Professional standards and ethics Flashcards
The need for professional standards
Important for users of financial statements that their reliability does not vary from company to company
Financial Reporting Council
Established to promote good financial reporting through the setting of accounting standards and review of published financial statements
Codes and Standards Committee - Actuarial policy, audit and assurance, corporate governance and accounting and reporting policy
Conduct Committee - Audit quality review, corporate reporting review, professional discipline and oversight, supervisory inquiries
How does the FRC promote improvements in audit quality?
Audit standards (ISAs) - describe auditor responsibilities and approaches
Ethical standards (ES) - objectivity
Practice notes - eg. professional scepticism
Monitors compliance with ISA /ES via its Audit Quality Review Team
Oversees matters of misconduct and has power to take disciplinary action against auditors and firms
Oversees the UK code of Corporate Governance - outlines responsibilities of the Audit Committees to oversee the external audit function
Professional scepticism
Adopting a questioning mind
Being alert to conditions which may indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud
Critically assessing audit evidence
Why is professional scepticism nesseccary?
Management may deliberately conceal fraud / be biased in the creation of financial statements
Evidence may not be reliable
Financial statements contain complex judgemental issues
Professional scepticism ensures…
Sufficient enquiry and challenges to management
Scrutiny of accounting policies, documents and responses for reliability
Contradictory evidence / conditional indicative of fraud followed up
Big data allows the auditor to…
Monitor large sets of data rather than samples
Mine unstructured sets of data to identify anomalies, patterns, trends and usual relationships for further investigation
Audit data analytics
The use of big data on an audit
Allows the auditor to monitor large sets of data rather than samples and mine unstructured sets of data to identify anomalies / trends for further investigation
Provide a better quality audit
Reduce risk and liability for the auditor
Technological developments with implications for accounting and auditing
Audit data analytics
Robotic process automation
AI & cognitive computing
Blockchain
Reviews that could influence the future of audit
Kingman Review
Competitions and Market Authority’s review
Brydon Report
Kingman review recommendations
December 2018
Followed high profile corporate collapses (eg. Carillion)
Abolishing the FRC and replacing it with a new Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority to directly regulate the biggest audit firms
Imposing greater sanctions in cases of corporate failure
Requiring rapid explanations from companies
Publishing reports about company’s conduct and management
Competitions and Market Authority’s review recommendations
Greater oversight of audit committees and the role they play to ensure audit quality
Splitting the Big Four’s audit and non-audit businesses to ensure focus and quality
Five year review of the state of the industry
Mandatory joint audits to increase the ability of smaller firms to compete with the Big Four
Brydon Report recommendations
Separating of the audit and accounting professions
Redefining of audit and its purpose
Introducing ‘suspicion’ into qualities of audit
Increasing audit responsibilities beyond the financial statements
Greater engagement with shareholders
Changing the language of the opinion given
Greater clarity around the role of the audit committee
Improving auditor transparency
International Federation for Accountants (IFAC) boards
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) (2020)
ISSB reporting standards
IFRS 1 - General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information
IFRS 2 - Climate-related disclosures