Private Nuisance 2B Flashcards

1
Q

How is Private Nuisance defined?

A

An Indirect, substantial and unlawful interference with a person’s ordinary use or enjoyment of land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the first element of nuisance?

A

C is able to sue D (both parties are eligible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case is used for deciding if C is eligible to sue for the first element?

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What legal principle came from Hunter v Canary Wharf?

A

To be able to sue in nuisance, C must have a proprietary interest/ legal rights in the land being affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case is used for deciding if D is eligible to be sued for the first element?

A

Tetley v Chitty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What legal principle came from Tetley v Chitty?

A

If the owner of the land is aware of the nuisance and has approved this then they are liable for the disruption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the second element of Private nuisance?

A

Indirect interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What two types to damage come under indirect interference?

A

non-physical and physical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case is used as an example for a physical damage?

A

Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case is used as an example for a non physical discomfort, particularly noise?

A

Christie v Davey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case is used as an example for a non physical discomfort, particularly smell?

A

Wheeler v Saunders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by continuing interference?

A

A natural hazard develops and D fails to take precautions to stop it interfering with other land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case is used for continuing interference?

A

Leakey v National Trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What legal principle came from Leakey v National Trust?

A

Despite not causing the accident, the failure to do anything about it was enough for interference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the third element of Private Nuisance?

A

Is D affecting C’s common and ordinary use?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does ‘Sensitivity of C’s use’ mean?

A

It looks at whether C has only suffered due to some ‘abnormal sensitivity’ of their land/ use of it, or if the interference would have affected other people on that land the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What case is used for sensitivity of c’s use?

A

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the outcome of NRI v Morris?

A

The business was abnormally sensitive therefore it was not affecting C’s common and ordinary use of the land and D is not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the law surrounding Recreational activities or ‘things of delight’?

A

C cannot sue if the thing being affected is merely a fun thing to do on the land rather than the fundamental use of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What case is used for ‘things of delight’?

A

AG v Doughty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What legal principle came from AG v Doughty?

A

Blocking a view is not interfering with the use or enjoyment of land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the second case used for ‘things of delight’?

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf

23
Q

What legal principle came from Hunter v Canary Wharf that relates to ‘things of delight’?

A

Watching TV is not using or enjoying LAND, it is a recreational activity.

24
Q

What is the fourth element of Private Nuisance?

A

Substantial Interference

25
Q

What case is used for substantial interference?

A

Halsey v Esso Petroleum

26
Q

What were the two indirect interferences in Halsey v Esso Petroleum?

A

Non-physical - loud noise and the smell
Physical - Damage to paintwork.

27
Q

What is the rule about when physical damage is substantial?

A

Anything that causes physical damage is a substantial interference.

28
Q

What is the rule about non-physical damage being substantial?

A

Non-physical damage must make it physically unpleasant to be on the land to be substantial.

29
Q

What is the fifth element of Private Nuisance?

A

Unlawful Interference (is D’s use common and ordinary?)

30
Q

What case is used for unlawful interference?

A

Fearn v Tate Gallery

31
Q

What legal principle came from Fearn v Tate Gallery?

A

There must be give and take between neighbours. Unless D’s use goes beyond what is common and ordinary.

32
Q

What is the first factor we use to decide if D’s use was common and ordinary?

A

Locality meaning - considering what is common and ordinary based on the area.

33
Q

What case is used for locality in the 5th element?

A

Sturges v Bridgman

34
Q

Why was D’s use of the land in Sturges v Bridgman not common and ordinary for the area?

A

It was a factory in a predominantly quiet doctor’s surgery area.

35
Q

What is the second factor used to decide if D’s use was common and ordinary?

A

Duration - Considering when the interference happens and how long it lasts.

36
Q

What case is used for Duration in the 5th element?

A

Halsey v Esso Petroleum.

37
Q

Why would the duration of noise in Halsey v Esso Petroleum not be common or ordinary?

A

As it was overnight. It may be expected during the day but not in the middle of the night.

38
Q

What is the second case used for duration in the 5th element?

A

Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks

39
Q

What was the legal principle in CRC v Kimbolton Fireworks?

A

Even a temporary interference can go beyond the common and ordinary use of the land but only if the interference is severe.

40
Q

What is the third factor used to decide if D’s use was common and ordinary?

A

Malice - Does D have bad intentions?

41
Q

What case is used for Malice in the 5th element of Private nuisance?

A

Christie v Davey

42
Q

What was the legal principle from Christie v Davey in relation to Malice (in the 5th element)?

A

If D was trying to be a nuisance and had bad intentions then it cannot be considered as a common and ordinary use of the land.

43
Q

What are the two defences that can be used for Private Nuisance?

A
  1. Prescription
  2. Planning Permission
44
Q

What can apply instead if prescription fails?

A

Volenti non fit injuria (consent)

45
Q

What is meant by Prescription?

A

Where D has carried out the nuisance on C for 20 consecutive years, D is prescribed the right to continue that activity.

46
Q

What case is used for Prescription?

A

Sturges v Bridgman

47
Q

What legal principle came from Sturges v Bridgman in relation to Prescription?

A

D can only be prescribed the right if his act has been a clear nuisance for all twenty years.

48
Q

What does planning permission do?

A

Grants D a chance to show his use has become common and ordinary for the area.

49
Q

What case is used for Planning Permission?

A

Wheeler v Saunders

50
Q

What did the court say about planning permission in Wheeler v Saunders?

A

Planning permission itself does not change the locality, it just gives permission for D to try to change the locality. If he is unsuccessful and his use is still considered uncommon for that area, then D’s actions are still considered a nuisance.

51
Q

What are the 3 remedies for Private Nuisance?

A

Injunction
Damages
Abatement

52
Q

What is meant by an injunction?

A

Can make D stop doing something or can make D do something

Can be : perpetual (stop activity completely
Or
Partial (limits what D can do)

53
Q

What can damages be used for?

A

Cover the cost of physical damage or to compensate non-physical situations if an injunction would not work.

54
Q

What is meant by an Abatement?

A

This means letting C do something to prevent the nuisance.