the SOGA 1979?

A

Property is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties intend for them to be transferred, no external act such as delivery needed. The parties are free to agree that ownership passes before delivery, at delivery or after delivery.

78
Q

In witten contracts for the sale of goods, it is usual to have a provision saying when ownership is to pass. But sometimes and usually in real contracts there is nothing, Which statue provides the default rules for this? How many rules are provided?

A

s. 18 of the SOGA 1979 provides five default rules.

s. 19 of the SOGA provides a sixth rule for the reservation right of disposal.

79
Q

Rule 1 of s.18 of the SOGA 1979 creates a risk for the seller: ownership passes immediately, the parties shake hands on the deal, without payment. What happens if the buyer becomes insolvent? State Legislation?

A

If the buyer becomes insolvent s.41 of the SOGA 1979 says that the seller, on losing the real right of ownership, acquires a subordinate real right called the ‘seller’s lien’. But this lien is lost as and when the goods are delivered.

80
Q

What can a seller do to be protected after delivery under s.41 of the SOGA 1979?

A

Sellers who wish to be protected even after delivery can opt for retention of title.

81
Q

How are personal rights transferred?

Which personal rights are usually able to be transferred?

A

Personal rights are transferred by assignation completed by intimation.

Usually personal rights to be paid money can be transferred. Three parties are involved.

82
Q

Explain retention of title?

A

Most written contracts for the sale of goods have a clause of retention of title. If the buyer fails to pay the seller can rescind the contract on the ground of material breach and then demand re-delivery of the goods on the basis that the seller is still the owner.

83
Q

What can a clause of retention title say?

A

A clause of retention of title can validly say that ownership is not to pass unless all sums owed by the buyer to the seller have been paid.

84
Q

What is the ‘Nemo plus rule’?

A

Where goods are sold by a person who is not their own, and who does not sell them under the authority or with the consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to the goods than the seller did. The buyer’s title would be void just as the seller’s title.

85
Q

Suppose that Leonard owes £10,000 to Maria. From Maria’s point of view, that is an asset. She can transfer it to Nick. What will be the result?

What would maria be referred to as? What would nick be referred to as?

What is the transfer called?

A

The result will be that Nick will be substituted for Maria as Leonard’s creditor.
Maria is the ‘cement’ and nick is called the ‘assignee’.

The transfer is called assignation.

86
Q

Normally, can a debtor assign the obligation to pay?

A

Normally, a debtor cannot assign the obligation to pay. It would mean that you could borrow money, spend it and then happily assign the debt to someone else.

87
Q

What are the exceptions that allow debtors to assign obligation to pay?

A

The first is that the creditor consents, so if X owes money to Y, X’s obligation to pay can be transferred to Z if all three parties ao agree.

Secondly, The contract itself may expressively or implicitly permit transfer by the debtor.

88
Q

Does the contract to assign need to be in writing?

A

The contract to assign does not need to be in writing.

89
Q

Which Act abolished the need for the contract of assignation to be in writing?

Which Legislation sets out a simpler style of assignation?

Is this compulsory?

A

The Requirements of Writing Scotland Act 1995 abolished the need for the contract of assignation to be in writing.

The Transmission of Moveable property Scotland Act 1862 sets out a simple style of assignation, however it is not compulsory.

90
Q

Explain the Effect of assignation or intimation? Use case.

A

The contract to assign does not have to be in writing, the need for the contract of assignation to be in writing was abolished by the ‘Requirements of Writing Scotland Act 1995’. Transfer of claim takes place not on delivery of the deed of assignation but on intimation to the debtor. Upon intimation the personal right passes from the cedent’s patrimony to the assignee’s. The assignee replaces the cedent as creditor of the debtor. All exceptions competent against the cedent before the assignation or intimation are relevant against the assignee.

In the case ‘Scottish Windows Fund v Busit’ Mr Moir took out a life assurance policy, assuring the company that he was in good health and of sober habits. In fact, he suffered from syphilis and alcoholism. He assigned the benefit of the policy to Mr Busit. When Mr Moir died Mr Buist, who had acted in good faith, sought payment of the policy proceeds. The company refused to pay, citing the assignatus utter principle. The defence was upheld. Suppose that Mr moi had not assigned the policy. Then, on his death, the company could have refused to pay his executor.

91
Q

The assignation utter rule applies to matters as they are at the date of intimation. Explain with case?

A

The assignation utter rule applies to matters as they are at the date of intimation. In ‘Hugh Macpherson’s JF v Mackay’, Hugh was one of the beneficiaries of a large trust set p by his late father, Archie . A beneficial right in a trust is incorporeal moveable property and can, in most cases at least, be assigned. Hugh married Alice. A separate family trust , a marriage trust was established. Hugh assigned his share in Trust 1 to the extent of £1,000 to the trustees of Trust 2. The assignation was intimated to the trustee of Trust 1 and indeed the sole trustee. Over time, trust 1 paid out to Hugh the whole amount allocated to him under the trust. After Hughe’s death, the trustees of Trust 2 claimed £1,000 from Trust 1. The trustee’s of Trust 1 plead assignatus utitur, arguing that Hugh could not have claimed that money, and so his assignees could not either. This defense failed. At the time when the assignation was intimated, the money was there. However, the assignation utter principle is a shield not a sword.In ‘ Binstock Miller & Co Ltd v E Coya & Co Ltd’, there was a sale of orange juice. The buyer paid part of the price and the sellers then assigned their right to the balance. When the signee sought payment, the buyers refused to pay, saying that the orange juice was disconfirm to contract and had been rejected by them. The buyers not only refused to pay the balance, but sought to claim back rom the assignees the part of the price that they had already paid to the sellers. It was held that, although the buyers were entitled to refuse to pay the balance, they could not recover their money from the assignees. They would have to claim that from the sellers.

92
Q

The assignation utter principle is a shield not a sword. Explain with case?

A

In ‘ Binstock Miller & Co Ltd v E Coya & Co Ltd’, there was a sale of orange juice. The buyer paid part of the price and the sellers then assigned their right to the balance. When the signee sought payment, the buyers refused to pay, saying that the orange juice was disconfirm to contract and had been rejected by them. The buyers not only refused to pay the balance, but sought to claim back rom the assignees the part of the price that they had already paid to the sellers. It was held that, although the buyers were entitled to refuse to pay the balance, they could not recover their money from the assignees. They would have to claim that from the sellers.

93
Q

There are some non-standard cases to the law of assignation. Explain the steps?

State Legislation.

A
  1. If the debt has been embodied in a fully negotiable instrument, intimation is not required and the assignation utitur rule does not apply. The rules are in the ‘Bill of Exchange Act 1882’.
  2. Rights under life insurance contracts are assignable, but there exists special legislation. The ‘Policies of Assurance Act 1867, s.5’.
94
Q

Negative Prescription: Personal Right

Abigail borrows money from Brendan in 2012, the loan contract saying that repayment is to be on 15th May 2014. She does not repay. If between the 15th of May 2014 and the 15th of may 2019 she pays nothing and does not acknowledge the debts existence and he does not raise an action, what will happen?

How long does a right to be repaid a debt normally last?

What is it referred to as?

Which legislation sets out the cut off period of time for the right to be repaid a debt?

A

The right to be repaid a debt normally lasts If by the time the loan contract says that repayment must take place, the debtor pays nothing and the creditor does not acknowledge the debts existence and does not raise an action, the debt will be extinguished. This is due to negative prescription.
The ‘Prescription and limitation Scotland Act 1973’ in s.6 sets out the cut off period of time for the right to be repaid a debt.

95
Q

Distinguish between ‘Negative Prescription’ and ‘Limitation’?

How long is the period of limitation?

A

Negative Prescription extinguishes as obligation, limitation does not, but it bars the raising of an action except with the permission of the court.

The limitation period is three years.

96
Q

Explain Negative Prescription for Subordinate Real Rights?

Give Example.

A

Subordinate real rights can also be extinguished by Negative Prescription, through non-exercise for 20 years.

For example, if there is a servitude, but it is not exercised for 20years, then, at the end of that period, it is extinguished.

97
Q

Does Negative Prescription affect the Real Right of Ownership?

A

No, the real right of ownership is excluded from negative prescription.

98
Q

Heather inherits a house in 2000. She neither uses it nor lets it out and in fact never visits it. It is taken over by squatters. In 2015, has her ownership been out down by the non-possession for 20years?

A

No, her ownership remains.

99
Q

What rights does positive prescription apply to?

does it apply to any other rights?

A

Positive prescription applies to real rights in land.

No.

100
Q

To acquire ownership of land by prescription there are two requirements. What are they?

A

The first is possession for ten years. The second is that the person has an ostensible registered title.

101
Q

Adam owns land and in 2015 dispensed it to Hannah. There was misrepresentation by Hannah, the result of which is that the transfer is voidable. But Adam does nothing. In 2025 what would happen to the title?

A

In 2025 the title would cease to be voidable but ownership does not pass.
Ownership passed to Hannah from Adam in 2015 when the disposition was registered.

102
Q

In occasions where the Keeper does not know the deed is void, or makes a mistake what can be done?

A

In this situation, prescription could then run in favour of the grantee.

103
Q

In some cases the Keeper does know that a disposition is wholly or partially void, because the granter has no title but still accepts it.

What is such a deed known as?

What does non-domino disposition mean?

A

Such a deed is known as a non-domino disposition.

This means from a non-owner.

104
Q

Under what circumstances will the Keeper accept a non-domino disposition?

A

The first condition is that the property must already have been possessed by the granter or grantee for at least one year.

The second is that the person who appears to be the owner must be notified, if no one else can be identified, The Queen’s and Lord Treasurer’s remembrancer must be notified, because the crown takes property that is ownerless.

105
Q

In order for prescription to run does the grantee have to be in good faith?

What is the exception?

A

No, the grantee does not need to be in good faith for prescription to run.

The exception to this is forgery.

106
Q

Cornelius owns land and Darius impersonates him and forges his signature on a disposition to Elfriede. Elfriede is in good faith and the disposition is registered.

What is the title of the disposition?

Can prescription still run?

What if she knew of the forgery?

A

The disposition is void and she does not acquire ownership.

Prescription will run and after years she will become owner.

If she knew that the deed was forged, prescription does not run in her favour.

107
Q

Does possession obtained by force count?

How about judicial interruption- for example, a court action?

A

Possession by force does not count and neither does interrupted by a court action.

108
Q

What two types of possessions are there?

A

There is direct possession and indirect possession.

109
Q

Suppose that there is an invalid disposition to Polonius, registered in the Land Register. He immediately grants a 25year lease of the property to Queen.

In who’s favour does prescription run?

A

Prescription will run in Polonius’ favour and after ten years his title will be good.

110
Q

Benedict buys property in good faith from Caspar, she is protected from any invisible invalidity in Casper’s title, why is this?

A

This is because the nemo plus principle is misapplied in some types of case involving the Land Register, so that Benedict will probably become owner immediately.

111
Q

Can positive prescription apply to subordinate real rights?

What is the length of time for this?

A

Yes, positive prescription is possible as a means of acquiring certain subordinate real rights, such as servitudes and public rights of way.

The period is 20years.

112
Q

The Incentive to register.

A

The law makes registration a necessary part of the process of conveyancing — No registration means no real right. While the Land Register and the Sasine Register differ in many respects, both adopt that principle. Registration is compulsory in the sense that those who don’t register do not acquire a real right with any effect. This principle only applies to real rights and not to personal rights. For example, Adam owns land and enters into a contract of sale with Eve. She thereby acquires a personal right to require Adam to grant her a disposition, in exchange for payment of the price. The contract creates personal rights only, and thus valid without registration.

113
Q

Public access and the title glasshouse

A

Both the Sasine Register and the Land Register are public. If Fergus transfers his house to ingrid, that fact can readily be discovered by anyone and everyone else by payment to the Keeper of a modest fee.

114
Q

Overriding interests

A

A buyer is under the Land Registration Act 1979, protected against ‘omitted encumbrances’, such as third party rights that are not disclosed in the title sheet, but this applies only to such encumbrances as should, by specific legislative provision, have been entered in the title sheet.