Property Flashcards
Grantor conveys land “to A and her heirs.” What kind of interest in land has been created?
A fee simple absolute - meaning it is lasts indefinitely, is freely inheritable, and transferable during life. (note that even though it mentions A’s heirs, A can transfer the land and give her heirs NADA)
What is a defeasible fee simple?
A fee simple that may terminate upon a certain event occurring - ALL defeasible fee simples contain a future interest either for a third party or the grantor.
What are the three types of defeasible fee simple estates?
(1) a fee simple determinable (automatic termination if property is used in predetermined way barred by grantor); (2) fee simple subject to a condition subsequent (termination requires re-entry by grantor); (3) fee simple subject to an executory interest (potential future interest goes to a third party, not the grantor).
Grantor gives land “to A so long as the property is used only as a school.” What interest in land has been created?
A fee simple determinable. If A uses the land for a reason other than a school, the property automatically reverts back to the grantor.
Grantor gives land “to A so long as the property is used only as a school.” What is the name of the interest retained by the grantor?
The grantor retains a right of reverter (if property used for another purpose, automatically reverts back to grantor).
Grantor gives land “to A, but if the property is used to sell liquor, then I may retake the premises.” What interest in land has been created?
A fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. The forfeiture is not automatic here - the grantor has to reenter and retake the land.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if the property is used to sell liquor, then I may retake the premises.” What is the name of the interest retained by the grantor?
A right of re-entry is retained by the grantor if the condition occurs. This right of re-entry can be waived if not exercised in a reasonable time, and though the re-entry right can usually be transferred at death, grantor cannot give another person his/her right of re-entry during grantor’s life.
Grantor gives land “to A as long as he farms the homestead, and if not, then to B.” What kind of interest in land has been created?
A fee simple subject to an executory interest. If the triggering event occurs, a third party retains the executory interest.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if A sells liquor on the property, then to B.” What kind of future interest exists and for whom?
B has a shifting executory interest in the land - if A sells liquor on the property then it automatically shifts to B.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if A sells liquor on the property, then one day later to B.” What kind of future interest exists and for whom?
B has a springing executory interest in the lane - if A sells liquor on the property then the land reverts to the grantor and later has to go to B.
The grantor gives land “to A for life.” What kind of interest in land has been created AND what future interest has been created?
This is a life estate for A’s life. Since there is no provision saying what happens when A dies, there is a reversion interest - land will go back to the grantor. This reversion is transferable by the grantor (inter vivos or upon grantor’s death).
Grantor gives land “to A for life, then to B.” What future interest has been created?
B has a vested remainder in the estate: the land will automatically vest to B at the end of A’s life (this is a certain land interest for B and so B can transfer this interest).
Grantor gives land “to A for life, then to the children of B.” What future interest has been created?
This is a vested remainder subject to open (divestment) - the class of people (children of B) could just be one child, but it could “open” if B has additional children.
Grantor gives land “to A for life, remainder to B if B married before A’s death.” What future interest has been created?
This is a contingent remainder: B has to satisfy a condition before his interest will vest. B’s contingent remainder is not transferrable.
Grantor gives land “To A for life, then to such of B’s children who are alive at B’s death.” What future interest has been created?
This is a contingent remainder: the grantee(s) of the remainder are not ascertainable at the time of the grant.
Torel Tenant writes a letter to Landlord telling her that he is unhappy in his lease and wants to get out of it. The landlord writes back and says that she will treat the lease as terminated. A few days later, Torel receives a bill in the mail for the rent due for the remainder of the lease term. Which of the following is correct?
a) T need not pay rent because the landlord’s letter constituted acceptance of T’s surrender
b) Torel must still pay rent because landlord did not expressly waive this obligation in her acceptance letter
c) Torel must still pay rent because landlord’s letter was not an acceptable acceptance of T’s surrender
d) T must still pay rent because a surrender does not terminate a tenant’s duty to pay rent
a) A tenant is relieved of his duty to pay rent if landlord accept’s T’s offer of surrender - the letters constituted effective termination and acceptance of surrender.
Which of the following does not constitute a negative easement?
a) Landowner may not construct any building higher than one story on her property
b) Landowner may not operate a business on her property
c) Landowner may not build a 12-foot fence around her property
d) Landowner may not remove the retaining wall that surrounds her property
b) a negative easement restricts the servient tenement from building structures that restrict access to air, light, or support. This is none of those.
Mortimer built a garage and driveway on his small lot. The driveway was against the boundary of the neighboring lot owned by Gertrude. Each time Mortimer drove around the corner of his driveway, his gar protruded into Gertrude’s lot by 5 inches. Which of the following is a correct statement?
a) Mortimer likely has an easement by implication
b) Mortimer likely has an easement by necessity
c) Mortimer does not need an easement because of estoppel.
d) none of the above
d) None of these are correct (remember, easement by implication requires the same landowner previously owned both lots!)
What is the difference between a tenancy at will and a tenancy at sufferance?
A tenancy at sufferance is a “hold-over” tenant - still bound by the terms of a lease that is no more but who still hasn’t been kicked off. A tenancy at will is created by agreement.
In states that recognize tenancy by the entirety:
a) Neither spouse can convey his/her interest without the other’s consent
b) The right of survivorship cannot be broken during the marriage
c) Either spouse may sever the tenancy
d) The tenancy may be severed by either spouse’s creditors
a) - this sort of tenancy can only be extinguished by mutual agreement. Only mutual creditors could sever it.
WTF is the rule in Shelley’s Case?
It’s an antiquated rule (pretty much no one follows it) that says a life estate with the remainder to that life estate holder’s heirs (e.g. “To A for life, then to A’s heirs” is essentially a fee simple absolute. However, since most folks don’t follow it, under that conveyance, A’s heirs really would have a recognizable future interest!
George and Georgia gave their farm to the City of Pleasantville with a warranty deed. The deed said “George and Georgia hereby grant our farm to the city of Pleasantville for the purpose of constructing a park thereon.” The city didn’t need another park and so sold it to Dorothy Developer who proceeded to build a strip mall on the property. Which of the following is true?
a) Upon selling the property to Dorothy, the property reverted to George and Georgia
b) The gift to the city created a fee simple determinable and an automatic possibility of reverter to George and Georgia
c) Dorothy took the farm as a fee simple absolute
d) The gift to the city created a fee simple determinable and a right of re-entry for Georga and Georgia
c) - G & G’s wish that the farmland be used for a park is not an actual condition subsequent. They didn’t use the magic words, “but only if used to construct a park” and so this gave the city an absolute right to sell in fee simple absolute to Dorothy.
Owen owned Greenacres in fee simple. He conveyed it to Alma, but if Baker is living 30 years from the date of this deed, then to Baker. The limitation to Baker is:
a) invalid
b) Valid, because B’s interest is a reversion
c) Valid, because B’s interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being
d) Valid, because B’s interest is vested subject to divestment
C - Baker is a life in being at the time of conveyance. He has a potential shifting executive interest subject to the RAP. The interest will vest or fail during his lifetime and thus doesn’t violate the RAP.
Alison owned camp D in fee simple. By her will she devised “Camp D to my grandchildren who reach the age of 21, this includes all after-born grandchildren.” At the time of her death, Alison had 4 kids and 3 grandkids. This devise is valid against the RAP because:
a) There is a presumption that Alison intended to only include those grandchildren born before her death
b) All of Alison’s children are measuring lives
c) Alison had 3 grandchildren at the time of her death and they must turn 21 within 21 years of her death
d) Alison could have had more children after the conveyance was made
b) Alison’s kids are measuring lives and she can’t have more at the time of conveyance because she dead. The gift must vest within 21 years of the deaths of Alison’s children and because their kids can turn 21 after no more than 21 years of their deaths, it is valid.
Batguy devised his Cave “to Kit Woman, her heirs and assigns, so long as they fight injustice, then to Bobin, his heirs and assigns.” What best describes the various interests created?
a) Kit woman has a fee simple determinable, Bobin has no interest, and Batguy’s heirs have a possibility of reverter
b) Kit woman has no interest, Bobin has no interest, and Batguys heirs have a fee simple
c) Kit Woman has a fee simple determinable and Bobin has a contingent remainder
d) Kit woman has a fee simple determinable and Bobin has a vested executory interest
a) The future gift to Bobin is void under the RAP (no certainty that the fighting injustice would/would not happen within 21 years of Kit Woman/Bobin’s death).
P purchased M’s department store property. At closing, P delivered a certified check for the balance due and gave P a warranty deed with full covenants to the property. The deed:
a) must be recorded to be valid between the parties
b) must recite the actual consideration given by P
c) must be in writing and contain the signature of both parties duly witnessed
d) usually represents an exclusive integration of the duties of the seller
d) the deed typically represents an integration of duties, meaning the PER would prohibit evidence of prior or contemporaneous dealings that conflict with the deed
L bought a tract of land from N for $250K. N revealed that there was a first mortgage on the property for $100K which would be satisfied by the proceeds of the sale. Effective Title Co’s title search revealed only the first mortgage. N did not reveal that there was a $50K second unrecorded mortgage on the property held by his father, V. The first mortgage was satisfied by the sale/closing and so L presumed he had clear title. A month later, V appeared and claimed that L was obligated to pay the principal and interest on the second mortgage. N has fled the jurisdiction. As among L, V. and Effective Title Co., which of the following is correct?
a) V will prevail since he had a valid second mortgage
b) Effective Title Co must pay on its title policy since it is an insurer
c) L’s failure to obtain an affidavit from N representing that there was no other mortgage outstanding will result in his taking subject to the V mortgage
d) L will take the property free of the V mortgage.
d) An unrecorded mortgage is not effective against third parties without notice
Smith purchased a tract of land. To protect himself, he ordered title insurance. The policy was the usual type issued by title companies. Accordingly,
a) The insurance company will not be permitted to take exceptions to its coverage if it agreed to prepare and insure the title abstract
b) The title policy is assignable if Smith subsequently sells the property
c) The title policy provides protection against any defects in title
d) The title company will be liable for any defects in the abstract of the chain of title which arises, even though the defect could not have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable care.
d) Title insurance protects the buyer against any chain of title defects not specified as exceptions in the policy. This is generally only for defects that are of record in the title abstract. (note - the abstract of title is a summary of all the legal documents pertaining to the land)
WTF is a purchase money mortgage?
A purchase money mortgage is one the buyer gives to the seller (often when the buyer has poor credit or not enough cash in hand) to offset the cost of buying the property (in other words, the purchase money mortgage replaces some of what they would have give to the seller).
M sold her farm to W and took back a purchase money mortgage on the farm. M failed to record the mortgage. M’s mortgage will be valid against all of the following parties except:
a) The heirs/estate of W
b) A subsequent mortgagee who took a second mortgage since he had heard there was a prior mortgage and failed to record it.
c) A subsequent bona fide purchaser from W
d) A friend of W to whom the farm was given as a gift and who took w/o knowledge of the mortgage
c) - generally a BFP who takes property without notice of other mortgages takes it free and clear
G sold his warehouse business to Clark Van Lines, Inc. the real property involved was encumbered by a recorded $300K first mortgage upon which G was personally liable. Clark’s Vine Lines acquired the property subject to the mortgage but did not assume the mortgage. 2 years later, when the outstanding mortgage was down to $260K, Clark decided to abandon the business location because it was unprofitable and worth less than the mortgage. C moved to another location and refused to pay the installments due on the mortgage. What is the legal status of the parties in regard to the mortgage?
a) Clark took the real property free of the mortgage
b) Clark breached its contract with G when it abandoned the location and defaulted on the mortgage
c) G must satisfy the mortgage debt in the event that foreclosure yields an amount less than the unpaid balance
d) If G pays off the mortgage, he will be able to successfully sue Clark because G is surrogated to the mortgagee’s rights against C.
c) the original mortgager is always potentially liable for a deficiency judgment in a purchase “subject to” the original mortgage. The mortgagee (likely a bank) has no rights against Clark.
Which of the following is an incorrect statement regarding a real property mortgage?
a) It transfers title of the real property to the mortgagee
b) it is usually accompanied by a negotiable promissory note that refers to the mortgage
c) It creates an interest in real property and is therefore subject to the SOF
d) It creates a nonpossessory security interest in the mortgagee
a) In a lien theory jurisdiction (the majority), a mortgage becomes a lien on property but legal title stays with the mortgagor; it does not transfer to the mortgagee until paid in full
M assigns his lease to F, although his lease forbids subletting. M’s landlord, T, objects to the assignment. Which of the following is correct?
a) A prohibition of the right to sublet contained in the lease completely prohibits an assignment
b) The assignment need not be in writing
c) The assignment does not extinguish’ M’s obligation to pay rent if F defaults
d) The assignment is invalid without T’s consent
c) The original tenant remains liable unless the landlord executes a release. A lease, including a lease assignment, must comply with the SOF. Note that the right to assign and sublet are separate rights.
Lorraine Lawstudent rented a flat in an apt house while she was attending law school. The landlord experienced financial difficulty and didn’t pay the electric bill. The power company turned off the electricity. The least advisable action for Lorraine to take is:
a) pay the electric bill and deduct the payment from her rent
b) withhold paying rent
c) vacate and terminate the lease
d) due for damages and seek the equitable remedy of specific performance
b) breach by one party (failure to pay electric bill) does not excuse performance by the other.
What is the difference between an easement appurtenant and an easement in gross?
An easement in gross involves only one parcel of land; and easement appurtenant involves two parcels of land.
How can an express cross-easement be terminated?
An express easement created by grant can only be terminated by abandonment, merger, or an instrument releasing the easement.
WTF is a profit a prendre?
A profit a prendre is the right to go upon the land of another and take some resource from it, but overuse, waste, or excessive taking is not allowed.
What are the SADD requirements for instruments like a deed/mortgage
SOF compliance (in writing, signed by seller), Acknowledgment (before a notary), Description, Delivery
What is the cause of action when one party wants to clear the chain of title to property?
A quiet title action.
What is necessary to create a covenant at law and how can a valid one be enforced in court?
A covenant at law (e.g. a restriction on how land can be used) requires: SOF compliance, intention for the promise to run with the land, it must “touch and concern” the land, and privity of the parties is necessary. Parties can sue for damages for violation of a covenant.
What is necessary to create an equitable servitude and how may they be enforced in court?
An equitable servitude (e.g. a restriction on how land can be used) requires: SOF compliance, intention for the promise to run with the land, it must “touch and concern” the land, and privity of the parties is NOT necessary. Parties can only sue for equitable remedies, not damages.
What is the difference between a reverter and a reversion?
A reverter is the right held by the grantor when land is conveyed by fee simple determinable, a reversion is when the land goes back to the grantor at the end of a life estate.
What types of future interests in land are subject to the RAP?
Executory interests (in a 3rd party) that come after certain conditional fee simple conveyances; vested, open, or contingent remainders that follow a life estate