Professional Responsibility [Highly Tested Rules] Flashcards
What are the ways a lawyer-client relationship can be formed?
A lawyer-client relationship may be formed:
1. by express oral or written agreement between the lawyer and client;
2. by implied agreement; OR
3. by a court’s appointment of counsel
How is a lawyer-client relationship formed by implied agreement?
A lawyer-client relationship is formed by implied agreement when:
1. a prospective client seeks legal advice or services from a lawyer in their professional capacity;
2. the lawyer fails to make clear that he does not want to undertake the representation; and
3. the lawyer knows or should know that the prospective client is reasonably relying on the lawyer to provide the legal services
Which descisions are the client’s to make, and which decisions are the lawyer’s?
A lawyer must abide by the client’s substantive decisions after the lawyer has consulted with the client, and the lawyer is responsible for employing the appropriate legal strategy
The client has the final decision as to:
1. whether to accept a settlement offer;
2. what plea to enter;
3. whether to waive a jury trial in a criminal case; AND
4. whether the client will testify in a criminal case
When may a lawyer limit the scope of a representation?
A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if:
1. the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances; AND
2. the client gives informed consent
What are the rules regarding advising or assisting a client in criminal or fraudulent conduct?
ABA: A lawyer must NOT counsel or assist the client in illegal or fraudulent conduct
* The lawyer may advise the client of the legal consequences of a proposed course of action, but if the client insists on pursuing an illegal or unethical course of conduct, the lawyer must withdraw
CA: The California rule also prohibits a lawyer from assisting a client in conduct that violates a court rule or ruling
* The commentary also provides that, if California law conflicts with federal or tribal law (e.g., with respect to marijuana laws), the lawyer must inform the client about the related federal or tribal law or policy
To whom does a lawyer owe a duty when the client is an organization?
When a lawyer’s client is an organization, the lawyer represents and owes a duty to the organization, not the people associated with the organization, and the lawyer must explain this whenever the organization’s interests are adverse to those of the individuals at the organization with whom the lawyer is dealing
What must a lawyer do to protect an organizational client’s interests?
If a lawyer learns that a person associated with the organization has acted, or is about to act, in violation of a duty to the organization or the law in a way that might be imputed to the organization, the lawyer must proceed as reasonably necessary to protect the organization’s interests, which ordinarily involves reporting the matter to a higher authority in the organization
Outside Reporting:
If the highest authority in the organization fails to act, the lawyer may (but is not required to) report the information to appropriate persons outside the organization to the extent that reporting is necessary to prevent substantial injury to the organization
* CA: The CA Rules do NOT authorize outside reporting UNLESS an exception to the duty of confidentiality applies; if the highest authority in the organization fails to take action, the lawyer may withdraw
When MUST a lawyer withdraw from (or decline to accept) a representation?
A lawyer MUST decline to take on a representation, or MUST withdraw from representation, if:
1. the representation will result in a violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law;
2. the lawyer’s physical or mental condition substantially impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client;
3. the lawyer is discharged by the client; OR
4. CA: the client is bringing an action, conducting a defense, asserting a position in litigation, or taking an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person
When MAY a lawyer withdraw from a representation under the ABA Rules?
Under the ABA Rules, a lawyer MAY withdraw from representation if:
1. the client persists in a criminal or fraudulent course of action involving the lawyer’s services;
2. the client has already used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime or fraud;
3. the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer (e.g., paying bills) and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw if the obligation is not fulfilled;
4. the representation has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client;
5. the client insists on taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement;
6. the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer; OR
7. withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the client’s interests
EXCEPTION: When court ordered to do so, a lawyer must continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation
When MAY a lawyer withdraw from a representation under the CA Rules?
Under the CA Rules, a lawyer MAY withdraw from representation if:
1. the client persists in a criminal or fraudulent course of action involving the lawyer’s services;
2. the client has already used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime or fraud;
3. the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer (e.g., paying bills) and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw if the obligation is not fulfilled;
4. the representation has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client;
5. the lawyer is unable to work with co-counsel, and withdrawing would serve the client’s interests;
6. the lawyer’s mental or physical condition makes it “difficult” to continue representing the client (but not severe enough to require mandatory withdrawal); OR
7. the client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the representation
EXCEPTION: When court ordered to do so, a lawyer must continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation
What must a lawyer do upon termination of a representation?
When terminating representation, a lawyer must take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests, such as:
1. giving reasonable notice to the client;
2. affording the client time to retain other counsel;
3. surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled; AND
4. refunding any unearned advance payments
What does the duty of competence require?
A lawyer owes a duty of competence to their client, which requires the lawyer to apply the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation, including by keeping abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology
* CA: The CA Rules also require the lawyer to apply the mental, emotional, and physical ability reasonably necessary for the performance of legal services
* EXCEPTION: In an emergency, a lawyer may give advice or assistance to a client in a matter in which the lawyer would ordinarily lack competence, but such assistance should be limited to that reasonable necessary under the circumstances
What does the duty of competence require when a lawyer lacks knowledge or experience?
If a lawyer lacks knowledge or experience in a particular field, the lawyer must NOT undertake the representation UNLESS:
1. the lawyer acquires sufficient knowledge and skill through necessary study before performance is required; OR
2. the lawyer associates or consults with a lawyer of established competence in the field
CA: The CA Rules provide that a lawyer must not intentionally, recklessly, repeatedly, or with gross negligence fail to perform legal services with reasonable competence
* This means that a California lawyer generally is NOT subject to discipline for a minor, isolated breach of the duty of competence
What does the duty of diligence require?
A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, which includes:
1. controlling their workload so that each matter can be handled competently; AND
2. acting with commitment and dedication to the client’s interests
CA: The CA Rules provide that a lawyer must not intentionally, recklessly, repeatedly, or with gross negligence fail to perform legal services with reasonable diligence
* This means that a California lawyer generally is NOT subject to discipline for a minor, isolated breach of the duty of diligence
What does the duty to communicate require?
The duty to communicate requires a lawyer to:
1. explain the matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation;
2. promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance that requires the client’s informed consent;
3. reasonably consult with the client about legal strategy;
4. keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, including all significant developments;
5. promptly comply with the client’s reasonable requests for information; AND
6. consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by law or ethical rules
What does the duty to communicate require with respect to plea bargains and settlement offers under the ABA Rules?
Under the ABA Rules, a lawyer must promptly inform the client of any settlement offer or proffered plea bargain unless the client has previously (1) indicated that the proposal will be acceptable or unacceptable or (2) authorized the lawyer to accept or reject the offer
What does the duty to communicate require with respect to plea bargains and settlement offers under the CA Rules?
Under the CA Rules, a lawyer must ALWAYS promptly communicate the following to a client, regardless of the circumstances:
1. in a criminal case, all terms and conditions of a proposed plea bargain or other dispositive offer; AND
2. in all other matters, all amounts, terms and conditions of any written settlement offer
> NOTE: In accordance with the general duty to communicate, an oral settlement offer must be communicated to the client if it constitutes a significant development (which will almost always be the case)
When may a lawyer withhold information from a client under the ABA Rules?
Under the ABA Rules, a lawyer may delay communicating information to a client if the client would be likely to react imprudently to an immediate communication
NOTE: The lawyer may only delay disclosure; the lawyer must eventually disclose the information
When may a lawyer withhold information from a client under the CA Rules?
Under the CA Rules, a lawyer may delay communicating information to a client only if the lawyer reasonably believes that the client would be likely to react in a way that may cause imminent harm to the client or others
NOTE: The lawyer may only delay disclosure; the lawyer must eventually disclose the information
What do the CA Rules specifically require a lawyer to disclose to a client regarding professional liability insurance?
The CA Rules provide that:
* when a lawyer does NOT have professional liability insurance, they must inform the client in writing at the time of engagement
* if a lawyer loses their professional liability insurance during the representation, they must inform the client within 30 days
EXCEPTIONS: Disclosure is NOT required when:
1. the representation will not exceed 4 hours;
2. the lawyer is acting within their direct employment as a government lawyer or in-house counsel; OR
3. the lawyer is rendering legal services in an emergency
What does the duty of confidentiality require?
A lawyer must NOT reveal any information relating to the representation of a client, regardless of the source of information, unless an exception applies
* The duty of confidentiality requires a lawyer to take reasonable measures to prevent unauthorized access to, or inadvertent disclosure of, the client’s confidential information
What is the scope and duration of the duty of confidentiality?
SCOPE:
The duty of confidentiality applies regardless of whether the client requested that it be kept “confidential” or whether its revelation might harm or embarrass the client; it applies regardless of the source of the information, and it prevents all types of disclosure
DURATION:
The duty of confidentiality applies to information gained during consultations with prospective clients, even if the lawyer is not hired, and it continues to apply after the lawyer-client relationship has terminated and even after the client has died
What are the exceptions to the duty of confidentiality under the ABA Rules?
Under the ABA Rules, a lawyer may disclose confidential information:
1. if the client gives informed consent;
2. if the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation;
3. to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm;
4. to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to cause substantial financial loss to a person (or to rectify or mitigate the financial loss if the crime or fraud has already been committed), and the client is using or has used the lawyer’s services in furtherance of the crime or fraud;
5. to collect a legal fee or defend the lawyer from some charge or claim of wrongdoing;
6. to obtain confidential legal ethics advice;
7. to detect or address conflicts of interest resulting from an organizational change (e.g., change of employment, merger, or purchase of a law practice); OR
8. to comply with a court order or other law
NOTE: Even where an exception applies, the lawyer may disclose a client’s confidential information only to the extent reasonably necessary to meet the exception
What are the exceptions to the duty of confidentiality under the CA Rules?
Under the CA Rules, a lawyer may disclose confidential information:
1. if the client gives informed consent;
2. to prevent a future criminal act that is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm; provided that, before disclosure, the lawyer must, if reasonable under the circumstances, (i) make a good faith effort to persuade the client not to commit or continue the criminal act or to pursue a course of conduct that will prevent the crime, and (ii) inform the client of the lawyer’s ability or decision to disclose the confidential information;
3. to collect a legal fee or defend the lawyer against some charge or claim of wrongdoing; OR
4. when compelled by court order or other law
NOTE: Even where an exception applies, the lawyer may disclose a client’s confidential information only to the extent reasonably necessary to meet the exeption
What is the attorney-client privilege, and when does it terminate?
The attorney-client privilege allows a client to refuse to testify and prevent their lawyer from testifying before a court or other government tribunal about confidential communications between them or their respective agents that pertain to legal services
* The attorney-client privilege attaches to consultations with prospective clients and continues after the representation ends
CA: In California, the attorney-client privilege terminates after the client’s death when the client’s estate is settled and the personal representative is discharged
What are the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege?
The attorney-client privilege does NOT apply:
1. where the client seeks the attorney’s services to enable or aid anyone to commit a future crime or fraud
2. to a communication that is relevant to an issue of breach (by either lawyer or client) of the duties arising out of the attorney-client relationship
3. where the client otherwise puts the legal services at issue in the case
4. in civil litigation between multiple persons who were formerly the joint clients of the lawyer
5. to a communication that is relevant to a dispute between persons claiming through the same deceased client
6. CA: when disclosure is necessary to prevent a CRIMINAL act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in substantial bodily injury or death to any person
What does the duty of loyalty require?
A lawyer owes a duty of loyalty to his client and must avoid conflicts of interest
What are the consequences of failing to avoid or properly address conflicts of interest?
A lawyer’s failure to avoid or properly address a conflict of interest can result in:
1. disqualification as counsel in a litigated matter;
2. professional disciplinary action; AND/OR
3. civil liability for legal malpractice
What is imputed disqualification, and when does it not apply?
Generally, a lawyer’s disqualifying conflict of interest is imputed to his entire firm
* “Firm” means any group of lawyers who practice closely together
EXCEPTIONS:
An imputed disqualification can be waived with the informed consent of the affected client, and imputed disqualification does NOT apply:
1. when the conflict is uniquely personal to the disqualified lawyer AND would not materially limit the representation of the client by the other lawyers in his firm (e.g., a conflict based on the lawyer’s sexual relationship with a client); OR
2. when the conflict is based on certain situations involving the disqualified lawyer’s prior representation or employment, or the disqualified lawyer’s consultation with a prospective client AND:
(i) the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from the matter, meaning they do not work on the matter, discuss it with those who do, or have access to case files
(ii) the disqualified lawyer does not share in the fee from the matter (although receiving a general salary or partnership share is fine)
(iii) the affected client is given notice to ensure compliance
(iv) CA: if the disqualifying conflict is based on the disqualified lawyer’s relationship to a former firm’s client, the CA Rules also provide that the imputation will be cured only if the disqualified lawyer did not substantially participate in the same or substantially related matter giving rise to the conflict at such former firm
When does a concurrent conflict exist?
As a general rule, a lawyer must NOT represent a client if a concurrent conflict exists
A concurrent conflict exists if
1. the client will be directly adverse to another client who is represented by the lawyer (whether in the same or a separate matter); OR
2. there is a significant risk that the representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s personal interests or by the lawyer’s duties to another client, a former client, or a third person
When may a lawyer undertake a representation despite a concurrent conflict?
Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict, a lawyer MAY still undertake the representation IF:
1. the lawyer reasonably believes that they can competently and diligently represent each affected client despite the conflict (an objective “reasonably prudent and competent lawyer” standard);
2. the representation is not prohibited by law;
3. the representation does not involve asserting a claim by one client against another client represented by that lawyer in the same proceeding before a tribunal (i.e., the lawyer cannot represent parties on opposite sides of the same litigation); AND
4. each affected client gives [ABA: informed consent, confirmed in writing]
[CA: informed written consent]
What is the rule regarding concurrent conflicts in criminal cases?
Although many concurrent conflicts of interest are resolvable by client consent in civil cases, the ABA and CA Rules caution against representing co-defendants in a criminal case due to the high likelihood that their interests will diverge
Under the CA Rules, what types of relationships must a lawyer ALWAYS disclose to a client?
Even where a “material limitation” conflict is not present, the CA Rules provide that a lawyer must always provide the client written disclosure of the following relationships:
1. the lawyer (or another lawyer in their firm) has a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with, or responsibility to, a party or witness in the client’s matter; OR
2. the lawyer (or another lawyer in their firm) is an immediate family member of, lives with, is in an intimate personal relationship with, or is a client of the firm of, another party’s attorney in the client’s matter
What is a disqualifying “former client” conflict?
A lawyer must NOT represent a client whose interests are materially adverse to those of a former client in a matter that is the same or substantially related to a matter in which the lawyer represented the former client UNLESS the former client gives:
ABA: informed consent, confirmed in writing
CA: informed written consent
When are two matters “substantially related” for purposes of former client conflicts?
Two matters are “substantially related” if:
1. they involve the same transaction or legal dispute; OR
2. there is a substantial risk that confidential factual information that would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the client’s position in the subsequent matter
What is a disqualifying conflict with a client of the lawyer’s former firm?
If a lawyer’s former firm represented a client in a matter and the lawyer ACTUALLY ACQUIRED confidential information that is material to the matter while working at the former firm, the lawyer must NOT subsequently represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter ADVERSE to the former firm’s client UNLESS the former firm’s client gives:
ABA: informed consent, confirmed in writing
CA: informed written consent
How may imputation of a disqualifying “former firm” conflict be cured?
Where a lawyer’s former-client conflict arises out of the lawyer’s association with a former firm, the imputation will be cured and does NOT disqualify other lawyers at his new firm if:
1. the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from the matter
2. the disqualified lawyer does not share in the fee from the matter
3. the former client is given notice to ensure compliance
4. CA: the disqualified lawyer did not substantially participate in the same or substantially related matter while at the former firm
Conflict Can Also Be Waived
Additionally, the disqualified lawyer’s new firm is not disqualified from representing the new client if the former client waives the conflict by giving:
ABA: informed consent, confirmed in writing
CA: informed written consent
When does a firm have a disqualifying conflict in relation to a departing lawyer’s client?
If a lawyer represented a client in a matter and then left his firm, taking the representation with him, his former firm is NOT prohibited from representing a client adverse to that former client UNLESS:
1. the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the departing lawyer represented the former client; AND
2. at least one remaining lawyer in the firm has confidential information that is MATERIAL to the matter
Conflict Can Also Be Waived
Additionally, the former firm is not disqualified from representing the new client if the former client waives the conflict by giving:
ABA: informed consent, confirmed in writing
CA: informed written consent