Prof. Responsibility (Final) Flashcards
Conflict of interest (Current client and 3rd party)
- Conflict on interest if significant risk that
- Representation materially limited by
- L’s responsibility to any 3rd party
ABA exceptions to concurrent conflicts
- L’s reasonable belief
- Not prohibited by law
- Claims not against each other
- Informed written consent
CA exceptions to concurrent conflicts of interest
- Informed written consent
- Only need written disclosure (not consent) if:
- -Conflict between L ad party/witness
- -Same matter as client
- -Substantial effect of L’s representation
Business associations with client
- Terms are fair and reasonable
- Terms fully disclosed in writing to client
- Advised to seek independent counsel
- Informed written consent
Financial assistance (ABA)
- Only for advancing
- Court costs/litigation expenses
- In contingency cases
- Or indigent cases
Financial Assistance (CA)
- After employment
- OK to loan if written IOU
- Compensation by 3rd party OK if:
- -Informed consent
- -No interference with L and client
- -Information remains confidential
Organization
-L acts for best interest of organization
-If L knows associated person engaged in wrongdoing
-Likely to result in substantial injury
-L refers to internal higher authority
- ABA: if need, refer to outside authority
CA: if needed, resign; no outside referral
Fee Considerations
{TENT FLAW} Time limitations Experience, reputation, ability Nature and length of representation Time, labor, novelty, difficulty Fee customarily charged Likelihoods to preclude other employment Amount involved/results obtained Whether fixed or contingent fee
Fee Agreements (CA)
- If > $1,000
- In writing, unless:
- Corporate client
- Client waives writing requirement
- Emergency
- Previous client & similar service
Sex with client (CA)
If not preexisting, OK but no:
- Require/demand representation
- Coerce, intimidate, or use undue influence
- Continue if makes incompetent
Mandatory withdraw
-Violation of the rules
-Mental/physical condition
-ABA: discharged
CA: knows client’s action to harass
Elective Withdraw
- Fraud/crime using L’s services
- Client’s action is regnant to L
- Client fails to fulfill obligation
- Good cause
- ABA: no materially adverse effect on client
- ABA: unreasonable financial burden on L
- CA: client has good faith, unreasonable; can’t work with co-counsel