Assault Flashcards
What Act and Section number is Assault defined under?
S.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Whats the maximum fine and sentence for Assault?
£5000 and or 12 Months
What is the Actus Reus for Assault?
When the defendant does any act which causes the victim to fear unlawful force
Definition for Assault?
To intentionally or recklessly cause the apprehension of immediate force
Case and POL for R v Lamb
Case - two friends playing with a gun which they didn’t know was dangerous and one was killed accidentally
POL - No assault as victim was not fearful of the gun
Case and POL for R v Misalati
Case - Defendant racially abused staff and evidence showed staff feared violence
POL - If a threat is made as a joke, then the offence will not be committed as the defendant lacks mens rea
Case and POL for Chambers v DPP
Case - Defendant joked in airport about blowing up the airport to his friends
POL - Appeal was allowed on the basis of none of his recipients feared his message
Case and POL for R v Ireland and R v Constanza
Case - both cases victim was stalked, in Ireland repeated silent phone calls were received and in Constanza unsolicited letters
POL - Words and silence can constitute and assault
Case and POL for Tubervile v Savage
Case - Defendant put his hand on his sword which is enough to constitute as an assault but his words made it clear he was intending to use violence
POL - Words can cancel an assault
However the victim may fear the possibility of immediate force
Case and POL for Smith v Chief Superintendent , Woking Police Station
Case - Victim standing in night dress saw man in garden looking at her
POL - A matter of causation the defendants actions must be the cause of the fear
What is the Mens Rea for Assault?
The mens rea for assault is intention or Cunningham recklessness
Case and POL for R v Cunningham
Case - Robbed gas meter, gas spilled out and endangered mother in law
POL - The defendant must appreciate that there is a risk and still goes ahead and takes the risk
Explain the Subjective Test
The accused must actually have had the required foresight
POL for R v G
Confirmed the point made in Cunningham - felt subjective recklessness was the fairest way to assess it