Privity of Contract Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

AoP governing Privity of Contract

A

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 1(1) C(RoTP)A’99

A

gives a 3rd p the right to enforce the contract where it is intended that a benefit should be conferred to them in 2 situations: express/implied (DvM, NvC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 1(2) of C(RoTP)A’‘99

A

the 2nd (implied) right will not apply if the parties did not intend the 3rd p to have it (PvA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Section 3 C(RoTP)’99

A

allows a contracting p to have a defence against the 3rd p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dunlop v Selfridge, Beswick v Beswick

A

the rule of PoC-> a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to the contract, this comes from the need to give consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dolphin v Maritime, Nishin v Cleaves

A

s1(1) 2 situations:

  • s1(1)(a), expressly stated in the c
  • s1(1)(b) implied from the c, if the c ‘purports to confer a benefit on the 3rd p’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Prudential v Ayers

A

s1(2) the 2nd (implied) right will not apply if the parties did not intend the 3rd p to have it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Shanklin Pier v Detel

A

1 CL: collateral c, formed in addition to main c. if a main contracting party insists on the collateral c, they will have rights over a party in the sub-contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tulk v Moxhay

A

2 CL: restrictive covenant, e.g to build on land, placed by a seller of land, which ‘runs with the land’ and binds subsequent purchasers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3rd Case Law

A

an agency agreement, where agent makes a contract with another p on behalf if his client, client can enforce their rights that contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Jackson v Horizon Holidays

A

4 CL: where a c is made by one person on behalf of the whole family, as in * each member can enforce their rights under that contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Darlington v Wiltshier

A

5 CL: property developers able to recover losses from builders on behalf of future owners of p. however, c’s between builders & subcontract p’s (e.g) cannot be enforced by PD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Privity Checklist

A
  • define
  • C(RTP)A ‘99
  • s1(1) intend-express/implied (DvM, NvC) s1(2) x intend (PvA), s3 defence against
  • collateral (SPvD, covenant (TvM), agency, family (JvHH) & property developers (DvW)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
-C(RTP)A ‘99

A

AoP governing Privity of Contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

gives a 3rd p the right to enforce the contract where it is intended that a benefit should be conferred to them in 2 situations: express/implied (DvM, NvC)

A

Section 1(1) of C(RTP) ‘99

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the 2nd (implied) right will not apply if the parties did not intend the 3rd p to have it (PvA)

A

Section 1(2) of C(RTP) ‘99

17
Q

allows a contracting p to have a defence against the 3rd p just as if the 3rd p was a contracting p

A

Section 3 of C(RTP) ‘99

18
Q

the rule of PoC-> a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to the contract, this comes from the need to give consideration

A

Dunlop v Selfridge, Beswick v Beswick

19
Q

s1(1) 2 situations:

  • expressly stated in the c
  • interpreted/implied from the c, if the c ‘purports to confer a benefit on the 3rd p’
A

Dolphin v Maritime, Nishin v Cleaves

20
Q

s1(2) the 2nd (implied) right will not apply if the parties did not intend the 3rd p to have it

A

Prudential v Ayers

21
Q

1 CL: collateral c, formed in addition to main c. if a main contracting party insists on the collateral c, they will have rights over a party in the sub-contract

A

Shanklin Pier v Detel

22
Q

2 CL: restrictive covenant, e.g to build on land, placed by a seller of land, which ‘runs with the land’ and binds subsequent purchasers

A

Tulk v Moxhay

23
Q

an agency agreement, where agent makes a contract with another p on behalf if his client, client can enforce their rights that contract

A

3rd Case Law

24
Q

4 CL: where a c is made by one person on behalf of the whole family, as in * each member can enforce their rights under that contract

A

Jackson v Horizon Holidays

25
Q

5 CL: property developers able to recover losses from builders on behalf of future owners of p. however, c’s between builders & subcontract p’s (e.g) cannot be enforced by PD

A

Darlington v Wiltshier

26
Q

section 1(1)(a) of C(RoTP)A’99

A

s1(1)-> right to enforce if expressly stated in contract

27
Q

section 1(1)(b) of C(RoTP)A’99

A

s1(1) right to enforce when implied from c, if the c (purports to confer a benefit) DvM, NvC