Principles of CDC and Outbreak Management Flashcards
Full steps for outbreak recognition & management
- verify and validate source
- Laboratory definition
- Initial information: who are they, work, family, location, symptoms
- gather info to create risk assessment and decide whether high risk or low risk - consider:
a) severity
b) number of cases
c) how infectious/how fast spread
d) is it happening in a risk setting e.g. school, - Risk assessment should decide whether need to Get a control team together (lab, surveillance, communications, school representative, infection control, local authority, minute taker)
- Devise a case definition and search for further cases
- Act, notify proper authority, institute disease prevention and control measures
- Monitor outbreak
- Establish a working case hypothesis (possible causes of outbreak)
- further information gathering and data analysis to test case hypothesis
- debriefing, feedback, report writing at end of outbreak.
All needs to happen within 24-48 hours.
What is forward contact tracing
Focus on who the case has been in contact with that they may have passed it to – doesn’t identify the source
Forward and Backward Contact Tracing
To try to identify the source & many more cases
Much more effectively identifies chains of transmission
Why don’t always do forward and backward contact tracing?
Don’t have time and resources
Public Health Countermeasures to Outbreaks
Hygiene
Social/physical distancing
Isolation
PPE
Treatment as prevention (to prevent transmission)
Chemoprophylaxis - about preventing transmission - you don’t know if the person you are treating has the infection
Vaccination
4 overall steps in outbreak management
- Identify the problem - find out you have a problem
- Understand the problem - characterise and describe
- Assess risk
- Respond to threat - put measures in place to control outbreak and prevent more cases
Formal (passive) Surveillance pros and cons
Pros:
- provides baseline
- useful for time-trend analysis
- lab reports are accurate and timely
Cons:
- limited range of diseases
- often delayed
- frequently absent
- may only show tip of the iceberg
Examples of formal sources of surveillance
surveillance data
reports from labs
disease notifications from HCPs
Examples of informal sources of surveillance
key informants in affected community e.g. head teacher at affected school
Enhanced Surveillance pros and cons
Pros:
- much more accurate picture
- good clinical data –> good epidemiology
Cons:
- labour intensive
- not useful for bigger picture
- needs commitment
What information is needed to understand the problem
(Clinical, microbiology, epidemiology)
Clinical:
- what is the presentation suggestive of
- is this a clinical or microbiological diagnosis
- how severe is it
Microbiology:
- do we have an organism
Epidemiology:
- do we have an outbreak?
- how many cases
- are they associated
- is there evidence of a point source
- is there evidence of person to person spread
When to do a cohort vs case control study (in epidemiology)
If have a full cohort - do cohort; if you don’t know the whole cohort, do a case control
What to look at in a risk assessment
Certainty - are you sure of cause and source
Spread - how many are infected, how wide is spread
Severity - how severe are the outcomes? How bad can it get
Sensitivity to PH Measures - how easy is it to control?
“Anxiety” - how much public, political and media concern is there
Who should be in an incident management team? (IMT aka OCT (outbreak control team)
Depends on incident
- health protection specialists
- infectious disease physicians
- microbiologist
- environmental health officers
- laboratory staff e.g. food scientists
- health authority/commissioners
- regional and national experts as required
- who is involved in similar work e.g. WHO, UNICEF, NGOs etc
How to do case finding?
- active surveillance
- alert local clinicians and other relevant stakeholders e.g. environmental health
- encourage sampling to identify cases
- alert regional contacts
- alert national and international contacts as required