Price Optimization Flashcards

1
Q

Define “Cost based” rate

A

Estimate of the future cost associated with individual risk transfer. This is based on expected claims, claim handling expenses, underwriting expenses, policy acquisition expenses, reasonable profit, investment income, and other risk transfer costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define “Rating cell”

A

Combination of rating variables from a rating plan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define “Risk profile”

A

Set of characteristics listed in the insurer’s rating plan required to calculate the premium. People with the same risk profile should have the same expected risk, loss & expenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define “Unfairly discriminatory rates”

A

Unfair discrimination exists if, after allowing for practical limitations, price differentials fail to reflect equitably the differences in expected losses and expenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defines “price optimization”

A

The process of maximizing or minimizing a business metric using sophisticated tools and models to quantify business considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples of business metrics that are maximized via price optimization

A

Marketing goals, profitability and policyholder retention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 types of optimization used in ratemaking

A
  1. Ratebook Optimization: cost and demand models are utilized to adjust the factors in an existing structure.
  2. Individual Price Optimization: creates a price based on cost & demand models at the individual policy level.
  3. Hybrid Optimization: create a new rate factor based on a demand model that supplements a cost based rating algorithm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Factors incorporated in Hybrid Optimization models

A
  • expected retention
  • profitability
  • rate of change from the current premium to the proposed premium
  • premium volume
  • expense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compares price optimization and the traditional ratemaking approach

A
  • Rating Plan Development (same): Base rate (loss cost) × adjustment factor
  • Adjustment factors (same): Age, gender, territory, make & model year, ect
  • Adjustment to rates based on market, regulartory and other considerations (different) : -
    – Traditional Approach are based on Qualitative assessment
    – Price Optimization Approach are based on Qualitative and quantitative assessments informed by analysis of risk related and non risk related data
  • Basis for adjustment to rates (different) :
    – Traditional Approach is Insurer judgement
    – Price Optimization Approach is Automatic, systematic analysis (modeling)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Price optimization poses several problems to regulators

A
  • Because price optimization impacts the selections as opposed to the cost based indications, regulators may be challenged when reviewing the insurer’s rates, as it may not be clear how exactly optimization influenced the selections.
  • There is a large amount of information related to the price optimization process to consider.
  • Regulators must rely on the insurers to provide accurate and complete information on the rates, as well as the adjustments required to produce those rates.
  • Regulators currently do not have the necessary data for an independent evaluation of a large portion of the insurer’s modeling & calculations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

List some criticisms against price optimization

A
  • penalizes customers, as it involves insurers attempting to charge the highest possible price without causing the consumer to switch.
  • can result in unfairly discriminatory rates
  • Insurers may raise prices of those who are less likely to shop around, many of whom are low income and minority consumers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

List some ways in which different regulators have responded to price optimization

A
  • Many states defined price optimization and prohibited the defined practice
  • Some state regulators believe that the existing state laws are sufficient to cover price optimization. No bulletin/ public announcement specific to optimization is necessary
  • Many states have not yet received a filing that mentioned that price optimization was used in the rating process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List some options for potential regulatory responses to price optimized rating schemes that were recommended by the Price Optimization Task Force

A
  • Determine which price optimization practices, if any, are allowed in the state
  • Define any constraints on the price optimization process & outcomes.
  • Develop regulatory guidance on statutory rate requirements, to ensure that the rates are not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory
  • Enhance filing requirements
  • Require explanation/ reasoning to support any proposed rate that deviates from the actuarially indicated rate
  • Change the filing laws to require more transparency (after considering state laws on confidentiality).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

List examples of constraints that regulators can apply to optimization

A
  • limit the price adjustment to be between the current rate and actuarially indicated rate, and always move towards the actuarial indicated rate
  • require that the rating factors selected be: between the current and actuarial indicated factors; or within a confidence interval around the current/ indicated factors; or directionally consistent with the current factors
  • limit the variables that can be used in defining a risk class
  • only allow price optimization to be applied to classes of at least a certain size
  • price optimization adjustment to rating factors must produce rates that maintain cost based differences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe how filing requirements can be enhanced to accommodate price optimization

A
  • cons* r whether the actuarial indication is the point estimate, or any selected value within the confidence interval around the point estimate
  • consider whether to require actuarial certification that the indications in the rate filing are based exclusively on the cost considerations, and are not otherwise adjusted
  • consider requiring disclosure of any adjustments to rates that are not based on expected costs
  • consider disallowing non cost based adjustments to selected rates or rating factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List ways in which regulators can ensure that optimization is more transparent

A
  • disclosure of whether price optimization is used
  • disclosure of differences in proposed prices for the existing and new customers that have the same risk profile
  • file a report to show the distribution of the expected loss ratios under both the current and proposed prices.
  • disclosure of all data sources, models and risk classifications used by the insurer to calculate the premium
  • disclosure of which rating factor(s) are impacted by price optimization; the magnitude of the impact by factor; and the cumulative impact of price optimization for all existing and new applicants for insurance
  • require a certification by an actuary that all non cost based considerations impacting the proposed rates and rating factors are documented in the filing.
17
Q

Recommended criteria in which a selected rate that is not between the current and indicated rate may be acceptable if

A
  • it is disclosed
  • it complies with state law
  • it is demonstrated to be consistent with actuarial ratemaking principles and Standards of Practice
18
Q

List examples of factors that regulators should prohibit be used in price optimization

A
  • Price elasticity of demand
  • Propensity to shop for insurance
  • Retention adjustment (at the individual level)
  • Propensity to ask questions or file complaints
19
Q

List 3 recommendations of the Task Force for the states

A
  1. Consider issuing a bulletin to discuss insurer’s use of methods
    that may produce non cost based rates
  2. Consider enhancing requirements for personal lines filings to increase disclosure and transparency around rates/ rate indications/ rate selections
  3. Analyze models used by insurers in ratemaking to ensure that the model meets state law and conforms to actuarial principles