Property Flashcards
present estates overview & restraint on alienation
- fee simple absolute
- fee simple determinable
- fee simple subject to condition subsequent
- fee simple subject to executory interest
- life estate
*restraint on alienation: a grantor can place a reasonable restraint on the grantee’s ability to feely transfer, but a restraint on alienation is generally void when it purports to prohibit alienation of the estate and render any conveyance by the grantee void
*When the terms of a conveyance are ambiguous, courts typically adopt a preference for a fee simple subject to condition subsequent.
- fee simple absolute
absolute ownership
largest possessory state, capable of lasting forever
if ambiguous grant, creates fee simple
“O to A” means same thing as “O to A and his heirs”
- fee simple determinable
ownership terminates if a condition occurs and passes automatically to grantor
look for durational words: “as long as,” “until”
possibility of reverter is a future interest automatically retained by the grantor that becomes possessory upon the occurrence of the stated condition in a FSD
*“for the purpose of” is an FSA, not FSD
- fee simple subject to condition subsequent
when the condition occurs, the grantor can exercise a right of reentry (not automatic)
look for conditional words (“but if” “on condition” “provided that”) and words such as “right to reenter”
freely alienable by owner during his life, and upon his death is devisable and descendible
*The grantor must explicitly retain the right to terminate the fee simple subject to condition subsequent in the conveyance. Owner may or may not have a right to terminate, depending on whether the court would be willing to imply a forfeiture provision when none was expressly set forth in the deed.
- fee simple subject to executory interest
will end upon the happening of an event and the future interest will vest in a third party
held by the another transferee, not the grantor
“to A, but if liquor is served, then to B” –> B has an executory interest
springing executory interest: divests the grantor
shifting executory interest: divests a prior grantee
- life estate
ownership terminates upon the end of the measuring life
“for life”
can’t pass by will or intestate succession
future interest:
- if land goes back to grantor, he has a reversion
- if land goes to third party, third party takes a remainder
*required to pay property taxes but limited to financial benefit from property (if living there, measured by reasonable rental value of property)
concurrent estates overview
- tenants in common
- joint tenancy
- tenancy by the entirety
- rights & obligations of co-tenants
- tenancy in common
*the default concurrent interest
each tenant owns a separate but undivided interest in the entire property (can possess the whole)
this interest is freely devisable or transferable
- joint tenancy
right of survivorship: when one joint tenant ides, the interest goes to the other joint tenants
must have express language creating a joint tenancy along with survivorship language
must have 4 unities (PITT): possession, interest, time, title
-each joint tenant has equal right to possess the whole property, interest equal to others, at the same time, and in the same instrument
severance of joint tenancy:
- if one joint tenant conveys his interest, it severs the JT
- creates a tenancy in common
- mortgages:
- majority: lien theory: mortgage treated as lien, doesn’t destroy JT
- minority: title theory: severs title, converted to TIC
- leases:
- some jurisdictions hold the lease severs the JT
- others treat lease as temporary suspension of JT
- tenancy by the entirety
joint tenancy btw spouses (marriage is 5th unity)
- has right of survivorship
- can’t alienate/encumber shares without consent of spouse
- “as tenants by the entirety, with a right of survivorship”
- possession
-ouster
each co-tenant has the right to possess the entire property
ouster: a co-tenant who is being denied access can bring a court action to regain access to the property
adverse possession: if one co-tenant ousted the other, he can make a claim for AP if he meets the requirements
- rent
a co-tenant does not owe rent for his use of the property
a co-tenant must share rents received from 3rd parties (divided based on ownership interest)
- operating expenses
necessary charges, such as taxes or mortgage interest payment
a co-tenant can collect contribution for other co-tenants for payments in excess of her share of operating expenses
*however, a co-tenant in sole possession can collect only for the amount that exceeds the rental value of the property
- repairs, improvements, & partition
repairs:
- no right to reimbursement from co-tenants even for necessary repairs
- but co-tenant who made repairs can get credit in partition action
- when a 3rd party is occupying the property, a co-tenant who collects rent from the 3rd party can subtract expenses for necessary repairs from the rent received before sharing the rent with other co-tenants
improvements:
- no right to reimbursement for improvements
- but co-tenant who makes repairs can get credit in partition action
partition:
- equitable remedy for TIC or JT
- court divides property into distinct portion, preference for physical partition (partition in kind), but partition by sale if physical isn’t practical or not fair
- proceeds from partition by sale are divided among co-tenants based on ownership interests
- agreements not to partition are enforceable if it’s clear & time limitation is reasonable
types of leaseholds
- tenancy for years: created by express agreement for fixed period of time
- SoF applies if longer than 1 year
- termination automatic upon expiration of term (or before by agreement or material breach)
- Termination of a tenancy for years may occur before the expiration of the term, such as when the tenant surrenders the leasehold. A tenant surrenders a lease by offering to return the lease to the landlord and the landlord accepting the return. - periodic tenancy: repetitive, ongoing estate measured by set periods that automatically renew (month-to-month)
- can be created by express agreement, implication, or operation of law
- SoF does not apply
- valid notice of termination is required (in writing, given before beginning of intended last period) - tenancy at will: no fixed period of time, may be terminated by either party at any time
- if agreement only gives landlord right to terminate at will, tenant also gets right to terminate by implication (not other way around)
- if landlord or tenant dies, tenancy at will is terminated
-Termination rights in at-will tenancies can be limited if they are not unconscionable - tenancy at sufferance: a tenant wrongfully holds over past the expiration of the lease, lasts until eviction or landlord re-rents to tenant
tenant’s duties
pay rent, avoid waste, and make reasonable repairs
withholding/deduction of rent
-if landlord breaches covenant of quiet enjoyment or implied warranty of habitability
waste: tenant cannot damage the property and must repair damage he causes
- can’t commit affirmative or permissive waste, but can make ameliorative waste (improve, usually require permission, and can be prohibited in lease)
failure to pay rent: landlord can sue for damages & eviction
abandonment: if tenant abandons the property, landlord can accept as an offer of surrender
landlord duties overview
- duty to repair
- implied warranty of habitability
- covenant of quiet enjoyment
- duty to mitigate damages
- duty to deliver possession:
- majority: must deliver actual possession of property
- minority: only required to deliver legal possession
- tort liability:
- common law: responsible for latent (hidden) defects about which tenant not warned, faulty repairs by landlord, and negligence causing injuries in common areas
- modern trend: landlords have duty of reasonable care
- duty to repair
landlord must repair damages under residential leases, unless the tenant caused the damages
- implied warranty of habitability
- only applies to residential leases
- cannot be waived
landlord must maintain the property such that it is reasonably suited for residence
-e.g. failure to provide heat, electricity, running water, or plumbing
failing to comply with housing codes is a breach, especially violations related to health or safety
tenant must give notice to landlord and reasonable opportunity to repair
if landlord fails to make repairs, tenant may:
- stay in property & refuse to pay rent
- stay in property, pay for repairs, and deduct cost from rent, or
- terminate the lease and move out
- covenant of quiet enjoyment
*applies to residential & commercial leases
the landlord must not disrupt the tenant’s possession or enjoyment of the property
-controls common areas & nuisance of other tenants
actual eviction: landlord must remove tenant from premises
partial eviction: tenant prevented from possessing/using portion of leased premises
-excused from paying rent for entire premises if landlord responsible for partial eviction
constructive eviction:
- landlord substantially interferes with tenant’s use & enjoyment of the land
- tenant gives notice of the problem & reasonable time for landlord to repair, but landlord does not repair, and
- tenant vacates premises in reasonable amount of time
assignment/sublease
assignment:
- a transfer of the tenant’s remaining lease to a new party
- generally allowed, unless prohibited by lease
- landlord can collect rent from tenant or subsequent tenant
sublease:
- a transfer of a portion of the tenant’s lease (rather than remainder)
- landlord can collect rent from tenant
prohibition clauses: a clause in the lease prohibiting assignment or sublease
- if the lease prohibits only assignments, the tenant may still sublease
- if tenant violates prohibition, landlord can terminate the lease
- -> waiver: if landlord accepts payment from new tenant, he waives the right to enforce the prohibition clause
- consent: some clauses allow assignment or sublease only with landlord’s consent
- -> landlord can only withhold consent on a commercially reasonable ground
duty to mitigate damages
landlord has duty to make reasonable efforts to re-rent the property to mitigate the damages from tenant leaving early/evicted
(doesn’t under minority rule, more common in commercial leases)
adverse possession
allows person in unlawful possession (trespasser) to acquire good title
- new title relates back to date of person’s entry onto property
- property owned by government can’t be adversely possessed
- continuous:
- seasonal/infrequent use suffices if use is consistent with type of property being possessed
- can tack on her predecessor’s time on property if current possessor in privity with prior one
- SOL doesn’t run against true owner who has disability at time AP begins
- true owner can interrupt by ejecting AP, stops the clock - open & notorious: such that reasonable true owner would become aware of the claim
- hostile: possess without owner’s permission
- majority: ignores AP’s state of mind
- minority:
- -> good faith: AP’s claim is hostile if truly thinks land is unowned or that she’s rightful owner
- -> bad faith: AP knows land isn’t hers and tries to acquire title by AP - actual & exclusive: actual, physical possession of property, not shared with true owner
ECHO: exclusive, continuous, hostile, open & notorious
valid deed requirements
must identify the property and the parties, must be signed, and must include words of transfer
rule: to transfer a real property interest, the grantor must demonstrate the intent to make a present transfer of the interest and the grantee must accept the interest. in addition, pursuant to the SoF, the transfer of real property must be evidenced by a writing. must include all necessary terms such as grantor’s signature, named grantee, words of transfer, and a description of property. consideration is not required
intent to transfer a valid deed
- transfer to grantee: creates presumption of intent to transfer
* parol evidence is admissible to show that the grantor lacks such intent. but when grantor transfers deed to grantee subject to a condition that does not appear in the deed (oral condition), parol evidence is not admissible and the condition is not enforceable
*Delivery is presumed when the deed has been recorded - transfer to third party agents:
a. if grantor gives deed to independent third party for delivery to grantee upon a condition, the deed will not be deemed delivered if the grantor reserves the right to take the deed back
b. if the grantor does not reserve the right to take the deed back, the grantor’s intent to presently transfer the property is determined by the facts
- if grantor intended to presently transfer, he cannot void the gift later
- if grantor did not intend to presently transfer, transfer is not valid - testamentary transfer: if the grantor gives the deed to an independent third party for delivery upon the grantor’s death, the grantor’s intent to make a present transfer is determined by the facts
- if the grantor intended to transfer only upon his death, it is not a present intent to transfer
- such a transfer is a testamentary transfer and must meet the requirements of a will (written, signed, witnesses)
recording acts overview
a valid deed does not need to be recorded to convey good title, but it’s a good idea to record bc it establishes priorities among conflicting claims
*although recording the deed raises the presumption of delivery, that presumption is rebuttable by facts indicating the grantor’s contrary intent
recording acts also apply to easements, covenants, servitudes; mortgages for priority purposes; deeds
protects subsequent purchasers
not protected: grantees who acquire title by gift, intestacy, or devise
types of recording statutes & bona fide purchaser (BFP) & shelter rule & estoppel by deed
notice statute: if a person purchases land without notice of a prior interest, the person will prevail in an ownership dispute against the prior interest
- “in good faith” “without notice”
- actual notice
- inquiry notice: reasonable investigation would’ve disclosed prior claim (dude on land or mentioned interest)
- constructive notice: grantees are on notice of anything recorded in the chain of title
race statute: the first person to record their deed will prevail in an ownership dispute, regardless of knowledge
-“first to record”
race-notice jurisdiction: if a person purchases land without notice of the prior interest, and records first, the person will prevail in an ownership dispute against the prior interest
*just has to purchase as BFP, can record after finds out about prior interest though
bona fide purchaser:
- someone who pays value for the property and takes it without notice of prior claims (actual, inquiry, constructive)
- notice and race-notice statutes protect BFPs
shelter rule: allows grantors who are protected by the recording act to shelter their grantees who would otherwise be unprotected
estoppel by deed: grantor conveys land he doesn’t own, estopped from trying to repossess if later acquires title
rights in land overview
- easements
- covenants
- equitable servitudes
easement overview
an easement is the right to use land:
- the dominant estate benefits from the easement
- the servient estate is being burdened by the easement
classification of easement:
- appurtenant: attached to the land
- -> will usually continue after land is transferred
- in gross: specific to the person
types of easements
express easement: must be in writing & satisfy SoF
easement by necessity:
- only when property is virtually useless (landlocked)
- dominant and servient estates must have been owned in common by one person and necessity at severance
- ends when no longer necessary
easement by implication:
- common ownership, before severance owner uses land as if is easement on it
- after severance, use must be continuous and apparent
- use must be reasonably necessary to dominant estate’s use & enjoyment
easement by prescription:
-like adverse possession, same elements except for exclusivity
easement by estoppel:
- starts with permissive use (license), reliance, permission withdrawn
- if reliance was detrimental then estopped from withdrawing permission
scope, duty to maintain, & termination of easement
scope of express easement:
- determined by terms when created
- changes in use must be reasonably foreseeable
- if use exceeds scope, then trespass
- but an increase in the scope of an easement for the benefit of property other than the dominant estate is not permitted.
scope of implied easement:
-determined by nature of prior use or necessity
owner of easement has duty to maintain property subject to easement
*if the easement is shared, owner who maintains/repairs it may seek contribution from other easement owners o after adequate notice & opportunity to participate in repair decisions (owner of servient estate also has obligation to contribute to repair/maintenance of easement if servient estate owner uses the easement)
can be terminated in a number of ways:
-release, abandonment, agreement, merger, end of necessity, if the purchaser of the burdened land can show he is a BFP (no notice of easement)
covenant
covenants usually involve a promise to do or not do something in relation to land
-determine who is the benefited party and who is the burdened party
requirements for covenant to run with the land:
- writing
- intent
- touch & concern (benefit or burden must affect both parties)
- notice (actual, constructive, inquiry)
- horizontal privity: only required for burden to run
- estate & covenant contained in same instrument - vertical privity:
- concerns the relationship btw the original party & the successor party
- burden: for burden to run with the land, the owner must transfer the entire interest (strict vertical privity)
- benefit: the benefit will run if the successor takes any portion of the original estate
*A covenant can be terminated in the same manner as an easement, including by abandonment. Abandonment occurs when an affirmative act—something more than neglect or nonuse—shows a clear intent to relinquish the covenant.