Performance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Cutter v Powell

A

performance can discharge (end) a contract, the strict rule is that performance must be complete and exact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ritchie v Atkinson

A

1) for a divisible (severable) contract: where the c has separate obligations, non-completion of one part is not a breach of the whole c
- entitled to payment for work done, unless non-comp removes all benefit from the c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dakin v Lee

A

2) if a p has carried out a substantial part of what was req in c
- entitled to payment for that part, unless the part perf removes all benefit
- ‘substantial’ is considered on a case to case basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sumpter v Hedges

A

3) if a p accepts part perf of a c, through a specific acknowledgement
- the other p is entitled to payment of what he has perf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Planche v Colburn

A

4) if a p prevents the other from carrying out performance, the innocent party is entitled to payment for any wasted work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Union Eagle v Golden Achievement

A

5) if a time/date is specified within c, will be a condition of the c. failure to meet that deadline will result in breach of c
- where no time/date is spec, it must be completed within a r time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Checklist

A
  • strict rule (CvP)
  • divisible (RvA)
  • substantial part (DvL)
  • accepts part (SvH)
  • p prevents (PvC)
  • time/date (UEvGA)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

performance can discharge (end) a contract, the strict rule is that performance must be complete and exact

A

Cutter v Powell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1) for a divisible (severable) contract: where the c has separate obligations, non-completion of one part is not a breach of the whole c
- entitled to payment for work done, unless non-comp removes all benefit

A

Ritchie v Atkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2) if a p has carried out a substantial part of what was req in c
- entitled to payment for that part, unless the part perf removes all benefit
- ‘substantial’ is considered on a case to case basis

A

Dakin v Lee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3) if a p accepts part perf of a c, through a specific acknowledgement
- the other p is entitled to payment of what he has perf

A

Sumpter v Hedges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4) if a p prevents the other from carrying out performance, the innocent party is entitled to payment for any wasted work

A

Planche v Colburn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

5) if a time/date is specified within c, will be a condition of the c. failure to meet that deadline will result in breach of c
- where no time/date is spec, it must be completed within a r time

A

Union Eagle v Golden Achievement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly