Professional Responsibility Flashcards
`
PR Dating Profile (Lawyer-Client Relationship)
It’s a privilege to date me because:
I am competent, diligent, and loyal.
I’m great communicator, I won’t misunderstand you, you can say things in confidence to me.
I’ll safekeep your things, I’ll scope out your boundaries.
I’ll withdraw if things don’t work out.
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Duty of Competence
- Duty of Diligence
- Duty of Loyalty
- Duty to Communicate
- Duty to Avoid Misunderstandings about Fees
- Duty of Confidentiality
- Duty to Safekeep Property
- Scope of Representation
- Withdrawal
Professional Integrity Mnemonic
“It’s fair to hold the public liable for unauthorized reports of ass”
- Duty of Fairness
- Duty to the Public/Profession
- Liability for other lawyers’ misconduct
- Unauthorized Practice of Law
- Reporting Ethical Violations
- Advertisements/Solicitations
Duty of Loyalty
A lawyer has a duty of loyalty to their client to put the interest of their client above all other interests and to avoid any conflicts of interest
Concurrent conflict of interest (generally)
A concurrent conflict of interest exists when:
- (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to
another client or - (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client, a former client, a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer
Exception to concurrent conflicts of interest
A lawyer may still represent the client despite a concurrent conflict if:
- The lawyer reasonably believes that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client without an adverse effect
- The representation is not prohibited by law
- The clients are not directly adverse
- Each client gives informed consent confirmed in writing
CA COI rule: no risk limitation (re: certain relationships)
Even if there is no significant risk that a relationship will cause the lawyer’s representation of the client to be materially limited, a lawyer must still provide written disclosure of the relationship to the client if:
- The lawyer (or another lawyer in lawyer’s firm) has any kind of relationship to a party or witness OR
- The lawyer knows/reasonably should know that another party’s lawyer is related to the lawyer, lives with lawyer, is in an intimate relationship w/ lawyer, or is a client of lawyer (or is a CL of another lawyer in lawyer’s firm)
CoI between two or more clients
CA: Insurance
Lawyers are permitted to represent both insurers and insureds when the insurer has the contractual right to unilaterally select counsel for the insured, resulting in no conflict of interest. This inherent conflict is deemed not so, by statute
CoI between two or more clients
Corporate/organizations client
A lawyer employed by an organization or corporation represents that org/corp and must act in the best interest of the org/corp
(lawyer may also represent the org and its officers - see other card for rule)
CoI between two or more clients
Representation of organization’s individuals
A lawyer may also represent the organization and its officers, directors, employees, shareholders, or other constituents if the requirements for the exception to represent those with concurrent conflicts are met
CoI between two or more clients
Reporting misconduct to a higher authority
If the lawyer knows that an officer, employee, or other person associated w/ org is engaged in (or intends to engage in) action that (CA: lawyer knows or reasonably should know) violates the law and is likely to result in substantial injury to the org, the lawyer shall report the matter up to a higher authority in the org, unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not in the best interest of the org to do so
What can a lawyer do if they report misconduct to org’s highest authority and the highest authority fails to act?
If the highest authority fails to take action and the lawyer reasonably believes the violation will result in substantial injury to the org:
- ABA only: the lawyer may report out and reveal information, even if confidential, if such disclosure is necessary to prevent the injury.
-
CA: the lawyer may not report out and disclose information outside the org if it will violate the duty of confidentiality; rather the lawyer should urge reconsideration of the matter to the higher authorities within the org, resign from representation, or withdraw from representation, subject to the narrow exception below:
- Exception for death/substantial bodily harm: the lawyer may report out if necessary to prevent a criminal act likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm
CoI between two or more clients
What is the rule re: aggregate settlement or guilty pleas when the lawyer represents two or more clients?
A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients or, in a criminal case, an aggregate agreement as to guilt or pleas, unless each client gives informed written consent
What are the CoI rules re: former government employees?
A lawyer who used to be a government employee shall not represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a government employee, UNLESS the governmental agency gives informed written consent.
The same standard applies to lawyers who served as judges, adjudicative officers, law clerks, arbitrators, mediators, or other third-party neutral persons
What is imputed firm disqualification? Can it be waived by the client?
A conflict for one attorney in the firm is imputed to all other attorneys in the firm, resulting in their disqualification, unless:
- The conflict is based on a personal interest of the disqualified lawyer and does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation by the other firm attorneys OR
- the conflict is based on a former client at a prior firm, the conflicted lawyer is timely screened behind an ethical wall from any participation in the matter, and the former client is provided written notice and certifications of compliance with the screening procedures and CA only: the prohibited lawyer did not substantially participate in the same or a substantially related matter
- A client can waive any imputed disqualification with informed written consent
What are the CoI rules re: when a lawyer leaves a firm?
When a lawyer leaves a firm, the firm may thereafter represent a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer unless:
- The matter is substantially the same and
- Any remaining lawyer has confidential information that is material to the matter
What are the CoI rules re: compensation from third parties?
A lawyer shall not accept compensation from third parties to represent a client unless
- The client gives informed consent (CA requires informed written consent)
- There is no interference with the lawyer’s independent professional judgment or with the lawyer-client relationship and
- Information relating to the representation remains confidential
What are the CoI rules when opposing lawyer is lawyer’s relative?
When lawyers are closely related by blood or marriage, they must obtain informed consent before representing clients in the same or substantially related matters
- CA: California follows the rule above but extends it, requiring written disclosures when one lawyer is a client of the other lawyer, two lawyers cohabitate, or two lawyers have a personal intimate relationship.
What is the CoI rule re: lawyer’s personal beliefs?
The lawyer may still represent the client despite any conflict with his personal beliefs, with full disclosure and informed written consent
What is the CoI rule re: sexual relations with clients?
the lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed before the lawyer client relationship commenced (CA: follows same rule but clarifies that the above rule does not apply to sexual relations with the lawyer’s spouse or registered domestic partner
- CA defines sexual relations as including sexual intercourse or the touching of an intimate part of another person for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse
What is the CoI rule re: business transactions with clients?
A business transaction w/ a client:
- must be fair and reasonable to the client
- the terms must be fully disclosed in writing to the client (CA: also requires that the lawyer’s role in the transaction be fully disclosed in writing)
- the client is advised in writing to seek independent counsel (CA: that the client is actually represented by an independent lawyer of the client’s choice) AND
- The client gives informed written consent to the essential terms including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction
What is the CoI rule re: solicitation of gifts?
solicitation of gifts from the client creates a conflict between the client and the lawyers personal interests
- A lawyer shall not solicit any substantial gift from a client or prepare an instrument that gives the lawyer (or a person related to the lawyer) a gift unless the lawyer/person is related to the client.
- California additional exception: a lawyer may accept a gift if the client has been advised by an independent lawyer who has provided a certificate of independent review OR if the gift is fair and there is no undue influence
What is the CoI rule re: proprietary interest?
a lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation unless to
- Acquire a lien to secure the lawyer’s fees or
- Contract with a client for a reasonable contingency fee in a civil case
What is the CoI interest rule re: financial assistance/advances to clients?
Providing financial assistance or advances to the client creates a conflict between the client and the lawyer’s personal interest
-
ABA only: a lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with litigation, with the exception of
- Contingency cases:a lawyer may advancecourt costs and expenses of litigation in contingency cases, the repayment of which is dependent on the case outcome OR
- Indigent clients: a lawyer can advance court costs and expenses of litigation on behalf of indigent clients
- California rule: a lawyer may lend money to the client after employment, for any purpose, if the client promises in writing to repay the loan
What are the CoI rules re: limiting malpractice liability?
- ABA only: a lawyer may not agree to limit their own liability to the client without advising the client unless client is represented by an independent counsel.
- CA: CA rules do not allow a lawyer to prospectively limit liability to a client
What are the CoI rules re: settlement of claims?
- a lawyer shall not settle a claim or potential claim for such liability with an unrepresented client or former client unless that person is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking the advice of independent counsel and then is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice
- CA: a lawyer shall not settle a claim or potential claim for such liability with an unrepresented client or former client unless they are represented by independent counsel)
Duty to Communicate
A lawyer has a duty to reasonably communicate with a client and keep them informed of the status of their case so that the client can make informed decisions.
CA: allows a lawyer to delay communication of information to a client if the lawyer reasonably believes that the client may cause imminent harm to the themselves or others
Scope of Representation
The lawyer must abide by the client’s substantive decisions after the lawyer has consulted with the client (ex: settle, plea, or wave jury trial; expenses, testify, appeal). The lawyer is responsible for employing the appropriate legal strategy (ex: motions, discovery, witness or evidence use, etc.)
ABA: Duty of Confidentiality
ABA: the lawyer shall not reveal info relating to the representation of a client, except the lawyer may in the following situations (“Cats And Dogs Can Cuddle, Sleep and Dream” - Consent, Authorized, Death, Crime, Comply, Secure, Defense):
- The client gives informed consent
- The disclosure is impliedly authorized to represent the client
- The lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm
- To prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud (or to mitigate or rectify a crime or fraud) committed by the client that has resulted/will result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and the client has used the lawyer’s services to do so
- To comply with a court order, ethics rule, or statute
- To secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with ethics rules OR
- To establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client, or in defense of the contact the client was involved in with the lawyer services (ex: defend malpractice, collect fees)
CA: Duty of Confidentiality
a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client without the informed consent of the client, except the lawyer may in the following situations:
- When necessary to prevent a crime that would cause reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. However, the lawyer MUST first:
- Make a good faith effort to persuade the client not to commit the crime
- Inform the client of the lawyer’s ability to reveal the information AND
- Only reveal as much information as necessary to prevent the crime
- When compelled by law or court order
- To establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client, or in defense of the conduct the client was involved in with the lawyer’s services (ex: defend malpractice, collect fees)
[CA rule much stricter, provides fewer grounds permitting revealing confidential info]
Attorney-Client Privilege
Attorney-client privilege allows the client to keep confidential all communications with their attorney.
For the communication to be considered confidential, it (1) must have been intended to be confidential and (2) made for the purpose of facilitating legal services.
The client can refuse to testify and prevent his attorney from testifying.
- Only applies to communications, not physical evidence turned over to lawyer.
-
Confidential communications: the communication must be intended to be confidential
- The presence of a third party may serve to waive the privilege, unless where necessary (ex: translator, paralegal, etc).
- California Evidence Code (CEC) only: allows holder to stop eavesdroppers and other wrongful inceptors from revealing confidential information.
For A-C Privilege, must the communication have been made for the purpose of facilitating legal services?
Yes, though a fee need not be paid