Property Flashcards
Does one JT’s execution of a mortgage bind the other JT (who did not sign) upon the signer’s death?
Under the (majority) lien theory, a mortgage does not trigger a severance -> thus, the surviving JT who did not sign the mortgage receives full title free and clear of the mortgage.
Under the (minority) title theory, a mortgage creates a severance of the JT, creating a TIC. Thus the surviving partner would keep one-half, free of the mortgage they did not sign, and the heirs of the JT who signed the mortgage would inherit one-half, subject to the mortgage .
What are T’s obligations when they are partially evicted?
Even though the tenant continues in possession of the remainder of the premises, partial eviction by the LL relieves the tenant of the obligation to pay rent for the entire premises.
In contrast, partial eviction by a paramount title holder results in an apportionment of rent; i.e., it relieves the tenant of the obligation to pay rent NOT for the entire premises, but only for the portion of the premises from which he was evicted. The tenant remains liable for the reasonable rental value of the portion that he continues to possess.
Does the covenant of quiet enjoyment apply to conduct of a third-party?
No. It only applies where the LL’s conduct has rendered the property uninhabitable
If the buyer of land determines that the seller’s title is unmarketable, what can the buyer do?
The buyer must notify the seller and give her reasonable time to cure, even if this requires extending the closing date, and even if time is of the essence. If the seller fails to cure the defects, then the buyer may rescind the contract, sue for damages for breach, get specific performance with abatement of the purchase price, or (in some jurisdictions) require the seller to quiet title
Does an easement render title unmarketable?
Easements are generally considered encumbrances that render title unmarketable. BUT, a beneficial easement that was visible or known to the buyer does not constitute an encumbrance
Does a de minimus zoning violation render title unmarketable?
Yes, unless the title holder is able to get the zoning authority to grant a permanent variance
If a property is possessed by a life estate, with a remainder held in another party, will an adverse possessor obtain title to the land?
No. The adverse possessor will get possession of the life estate, but will be ejected by the remainder holder once the former life estate holder dies.
What is color of title?
Color of title is a document that purports to give title, but for reasons not apparent from its face does not
When does the true owner’s disability (infancy, insanity, imprisonment) toll the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim?
For a disability, such as status as a minor, to stop the clock, the disability must have been in existence on the day the adverse possession began
If a party assumes a mortgage from the original mortgagor, who can the mortgagee go after should there be a default?
When a grantee assumes the mortgage, the grantee expressly promises the grantor-mortgagor that he will pay the mortgage obligation as it becomes due. The mortgagee then becomes a third-party beneficiary of the grantee’s promise to pay and can sue the grantee directly if the grantee fails to pay. After the assumption, the grantor-mortgagor becomes a surety who is secondarily liable to the mortgagee on the note if the grantee fails to pay. The grantee and the original mortgagor are jointly liable, even though the grantee is primarily liable and the original mortgagor is secondarily liable as a surety
If a mortgagee and an assuming grantee subsequently modify the original obligation, can the original mortgagor be held liable for any part of the original obligation?
No. When a mortgagee and an assuming grantee subsequently modify the original obligation, the original mortgagor is completely discharged of liability
What happens when a grantor purports to convey property that he does not own, but subsequently acquires title?
When a grantor purports to convey property that he does not own, his subsequent acquisition of title to that property vests in the grantee under the doctrine of estoppel by deed. Most courts, however, hold that this is personal estoppel, which means that title inures to the grantee’s benefit only as against the grantor, not a subsequent bona fide purchaser. If the grantor transfers his after-acquired title to an innocent purchaser for value, the bona fide purchaser gets good title
What are the six warranties that protect purchasers of property against defects in title?
Present covenants: seisin, right to convey, and freedom from encumbrances
Future covenants: warranty, quiet enjoyment, and future assurances
covenant of seisin
in which the grantor covenants that they have title and possession to the estate they are purporting to convey.
covenant of right to convey
in which the grantor covenants that they have the authority to make the grant (which is satisfied by their title)
covenant against encumbrances
in which the grantor covenants against the existence of any physical (e.g., encroachments) or title (e.g., mortgage) encumbrances.