Preparing for negotiation of commercial agreements Flashcards

1
Q

name 3 dimensions of negotiations:

A
  1. Interpersonal skills, communication tactics
  2. Deal dimension/ agreement structure
    3 process setup (away from the table); the right parties, the right issues, etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is concessions:

A

When a party is yielding or compromising on issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What behavior fits high co-operation with low and high assertiveness

A

Low assertive: accomodating

High: integrating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Behavior with low cooperation and low and high assertiveness:

A

Low: Avoding

High; Asserting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Best accomodating strategies:

A

Treat other party with respect
Avoid cycles of angry retalitory behavior
Not using positive words as reasonable and generous
Not responding immediately to the other party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Best integrating strategies

A

Compromise on something lesser important to get something more important
Being firm in insisting that ones interests are met
Engaging in collaborative consideration instead of positional barganing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Avoiding strategy

A

Avoding needless pleaseantries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Best assertive practice

A

improve one’s BATNA

Using a few of best arguments to support position

Working to see where possible one owns needs are met.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Seduction:

A

Uses various tools as job opportunities etc not really issues in the negotiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Psychological warfare

A

Use unfair measure not within the ethics of negotiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exerting pressure

A

Impose unreasonable pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hidden agenda:

A

Topics discussed does not cove true objective of one party. Ask to understand background for concession to uncover real agenda.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shock effect

A

A sudden surprising information is provided to impact the counterparty’s assumptions for their negotiation position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Information drain:

A

One party ask for information used to undermine other party. Ask for reciprocity here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

War of attrition

A

One party may drag the negotiation for a long time, when other party is under time pressure. One defensive mechanism is to offer an incentive for a swift conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Budget framework

A

During financial negotiations, may refer to a budget frameowrk that makes it impossible for more concessions.

17
Q

Salami tactics

A

One party continuously ask for small concessions that in total become large concessions.

18
Q

Last-minute concessions.

A

Ask for big concession after the deal has been ended.

19
Q

Four reasons why companies purse a JV

A
  1. to enter markets
  2. To gain scale
  3. To share risk for risky investment
  4. To access skills and labour
20
Q

Five personality types

A

Visionary: Champion of radical change, but too quick to rush into new things

Guard: Rational with decisions grounded a thoughtfully decided. May be blind to change

Motivator: A compelling leader for change, but may believe in vision over facts

Flexible: Love variation and exploring different options. May overanalyse too many options.

Catalyst: True champion of group making, the less extreme of the different types. May deliver average performance due to average type.

21
Q

Teams lead to higher and better results

A

Yes

22
Q

Why are multiparty interaction more difficult:

A

Increased information processing
Greater necessity for complex decision rules
- Search for common ground and coordination complexity
More complex interpersonal process
- Range of knowledge, skills and abilities
- coalition formation

23
Q

high power parties experience:

A

Bias to action
Insensitivity to social nuance
domination

24
Q

low power parties

A

Sensitivity to monitor and adapt to social situations

Greater understanding of social realtionshipsf