Professional Conduct Principles Flashcards
What 3 requirements must lawyers comply with?
Legal, regulatory, ethical
(See principles and CCS)
Do lawyers owe a duty to the public?
Yes
What are the 7 principles of ethical behaviour?
1) ROL/ admin of justice
2) Public trust/ confidence
3) Independence
4) Honesty
5) Integrity
6) EDI
7) Client’s best interests
Do principles apply to your personal life as well as professional?
Yes
If principles conflict, which takes priority?
Those safeguarding wider public interest rather than indv client
CCS: how broad and who checks your compliance?
Covers any conduct which touches realistically upon your practice of the profession. You are personally responsible for your compliance
What does the CCF cover?
CCS standards plus others, inc: internal systems/ controls; managers’ responsibilities, COLP and COFA requirements
COLP
Compliance Officer for Legal Practice
Ensures firm complies/ records failure to comply with t&cs of SRA authorisation and statutory obligations + report any material failure to SRA as soon as practicable
Day to day ensures CCF standards met by firm, staff, managers. Esp CCF 2 (compliance and business systems), CCF 4 (service and competence)
Requirement for clear and effective governance structure and reporting lines (CCF 2.1) underlies standards above
COFA
Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration
Ensures firms comply with SRA Accounts Rules 2019 + reports any serious breaches of them to SRA promptly
No prescribed systems to achieve the above but many firms use risk mgmt policy and financial mgmt policy
CCS: consequences of breach
Serious. Regulatory action by SRA
CCF: consequences of breach
Serious. Regulatory action by SRA against Firm/ managers/ compliance officers AND employees responsible for breach
What are the 7 priority risks for the legal profession?
1) Anti ML
2) Client money (looked after)
3) Diversity (public trust)
4) Cyber security (confidential + sensitive personal info; money)
5) Integrity/ ethics (trust and confidence - clients and public)
6) Meeting legal needs (what clients can afford + funding options; display prices and info about services on website)
7) Standards of service (behaviour and competence)
8 CCS and CCF requirements to address 7 risks to the profession
1) Keep client money safe (CCS 4.2)
2) Not take unfair advantage of clients (CCS 1.2)
3) Ensure solicitors’ instructions reflect client’s wishes (CCS 3.1)
4) Address EDI (CCS 1.1; CCF 1.5)
5) Provide clear complaints procedure (CCS 8.2 - 8.5)
6) Provide clear info to client about service provided and cost (CCS 8.6 + 8.7)
7) Update legal knowledge regularly
8) Ensure work of junior lawyers is properly supervised
Keeping knowledge up to date CCS and CCF
CCS 3.2 (competent and timely service); 3.3 (knowledge and skills); 7.1 (governing law and regs of your work)
CCF 4.3 (prof knowledge and skills + understanding of legal/ ethical/ regulatory requirements)
Supervision of junior lawyers
CCS 3.5 (managers are accountable and supervisory)
CCS 3.6 (ensure indvs are competent and update their knowledge of legal/ ethical/ regulatory obligations)
CCF 4.4 (use effective system for supervising client matters - NOT necessary for person to be legally qualified/ they just need suitable experience/ knowledge/ competence and guidance on how to refer issues outside their authority ‘upwards’)
What are the 3 Cs used whenever you receive new instructions?
1) Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
2) Conflict checks
3) Client care letters
Where does CDD come from and when should it be carried out?
MLR 2017. Reg 27 of it says CDD should be carried out when:
1) Est. business relationship
2) Carrying out occasional transaction
3) Suspect ML or terrorist financing
What is CDD? (Ie. KYC)
1) ID client (name and address)
2) Verify their identity (original docs like passport; conduct it electronically; obtain info from other regulated people like banks)
Each firm has its own policy
Own interest conflict or significant risk of one (CCS/ CCF 6.1) - can you act? Why?
GR = no. No exceptions
Upholds Principles 2 (trust), 3 (independence), 4 (honesty), 5 (integrity), 7 (best interests)
Egs: financial interest of yours or someone close to you (eg DD on company you have shares in), personal or business relationship of yours (eg friend involved in client’s claim), your role as an employee (eg client in dispute involving your employer), your conduct as indv or firm (eg wrong advice)
CCS/ CCF 6.2 - CANNOT act if there is a conflict of interest or significant risk of one, UNLESS (x2 exceptions):
1) Clients have substantially common interest in whole or part of matter (clear common purpose + strong consensus on how to achieve it/ little negotiation left + satisfy para 6.2(i)-(iii) Codes’ conditions)
2) Clients are competing for same objective + satisfy para 6.2(i)-(iii) Codes’ conditions
What are the 3 components constituting the requirement to carry out a conflict check?
1) See if new instructions would conflict with work your firm is doing for another client AND your own interests
2) Nat’l and Int’l firms: would work conflict with work firm is doing for existing client in another office in same country or overseas
3) Do when receiving instruction from new AND existing clients
How to carry out conflict check?
1) Search against client name (inc parent or subsidiary companies)
2) Search against client’s company number (inc parent or subsidiary companies)
3) Search names of counter parties to matter
Extra: company name and number being bought; names of directors of client (inc parent and subsidiaries) and company being bought to check conflict; name of matter
Check firm policy
What is a client care letter (ie. letter of engagement/ retainer letter)?
Not required under CCS/ CCF but sets out terms solicitor will carry out work on to help client understand what law firm does. Sent out at beginning of matter. Achieves CCS 3 (service and competence) and CCS 8 (complaints handling). Ongoing obligation to let client know if info in letter becomes superseded as matter progresses.
Firms have standard forms
Established clients - client care letter requirements altered
Annual letters sent out followed by shorter letters when instructions received on each new matter
5 sections to client care letter
1) Confirmation of your client’s instructions and options (client objectives, options available, agreement on next steps, agreement of level of service/ updates)
2) General info on each parties responsibilities (yours, client’s, anything which may limit your actions (eg conflict), advice to client that you may be entitled to a lien in respect of their files (right to retain possession of them) if there are any unpaid costs)
3) Costs info (charging basis, hourly rate if applicable, intervals when will notify client of fees, VAT/ disbursements/ other fees, agreed limits on fees, fee estimate and when it could be exceeded, payment terms)
4) Explanation of name and status of person dealing with matter and their supervisor
5) Complaints procedure (how to complain, who to complain to, firm’s procedure)
SRA guidance on client care letters
1) Easy to understand. They must be able to make informed decisions about the services they need, how their matter will be handled, options available (CCS 8.6) and regulatory protections available to them (CCS 8.11)
2) Contains right info/ transparent (CCS 8): what is going to happen/ when/ by who at firm (without representing any business not authorised by SRA) (CCS 8.10). Also costs, what client needs to do, contact details, clear purpose, concise, plain English, considered needs of vulnerable clients
3) Timely delivery/ as soon as practicable after receiving instructions on new matter
3 good reasons to terminate client’s retainer
1) When cannot obtain clear instructions
2) When continuing to act would break law or breach Codes
3) Client failed to pay interim bills
(NOT on self-interest grounds)
3 situations when you CANNOT accept instructions
1) Breaching the law or codes, eg fraud; conflict of interest (Principles 1 and 2; CCS)
2) When you cannot provide a competent service, eg not your area of expertise; too busy (CCS 3.2)
3) When you’re not authorised to act in your client’s behalf (if you have reason to believe instructions do not represent wishes of your client, you cannot act) (CCS 3.1)
Principles: there’s a conflict between acting in best interests of each client and acting with independence/ honesty/ integrity, which wins?
Acting with independence/ honesty/ integrity
Acting with integrity vs acting with honesty?
Integrity is broader than honesty, eg misleading client or court only breaches honesty
Integrity is about being scrupulous, careful, and accurate