Problem of Evil Flashcards

1
Q

What is natural evil?

A

Evil caused by the natural world outside of human decision-making, e.g. earthquakes and volcanoes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is moral evil?

A

Evil caused directly by human agency, e.g. murder/genocide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the logical problem of evil?

A

The problem that the existence of evil rules out the existence of the God of Classical Theism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name a scholar associated with the logical problem of evil

A

J.L. Mackie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does Mackie illustrate the logical problem of evil?

A

Using the inconsistent triad: evil exists; God is all-loving; God is all-powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the evidential problem of evil?

A

The problem concerned with excessive and pointless suffering, which makes the existence of God improbable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name a scholar associated with the evidential problem of evil

A

William Rowe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name one of the examples William Rowe gives to illustrate the evidential problem of evil

A

Fawn burning in a forest fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a theodicy?

A

From the Greek theos/dike (God/justice): a defence of God against the problem of evil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the God of Classical Theism?

A

A monotheistic God understood as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent; the figure found across the three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who gave the earliest version of the Free Will Defence?

A

St Augustine of Hippo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the world like when it was created, according to Augustine?

A

It was perfect - as seen in the Book of Genesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the cause of moral evil, according to Augustine?

A

God gave humans free will so they could enter into a loving relationship with him, but they abused it and chose evil instead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the cause of natural evil, according to Augustine?

A

The sins of humans and fallen angels disrupted the harmony of God’s creation and brought natural evil into the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why, according to Augustine, are we all deserving of punishment?

A

We all carry original sin as we were “seminally present in the loins of Adam”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Augustine’s proof that God is all-loving?

A

He would be justified in sending us all to Hell, but instead offers salvation through Christ

17
Q

Give a strength of the free will defence

A

It is faithful to the Biblical God and leaves all his attributes intact; it motivates us to address evil in the world as we recognise our responsibility for causing it

18
Q

Give a weakness of the free will defence

A

It relies on an overly literal interpretation of the Bible that would not be as appealing today; the idea of Original Sin is not backed up by our understanding of genetics/evolution; not everyone accepts free will

19
Q

What does Hick aim to improve upon from Augustine?

A

1) Augustine’s harsh view of the “fallen” human condition
2) The literal approach to the Bible that is incompatible with evolution and other modern beliefs

20
Q

Which classical theologian does Hick draw on in his theodicy?

A

St Irenaeus

21
Q

According to Hick, what was the world like when it was created?

A

Imperfect - humans were spiritually immature in the beginning

22
Q

According to Hick, we grow from the image of God into what?

A

His likeness: Hick is suggesting that we are designed with certain God-like qualities (we are creative, moral, etc.) but we do not FULFIL them straight away

23
Q

What is the ‘epistemic distance’?

A

The ‘knowledge gap’ that God created; we are aware of the possibility of his existence, but far enough away that belief is still a choice

24
Q

What is the purpose of the ‘epistemic distance’ in soul-making theodicy?

A

It shows that God does not coerce us, and plays the role of a loving father who gives us the time to chose to enter into a relationship with him

25
Q

According to Hick, what happens if soul-making is unsuccessful in life?

A

It continues after death (link to Replica Theory - see Self Death & Afterlife topic)

26
Q

What is universal salvation?

A

Hick’s belief that everyone will eventually get to reach Heaven

27
Q

Give a strength of soul-making theodicy

A

The idea that we show our greatest qualities in our response to evil and suffering is often seen in the world - we feel more proud when we have achieved something against all the odds; universal salvation is a more appealing idea than Augustine’s “two cities” of the saved and the damned, because it promises a final end to evil and suffering

28
Q

Give a weakness of soul-making theodicy

A

If Hick’s analogy is taken to its logical extreme, God would be an abusive parent for allowing us to face such pointless suffering which does not improve our souls (evidential problem); universal salvation removes the incentive to be moral & means even Hitler etc. will avoid the punishment of Hell

29
Q

How is Christian scripture used to support the idea of process theology?

A

Genesis - when the Earth was created it was “formless and void” - suggests that there was pre-existing material that God created the Earth from

30
Q

Who came up with process theology?

A

David Griffin (developing the ideas of Whitehead and Hartshorne)

31
Q

What is the name of Griffin’s process theology book?

A

Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition

32
Q

What does Griffin say about the nature of God?

A

He is omnibenevolent, but there are limitations to his omnipotence and omniscience (he cannot be certain about the future and cannot fully control the outcome of creation)

33
Q

How does Griffin support God’s omnibenevolence?

A

1) if God is to be in a loving relationship with us he must be movable (able to experience compassion), unlike the “immovable mover” of traditional theology
2) God takes in our experiences, positive and negative, and suffers alongside us
3) He “lures” rather than “coerces us”; he is persuasive, not abusive

34
Q

Why is Griffin a “panentheist”?

A

He believes that God exists within the universe and beyond it; he is part of the materiality of the world

35
Q

What does Griffin mean by describing God as “open to the future”?

A

He creates the future alongside us and responds to our choices as we make them (the process theologian Robert Mesle compares this to improvisational jazz)

36
Q

How does process theology explain/justify natural and moral evil?

A

God has only good intentions for the universe but cannot control the matter within it; sometimes it rebels which causes evil; but although God took a risk with creation, we should trust that it was a sensible decision and that it would have been worse for him not to create the universe

37
Q

According to Griffin, what happens when creation becomes more complex and developed?

A

We become able to feel both good and evil more deeply - greater heroism and greater evil will come to exist

38
Q

Give a strength of process theology

A

As a 20th Century theodicy it is a more practical response to the horrors of Auschwitz and Hiroshima - it acknowledges that the future may be bad and does not try to frame all suffering as good; by focusing on God’s omnibenevolence rather than his omnipotence, it keeps his most important quality intact

39
Q

Give a weakness of process theology

A

It is vague on the issue of life after death, suggesting that we are simply remembered in the mind of God - so is not a properly religious belief; a God who is not omnipotent is hardly worth believing in