privacy

Question 1

Lenah Meats

Answer 1

development of tort in aus

Question 2

campbell

Answer 2

breach of confidence expanded to privacy in UK

Question 3

Tucker intro

Answer 3

“I see the NZ CL developing a tort of privacy”

Question 4

P v D

Answer 4

privacy claim upheld - injunction issued

Question 5

Hosking

Answer 5

majority of CA created tort for protection of ‘dignity and personal autonomy’

Question 6

Driver

Answer 6

Private facts defined in Lenah

Question 7

Hosking

Answer 7

lower expectation for celebrity

Question 8

Peck

Answer 8

higher expectation for relevant vulnerabilities

Question 9

Campbell

Answer 9

public place must be exceptional circumstances

Question 10

Mosley

Answer 10

some acts are inherently private

Question 11

tucker

Answer 11

info can go from public to private over time

Question 12

Henderson

Answer 12

reasonable person in shoes of plaintiff - widespread publicity not needed would cause arbitrary line drawing

Question 13

Rogers

Answer 13

Elias CJ would support lower threshold from highly offensive

Question 14

TV3

Answer 14

concern rather than interest

Question 15

Campbell

Answer 15

i) whether publication had legitimate aim ii) benefits are proportionate to harm caused

Question 16

Holland

Answer 16

A) an intentional and unauthorised intrusion b) into seclusion c) involving infringement of a reasonable expectation of privacy d) highly offensive to a reasonable person