problem 5 - job satisfaction Flashcards
what is the hawthorne effect?
the modification of behavior in response to the knowledge that one is being observed or singled out for special treatment
what is the global approach to satisfaction?
JS is one’s general feeling towards the job – org success should lead to increased general satisfaction
what is the facet approach to satisfaction?
emphasis on different facets of the job – provides a more complete view of job satisfaction
- E.g. someone may get along well with their colleagues but still believe salary is too low
what is the job descriptive index (JDI)?
JS scale that assesses 5 facets:
- Work, pay, promotion opportunities, supervision & coworkers
- Found to be very valid but only has 5 sub scales = might not cover all facets
what is the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire (MSQ)?
a JS scale that comes in a long (100 items) & short (20 items) version
– short form measures overall S: extrinsic (pay, benefits, etc.) + intrinsic (nature of work) satisfaction
- long form measures facets
what are the situational/environmental antecedents of job satisfaction?
(influential) job characteristics (theory): skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy & feedback
- These factors make up the scope (complexity) of a job – a high scope leads to JS, depending on GNS
pay: is associated to an extent with global S but more strongly related to facet of pay S
- Equity is a more imp determinant of pay S
- When 2 ppl do the same work, the person who is paid more is also more satisfied
- higher correlation between distributive justice & salary S than between procedural justice & salary S
what are personal antecedents of job satisfaction?
personality: some people are predetermined/susceptible to liking or disliking their jobs (chronic kickers)
- There is little knowledge about the exact traits that influence JS besides negative affectivity & locus of control
gender: no difference
age: older worker are more satisfied w their jobs
- JS decreases around 26-31 then steadily increase again – dip could indicate tediousness – when someone gets a new job, it often goes up
culture/ethnicity: POC are usually less satisfied
what is negative affectivity?
the tendency of an individual to exp neg emotions (e.g., anxiety & depression)
– when someone has a high NA score they often have low JS
what are ‘chronic kickers’?
people who continually complain about their job
what is locus of control?
People’s beliefs about their ability to control reinforcements in their env
- Internals = ppl who believe they can control reinforcements – have higher level of job motivation & S than externals (don’t believe)
what is the person-job fit?
suggests that JS occurs when there is a good match between a person & a job
– often measured by asking what ppl want in their careers & what they actually have/receive
- The smaller the discrepancy between these indicators, the larger the JS
- One moderator is GNS – low GNS will have constant S regardless of job scope, but high GNS depends on job scope
what is a moderator variable?
determines the strength of 2 correlated variables
- E.g., different people react differently to different job characteristics
what are the 7 models of the JS/JP relationship?
- JS causes JP - very little evidence
- JP causes JS - slightly more evidence
- JS & JP are reciprocally related
- relationship between JS & JP is spurious
- spurious = when the relationship between 2 variables is due to the relation of these variables to a 3rd, unmeasured variable - relationship between JS & JP is moderated by other variables
- there is no relationship
- alternative conceptualization of JS and/or JP
- in response to apparently low S-P relationship: some researchers recast the hypothesis in terms of the relationship between emotions and performance
what is the relationship between ability & task performance
The more mentally demanding the job, the stronger the relation between cog ability & JP
- Employees whose abilities matched their jobs are more satisfied
- Supports idea that JP might lead to JS
what is the relationship between the big 5 & task performance
studies have found relations between each of the 5 dimensions & task P, w conscientiousness being the best predictor