Private Nuisance Flashcards
What are the 3 things that have to be proven in order to sue for private nuisance?
1) Interference with the use or enjoyment of land
2) Damage to the claimant that was foreseeable
3) The interference is unlawful
Private Nuisance definition
‘An unlawful (unreasonable) interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land coming
from neighbouring land’
Interference case for Noise and Vibrations?
Sturges v Bridgeman
Interference case Sturges v Bridgeman is an example of what?
Noise and Vibrations
Interference case St Helens Smelting v Tipping is an example for what?
Smoke and Fumes
Interference case for smoke and fumes?
St Helens Smelting v Tipping
Interference case Bliss v Hall is an example of what?
Smells
Interference case for smells?
Bliss v Hall
Interference case Halsey v Esso Petroleum is an example of what?
Smells and physical damage
Interference case for Smells and physical damage?
Halsey v Esso Petroleum
Interference case Hunter v Canary Wharf is an example of what?
Blocking Tv Reception
Interference case for Blocking Tv Reception?
Hunter v Canary Wharf
For damage what must the claimant prove?
causation and that the damage was reasonably foreseeable
What principles will the judge consider for unreasonableness?
‘give and take’, AKA the ‘let and live’ principle
What is the main factor for unreasonableness?
Sensitivity - A defendant is not responsible for damage that occurs solely due to the claimant being abnormally sensitive
What are the two cases for unreasonableness?
Robinson v Klivert & Mckinnon Industries v Walker
What happened in Robinson v Klivert?
Here delicate brown paper dried out, failed claim as overly sensitive
What’s the contrast to Robinson v Klivert?
If the claimant can show that their right to enjoyment has been infringed then you can still claim for damage, even if overly sensitive
What happened in Mckinnon Industries v Walker?
Here the claimants sensitive orchids were damaged by fumes and gas - held liable as their right to normal enjoyment had been infringed
Here delicate brown paper dried out, failed claim as overly sensitive - What case is this?
Robinson v Klivert
Here the claimants sensitive orchids were damaged by fumes and gas - held liable as their right to normal enjoyment had been infringed - What case is this?
Mckinnon Industries v Walker
explain the concept of location in private nuisance
A noise in a street full of night clubs is unlikely to be a nuisance, whereas a noise in a rural setting could be
What happened in Sturges v Bridgeman?
here a judge stated a nuisance in Belgrave square (Nice Houses) would not be considered a nuisance, whereas a nuisance in Bermondsey (Area of Industry) would not be a nuisance. A doctor sued a confectioner who made a lot of noise and succeeded