Pricing Flashcards

1
Q

Sad state of pricing 1

A
  • few firms employ great research on pricing
  • rather stick to simplistic methods such as: percentage over cost, or competition
  • price has largest effect on profits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sad state of pricing 2

A
  • managers know about their costs

- fail to understand consumer’s response to price change or willingness to purchase at x price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

economics - supply/demand in the real world

A

reasons for why supply/demand isn’t directly applicable

  1. cost-based pricing - firms may only price based on their costs and ignore consumers
  2. invisible handshake - perceived unfairness of profits prevent prices from rising in certain cases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

economics - elasticity

A

understanding elasticity is important, profits may be lost when demand is unknowingly inelastic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

accounting insights

A
  • information on source of costs - valuable to marketers

- costs are central to finding breakeven points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marketing vs pricing

A

marketing in the spirit of needs and wants, such as consumer oriented product development.
pricing is meant to profit maximize with the consumer as the focal point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

company perspective pricing

A

create product > has a cost > add a profit = price to consumer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

marketing perspective pricing (target costing)

A

analyze consumer > pick a target price > produce a product based on constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

EVC

A
  • the maximum a customer should be willing to pay for your product
  • purchase price of next best alternative
  • add your value to calculate EVC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

two ways to increase EVC

A

reduce costs

increase value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

complication 1- incentive

A

customers reason to pay more-
managers need be aware of:
-ability to pay, myopia, uncertainty, ignorance, switching costs, perceptions on fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

complication 2- identify value

A

different types of value-
economic value- post purchase costs
functional value- incremental value
experiential value- customer service, loyalty, design
social value- prestige, social reference groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

complication 3 - tradeoffs

A

take the price of next best alternative
+ $ value of advantages
- $ value of disadvantages
= economic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Economics and price sensitivity

A

price sensitivity is heterogeneous in consumers, how to price and appeal to as many consumers as possible
segment the market “willingness to pay” - price discriminate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Price lining - versioning

A

offer different product (quality) variations at different prices and have consumers self-select
-airline seating, damaged goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

second market discounting

A

produce unbranded version of product
take advantage of unused capacity
works well when : fixed costs and level of cannibalization are stable

17
Q

sequential skimming

A

initially price high for insensitive market, then periodically drop price to capture more sensitive consumers

18
Q

periodic discounting

A

price high at beginning of period, lower at end of period

19
Q

random discounting

A

price high throughout the period but insert random discounts, attractive when mix of informed/uninformed consumers. -people buy on need

20
Q

product differentiation/ price sensitivity

A

EVC is clear and obvious- consumers are willing to pay in approximate relation to this value
When firms can’t create product value or uniqueness- they can create perceptions of uniqueness
-prevent consumers from discovering lack of uniqueness

21
Q

manipulating perceptions

A

4 Ps

Product, price, promotion, place

22
Q

Psychology and pricing

A

willingness to pay affected by economic factors such as wealth, but also psychological factors

23
Q

sunk investment effect

A
failure to ignore unrecoverable transaction costs
examples:
-bar cover charge
-buffets
-declining stock
-game ticket
-draft picks
24
Q

value function

A

when gains/losses are at lower levels, changes on a per dollar basis feel greater $50 when you paid $100, $50 when you paid $10,000

25
Q

marketing implication of value function

A

marginal disappointment stabilizes as losses
get greater
marginal happiness stabilize as gains get greater
= integrate losses and segregate gains

26
Q

transaction utility

A

acquisition utility - compared to absolute utility

transaction utility - compared to a reference point of utility, the psychological value

27
Q

reference point on competitor prices

A

consumers accept price increases when they reference inherent quality increase
consumers are sensitive to price increase when they can’t reference indirect costs cause

28
Q

reference point on seller costs

A

consumers believe in “fair profit” but often lack knowledge about all the costs involved in production
-grossly underestimate firm’s costs (material)

29
Q

reference points on previous price

A

consumers anchor on previous prices - don’t adjust for market conditions or cost increases

30
Q

on-going vs one-time relationships

A
  • relationships equate to well-known reference points on price and inability to raise price much
31
Q

enhancing price attractiveness

A
increase the reference point
encourage favorable comparisons
increase perceived vendor cost
obscure the reference price
report the per-usage price
32
Q

multiple mental accounts

A

money is fungible, but people tend to allocate expenditures into categories
categories have reference points- consumption is evaluated within the context of its category

33
Q

pricing ethics?

A

collusion- illegal
price discrimination- increasingly present, technically fair
gouging- no such thing, supply/demand