Professional Responsibility Flashcards
What is Rule 1.1?
Competence
- A lawyer shall not intentionally, recklessly, with gross negligence, or repeatedly fail to perform legal services with competence.
- Competence means that the lawyer has the learning and skill and mental, emotional, and physical ability reasonably necessary for performance of the legal service.
What are the options if a lawyer does not have the competence to handle a case?
- Associate another attorney who has competence
- Acquire sufficient learning and skill
- Referring the matter to a lawyer that the lawyer reasonably believes to be competent.
What is Rule 1.3?
Diligence
A lawyer shall not intentionally, repeatedly, recklessly or with gross negligence fail to act with reasonable diligence in representing a client.
What is reasonable diligence?
A lawyer acts with commitment and dedication to the interests of the client and does not neglect or disregard, or unduly delay a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer.
Is a mistake of judgment a lack of competence?
It is not, by itself a failure to act competently.
Competence with Technology
A lawyer must have a working knowledge of the uses of technology in a law practice.
This incudes the benefits as well as risks associated with relevant technology.
Communication with the client
The lawyer must keep the client reasonably informed about significant developments relating to the representation.
Duty to communicate with a client with diminished capacity
The duty to communicate are absolute.
If the lawyer is unable to communicate, the lawyer may consider withdrawing.
Rule 1.2
Scope of Representation
- A lawyer may take action on behalf of hte client htat is authorized.
- A lawyer shall abide by the client’s decision to settle a matter.
Rule 1.2.1
Advising or Assisting the Violation of Law
*A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage or assist a client in conduct that criminal, fraudulent, or a violation of any law.
Scope of Representation - Components of the initial engagement letter
- Specify the client
- The client’s role
- Scope of representation
Representation of a fiduciary
The lawyer should advise the beneficiaries that representation is not extended to them, and they should seek separate counsel.
Can an attorney represent a fiduciary and one or more beneficiaries?
Yes, provided there is informed consent and a detailed disclosure of the actual and potential conflicts that may arise in the course of the representation.
Advising trustee on issues of personal liability
The attorney should advise the fiduciary that the beneficiaries may assert actions, such as breach of trust, self-dealing, failure to deal with beneficiaries impartially, and claims on the fiduciary’s accounting.
Probate Code section 21384
Certificate of Independent Review
*A lawyer-prepared certificate of review validates a transfer to a person described in PCS 21380
PCS 21384 Requirements
The lawyer preparing the COIR cannot have any legal, business, financial, professional relationship with the beneficiary.
A written agreement should be prepared.
Rule 1.7
A lawyer shall not, without informed consent from each client that representation is directly adverse to another client in the same or a separate matter.
Rule 1.7 - additional requirements
The lawyer must:
- Able to provide competent and diligent representation
- The representation is not prohibited by law
- The representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or proceeding.
Rule 1.7(b)
Lawyers may use their own informed judgment in determining whether a potential conflict of interest poses a significant risk of compromising the lawyer’s exercise of independent judgment and loyalty to the client.
Duty of Undivided Loyalty
A lawyer cannot undertake representation directly adverse to that client without that client’s informed written consent.
Representing more than one client
A lawyer can represent more than one client with adverse interests if:
- If the lawyer believes it is appropriate
- The extent to which material information imparted by any client may be share with others
- The possibility that the attorney may have to withdraw
Joint Representation of Spouses - presumption
There is no actual adversity between the spouses and all information shared by the clients is subject to joint representation.
Joint Representation of Spouses - Adverse Interests
A lawyer can represent joint spouses with adverse interests if:
- Obtains informed written consent
a. The lawyer must explain the lawyer’s responsibilities to each spouse and the potential conflict. - The lawyer can provide competent and diligent representation to both spouses
- The engagement letter must state the attorney can withdraw if there is an irreconcilable conflict between spouses.
Engagement Letter and conflict of interests (requirements)
The engagement letter cannot state that there is a potential conflict of interest. It must be informed by stating the following:
- Examples of circumstances where conflicts could surface
- Discuss the material risks (actual or foreseeable) risks of joint representation