defective property Flashcards
D v S
Contractors liable for physical damage caused by faulty construction
Stevenson
Analogous - can principles extend top allow recovery for decreased value of property and cost of repair
Dutton
duty owed for defective foundation
Anns
P could claim damages for the cost of returning to safe building
Bowen
Builder liable for causing a hidden defect that posed risk to occupants
Junior Books
Don’t need damage to health to make claim
D & F
criticized JRB said would cut contract
Murphy
overruled JNR B in HOL, didn’t want to impose a duty that should be left to legislature
Mt Albert
allowed a claim for financial loss where it arose out of physical damage
Stieller
extended Bowen duty to allow for all physical loss regardless of damage
Hamlin
didn’t follow murphy - upheld builder duty and council liability
Sunset terraces
affirmed Hamlin didn’t need to change law because of Building Act 2004
Winnipeg and Bryan
SCC AND HCA rejected murphy
Hamlin principle
NZ small scale owner occupied houses relied on council
BA 1991 - all buildings made in accordance - gives power to local authorities - proximity
Sunset principles
duty extend to all homes - distinction based on size and value is arbitrary
Woolcock
held only applies to residential buildings - Kirby J dissented - public interest maintaining builds
Rolls Royce
parties with bargaining power should expect risk allocation can be relied on
Spencer on Byron
No distinction drawn between residential and commercial - vulnerability argument irrelevant and unfair
Sparham
cause for action accrues when defect is found or reasonably found
Pirelli
held it’s when defect is created
Sunset - limitations
Discussed new cause would accrue every new purchase
CHH
arguable a manufacturer owes duty to their defective chattel in building
hughes
manufacturer should be held responsible for products carrying risk of health and occupants