Primer on evidence-based medicine Flashcards

1
Q

Examination of the evidence from clinical research to justify the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patient

A

definition of evidence-based medicine (EBM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the new school of thought on EBM?

A

Observations can be biased

- need a systematic scientific approach to analyze the observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Randomized controlled trial
Cohort studies
Case-control studies
Case series/ case reports
Animal research/ laboratory studies/ cadaveric studies
A

Levels of evidence (best is on top)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1) Ask - frame the research question (PICOT)
2) Acquire the evidence
3) Appraise and apply the evidence

A

Steps to analyze literature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PICOT

A

a way to craft your question in a way that is focused and clinically answerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

P in PICOT

A

P - patient

- who or what are you studying?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

I in PICOT

A

I - intervention

- what is the treatment or therapy?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

C in PICOT

A

C - comparison

- what are you measuring?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

O in PICOT

A

O - outcomes

- what do you want to measure or prove?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

T in PICOT

A

T - type of study

- do you want to study about therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, etc?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Best kind of research to use

A
  • Always try to find a meta-analysis, systematic review, or randomized controlled trial
  • studies that have a treatment and untreated (control) group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Things to consider when looking for literature

A
Is the study randomized?
Was the follow-up complete?
Were both groups treated equally?
How many people were involved in the study (>100 is optimal, less can be okay)?
How many patient loss was there?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intention to treat

A

How many patients do I need to treat before I see a benefit?

ex. need to treat 11 patients before one gets better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

these studies are more common in surgical specilties

A

prognostic or case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

refers to the possible outcomes of a disease and the frequency with which they can be expected to occur

A

prognosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • can predict any outcome, whether good or bad

- do not necessarily cause the outcomes, just be associated with them long enough to predict their development

A

prognostic factors

17
Q

patient characteristics associated with development of a disease or condition (ie older women are at increased risk for breast cancer)

A

risk factors

18
Q

patient characteristics that help predict whether the patient already with a disease or condition will recover or relapse

A

prognostic factors (note that it is different than risk factors)

19
Q

risk for bias, limits its strength as an investigative tool and that is why it’s a level 3 study

A

retrospective data (memory or charts)

20
Q

2 or more supporting RCT’s in humans, meta-analysis of RCT’s, or Cochrane Systematic Review of RCT’s

A

level A (1) - best

21
Q

1 or more supporting controlled trials in humans or 2 or more trials in an animal model

A

level B (2)

22
Q

1 supporting controlled trial, at least 2 supporting case series that were descriptive studies in humans, or expert opinion

A

level C (3)

23
Q

1) Was there a representative patient sample at a well-defined point in the course of disease?
2) Was the follow-up sufficiently long and complete?
3) Were objective outcome criteria applied in a “blind” fashion?

A

is the prognostic (case-control) study valid

24
Q

summary of medical literature

A

meta-analysis or systematic review

- both are overviews

25
Q

1) Did the review address a clearly focused question?
2) Were the criteria used to select articles for inclusion appropriate and reproducible?
3) Were the studies of high quality?
4) Was the search detailed and exhaustive? Were contacts made with authors when questions arose?

A

questions to ask for meta-analysis or systematic review