Priority Setting And Resource Allocation Flashcards
Learning Objectives
To understand towards
- Towards Universal Health Coverage
- Mechanisms for public funding of care
- Prioritisation and resource allocation
- Changing expectations of health systems
- The search for greater efficiency
- Factors affecting access to health care
Define Universal Health Coverage
- Ensure that people have equal access to quality health services and financial protection:
- Coverage with health services (prevention, promotion,
treatment and rehabilitation); - Coverage with financial risk protection.
What are the available mechanisms for the public funding of care?
- “Single payer” tax-based general revenues-provide care directly through state-owned and run facilities e.g. the UK, Canada
- Possibility of earmarked (hypothecated) health tax
- Social insurance financing e.g. Germany, France,
- Individually based insurance e.g. United States (refined by the Affordable Care Act)
- Support health care consumers directly through “vouchers”
- Health savings accounts plus catastrophic insurance
Define priority setting in health
The task of determining the priority to be assigned to a service, a service development or an individual patient at a given point in time
Why do we need to set priorities?
- To optimize the allocation of resources to best meet the health care needs of a population
- Lack of priorities can distort a national health system’s ability to progress towards UHC.
- Needs and demands on healthcare resources are greater than the resources available, making some form of rationing inevitable
- Because no or ad-hoc priority-setting approaches can disproportionately impact the least well-off
- To increase efficiency and equity of health funding.
Why is resource allocation important?
- Resources allocated to meet the health needs of the population
- Normative approaches based on societies’ goals and values
- Outcome based approaches
- Community approaches based on stakeholder engagement
What is the criteria for resource allocation?
- Effectiveness and efficiency
- Cost effectiveness-may include monetary costs, effectiveness and efficiency, patient safety and quality of life measures
- Equity-with focus on UHC and reduction of health inequalities and inequities
- Quality of care-difficulties in agreeing definitions and devising measurements
What are the explicit priority settings?
- Era of clinical autonomy and decision making ended in 1990s
- Different country approaches
- E.g. include solidarity, liberalism and pluralism-France
- E.g. independent advisory commissions-Norway, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark
- UK-criteria include necessity, effectiveness, efficiency, personal responsibility, human dignity, human need, equity, comprehensiveness, accountability
- E.g. Oregon health insurance experiment-bundled Medicaid “Health Plan” with bundled elements decided by public consultation. Led to controversy and in 2003 the establishment of expert commission
- E.g. citizens forums- Netherlands
What are the changing expectations of health systems-pressures for reform
- Demography-the increasing proportion of the old and the very old
- Co-morbidities amongst the old
- Technological advances-diagnostic, therapeutic, pharmaceutical
- Raising population expectations for quality care
- Litigation pressures
- The increasing involvement of public institutions and financing
- Pressures for quality, efficiency and cost-control
What does the search for greater efficiency demand side measures consist of?
- Increased insurance payments
- Increased out of pocket payments
- Increased deductibles and co-payments
- Cost sharing with patients
- Excess charges e.g. hospital day charges
- Such measures may delay diagnosis and treatment, paradoxically leading to increased costs later
What does the search for greater efficiency supply side measures consist of?
- Better information about quality care
- Greater transaction visibility, including care outcome measurements
- Better coordination of hospitals and physicians
- Better and more “person-centered” integrated care
- More extensive and binding budgeting
- Greater price competition amongst providers
- Centralised budgeting and cost control, and cash limited budgets
- Changing the pattern of care e.g. increasing health promotion and disease prevention, extending primary health care, increasing day surgery,
Conclusions
- Priority setting is a complex, political and “messy” process
- Goal is that intentions meet the reality of advancing towards UHC
- Various tools for priority setting.
- Priority setting often translates into definition of a benefit package.
- The benefit package should be constructed based in the local context, with explicit prioritization criteria and accountability
- Number of available mechanisms for public funding of care, necessary to achieve UHC
- The poor avoid care they cannot afford