Property Flashcards
Tenants in common
two or more owners w/o the right of survivorship
Co-tenant own individual part+ right to possess whole
Devisable, descendible, alienable
joint tenants
two or more owners w/ right of survivorship
Right of survivorship
Non-probate asset: unless only remaining tenant: then it is All yours to do as you will
Four unities essential to a joint tenancy (PITT)
If 4 unities don’t exist, a joint tenancy is not created, instead a tenancy in common is created
If 4 unities exist at the time the joint tenacy is created but are later severed, the joint tenancy turns into a tenancy in common when the unities cease to exist (destruction of any unity by a tenant destroys joint tenancy for that tenant)
Have to be explicitly stated now: “ to A and B as joint tenants and not as tenants in common ( with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common)”
Four unities essential to a joint tenancy (PITT)
Time:each joint tenant must be acquired or vest at the same time
Title: all joint tenants must acquire title by the same instrument or by a joint adverse possession. Joint tenancy can never arise by intestate succession or other act of law
Interest: all must have equal undivided shares and identical interest measured by duration ( same quantum)
Possession: each must have a right to possession of the whole ( one joint tenant can voluntarily give exclusive possession to the other joint tenant.
severance of Joint Tenancy
Sale: JT selss/transfers during lifetime
Partition
Voluntary: amicable end
Judicial:in kind ( physical division); forced sale (division of proceeds)
Mortgage
majority of states(lien theory): no severance
Minority of states ( titletheory): severance
tenancy by the entirety
can be created only in husband and wife, like joint tenancy in that the four unities plus a fifth ( unity of marriage) are required, and the surviving tenant has the right of survivorship
Neither husband nor wife can….
Defeat the right of survivorship of the other by a conveyance of a moiety to a third party
Acting alone have right to judicial partition of prop
Very protected form of co-ownership “ can’t touch this”
Creditors of only one spouse can’t touch tenancy for satisfaction of debt
Severance
Divorce terminates and tenancy in common forms
Death
Mutual agreement
Execution by a joint creditor of both spouses
rights and duties of co-tenants
Possession
No ouster ( wrongful exclusion from part/whole)
Rents and profits
None from co-tenant in exclusive possession (unless ouster)
Fair share if leased to 3rd party ( taxes, mortgages, etc)
Repairs
Contributions for reasonable necessary repairs w/ notice
Unilateral improvements
No contribution (credit at partition)
not commit waste
Types of waste
3 general categories of waste, impact of waste is economic waste
Affirmative waste(voluntary) : arising from voluntary acts, liability results from injurious acts (acts that substantially reduce the value of land)- some exceptions is mineral extraction
Permissive waste (neglect): arising from failure to act, negligence ( not paying taxes so land falls to forfeiture)
Ameliorative waste (unilateral change increasing value)- resulting from changes to the property, specifically changes that increase its value, by doing acts remainder or revision value cannot diminish
judicial partition
partition in kind preferred
forced sale allowed if fair/equitable physical division not possible
tenancy for years
Known fixed period of time
Termination automatic (on end date)
No notice needed to terminate
Writing typically needed if >1 year
periodic tenancy
Continues for successive intervals until properly terminated
express( L to T from month to month)
By implication
No mention of duration but rent at set intervals
Oral term of years violating SoF
Holdover tenant after lease ends
To terminate need notice
CL: at least equal to length of period
Month to month- 1 month
Week to week 1 week
Year to year: 1 month under restatement
tenancy at will
No fixed duration
Terminable at will of either party ( to T for as long as L or T desires
tenancy at sufference
T wrongfully holds over past lease expiration
L proceeds to recover rent
Terminates when L moves to evict or holds T to new tenancy
T’s duty to repair
if lease silent
Maintain premises
Make routine repairs
Not ordinary wear & tear repairs
Don’t commit waste
w/ express covenant
Maintain in good repair/condition
T may terminate if premises destroyed w/o T’s fault
Implied covent of quiet enjoyment (SING)
Breach by wrongful eviction: exclusion from whole or part of premises
Breach by constructive eviction: L renders premises unsuitable for occupancy
SI- substantial interference ( chronic/permanent problem)
N- notice ( T must notify L)
G- Goodbye/get out ( T must vacate)
implied warranty of habitability
Residential only
Premises must be fit for basic human habitation
Standard:case law and housing code
T’s options if L breaches ( MR3)
M- move
R-repair and deduct
R- reduce or withhold rent
R-remain & seek damages
Retaliatory eviction
L can’t terminate/penalize T in retaliation for T’s exercise of legal rights
implied warranty of habitability
Residential only
Premises must be fit for basic human habitation
Standard:case law and housing code
T’s options if L breaches ( MR3)
M- move
R-repair and deduct
R- reduce or withhold rent
R-remain & seek damages
Retaliatory eviction
L can’t terminate/penalize T in retaliation for T’s exercise of legal rights
fair housing act protected classes
Race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, disabled person
Dwellings need not be made available to ppl whose condition would create a direct threat to the health and safety of others or result in substantial damage to prop, but landlords must try to make reasonable accommodations
Landlord: the burden shifts to the housing provider/property manager to show a legally sufficient justification. means substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory purpose
Tenant: the tenant or applicant must establish liability by proving that the legitimate justification could be achieved by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect
lease agreement types of privity
For a general rule:, a lease agreement gives rise to two distinct relationships b/n the LL and the original tenant privity of estate and privity of contract
Privity : denotes a voluntary transactional relationship b/n 2+ people or entities
Whether oral or in writing, the lease b/n the landlord and the original tenant amounts to a conveyance of a right of possession from former to the latter= creates privity of estates , tenant holds for the LL
(Imposes a duty on the parties to perform only the lease terms that are said to run with the land 2 duties/covenenants that runs with the land = promise to pay rent, promise to repair )
If lease contains promises by one party to the other = creates privity of contract
If neither privity of estate nor privity of contract exists b/n the LL and the other party, the LL may not hold the other party liable for the terms
assignment
transfer of all property rights dor durational period
Assignee T in privity of estate w/ L
Liable on covenants that run with land (rent and repair)
Original T in privity of K (but not estate) w/ L
Liable for original lease obligations
Sublease
transfer portion of property rights for durational period
T2 has no privity ( estate or K ) w/ L
T1 & T2 responsible to each other
Relationship b/n L and T1 remains intact
caveat lessee (tenant beware)
L has no duty to make premises safe
EXCEPTIONS (CLAPS)
C-common areas ( hallways,elevators, etc)
L-latent defects (L must warn of hidden defects)
A- assumption of repairs- liable if repair negligently
P-public use rule- (short lease, significant defect, liable
4 any defects that cause injury
S-short-term lease of furnished dwelling , T doesn’t
have ability/time to repair
easements
A grant of a nonpossessory prop interest that entitles its holder to some form of use or enjoyment of another’s land
Use for specified purpose
Presumed to be of perpetual duration unless grant specifically limits the interes
types of easments
affirmative= the right to go onto/do something on servient land
negative= can only be created expressly, prevent servient landowner from doing something that would otherwise be permissible (LASS)
L-light
A-air
S-support
S-stream water from an artificial flow
easement appurtenant
Benefits holder in use/enjoyment of own land
2 parcels
dominant= derives benefit
Servient: bears burden
Passes automatically with transfers if the dominant tenement , regardless of whether it is even mentioned in the conveyance
Burden of easement aoourtenant passes automatically w/ sevient estates
easement in gross
Holder has personal/commercial advantage unrelated to use/enjoyment of land
Servient land burdened
No benefited/ dominant tenement
Examples
Right to place a billboard on another’s lot
Right to swim in anothers pond
Utility company’s right to lay power lines on another’s lot
Not transferable unless it is for the commercial purposes
Creation of affirmative easement (PING)
P- prescription ( adverse possession
Continuous uninterrupted use
Open and notorious
Actual but not exclusive
Hostile
I- implication
Preexisting use/ quasi easement
N- necessity
G- grant
In writing signed by thee holder of the servient tenement ( unless outside SoF)
Termination of easement (END CRAMP)
E- estoppel
Oral expression of n intent to abandon an easement won’t terminate an easement unless its also committed to writing or accompanied by action
Servient owner materially changes positions in reliance
N- necessity
When need ends unless easement was reduced to an express grant
D- destruction ( of servient land)
C-condemnation ( of servient land by gov eminent domain power wi)
R-release ( by holder to servient owner)
A- abandonment( physical action, an intent to never use easement again )
M- merger ( easements & servient land held by same person)
Prescription ( by servient owner)
license
Mere privilege to enter another’s land for narrow/delineated purpose
Creation
No writing required
Freely revocable at will of licensor
Profit
Entitles holder to enter servient land & take some resource
Creation, termination,alienation(transfer) = same as easements
Can also be extinguished through surcharge
Surcharge = misuse that overly burdens the servient estate)
Restrictive covenants
Covenant =promise to do or not do something
negative / restrictive= refrain from doing something ( i promise not to build for commercial purposes)
Affirmative = do something related to land ( I promise to maintain our shared fence)
Distinguish by remedy
Money damages: construe as covenant at law
Injunction: construe in equity as equitable servitude
Requirements for Burden to Run (WITHN)
W- writing
I-intent
Intended that the covenant would run
T-touch & concern
Affecting parcel owner in her use of that parcel of land
Affirmative covenants touch & concern the nad if they require the holder of the servient estates to do something that increases her obligations in connection with the land
H-HOrizontal & vertical privity
Horizontal ( original parties to the arrangement, grantor- grantee relationship not just two people agreeing )
Requires they be in succession of estate
They shared some interest in the land independent of the covenant
Vertical ( b/n original party and a successor to their interest)
Some non-hostile nexus such as K, devise, or descent
N- Notice
Successor must have had notice of the promise when she took possession
Requirements for benefit to run (WITV)
W- writing
I-intent
T- touch & concern
V- Vertical privity
Equitable servitude
Promise equity will enforce against successors of burdened land (regardless of whether it runs with land at law)
Bar exam= indicate want injunctive relief= triggers this
creation of Equitable servitude (WITNES)
W-writing
I- Intent
T- touch &concern
N- Notice
ES- Equitable servitude
implied equitable servitude (reciprocal negative servitude)
Under common scheme doctrine, ct will imply a reciprocal negative servitude to hold the unrestricted lot holder to the promise
Common scheme doctrine
Scheme of development ( including D’s lot) when sales began
D had notice of promise when they took
Notice in 3 forms (AIR)
A- actual = literal knowledge
I- inquiry= lay of land, general observation
R- record= public docs
If scheme arises after some lots ate sold, no implied servitude
Must be from inception
Equitable Defenses to enforcement ( ct will not enforce equitable servitude if)
Neighborhood conditions have change
Person seeking enforcement violating similar restriction on nown land ( unclean hands)
Benefited party acquiesced in violation of sevituded by a burden party
Benefitted party acted in way that reasonable person would have abandoned covenant (estoppel)
Benefitted party fails to bring suit w/i reasonable time (laches)
Adverse possession
unconventional means to title of a real prop. Acquired by acting as an owner for a specified length of time under claim of right or color of title
Possession for statutorily prescribed time can ripen into title if elements met (OCEAN)
AP Elements (OCEAN/ All Horses Eat Old Corn)
Actual Possession- physically on the land in possession/control and using it in the nature of the land
Accrues that statute of limitation must file for ejection to get a person to leave the property as a trespasser before SOL is over and they claim AP
Hostile, Adverse and under claim of right- Hostile and under claim of title, on the land and using it w/o T.O’s permission as if it was their own
Exclusive Possession- Exercise dominion over prop, using land in a way that excludes other ( T.O, another AP, anyone on land W/O AP permission)
Open and Notorious- use land in a way to put reasonably attentive owners on notice (Constructive notice), an ordinary person would notice a person is present and using the land
Objective test used to decide constructive notice
Reflects the sleeping principle: purpose to penalize the negligent and dormant owner for sleeping upon his rights
Continuous for the statutory period- continuous, not constant, can come and go in the ordinary course given the nature of the prop in question so long as it is for the duration of the statutory period