prep jansen lecture Flashcards

1
Q

1. Trial design of voyager

2. 2 substrata

3. Major finding, %ages, NNT, ARR

4. Stratification with plavix

5. do need to adjust 2.5 for renal function

6. Advantage of Xarelto 2.5

7. what was the study follow up.

A

Asa + Xarelto vs. Asa alone

Surgical vs. endo revasc

plavix use.

  1. LDR (low dose riva reduced MALE - limb ischemia, major amp and mace at 3 years ARR 2.6% 17.3 vs. 191. HR 0.85 p =-0.008, NNT 39 however increased TIMI major bleeding but not fatal or intracranial bleeding.
  2. Benefits shown independent of plavix use.
  3. no
  4. dual pathway inhibition.

7, q6mo out to a median of 28 months and a total of 3 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Paper that addressed your concern re voyager

A

Not a paper. TCT connect 2020 leat braker. Drug coated substudy. Connie Hess presented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the primary endpoint again of the Voyager study

A

ALI, amjor amp vasc cause, MI, stroke, cv death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many patients in voyager

A

6564 patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe your patient?

A

74 presenting 2 years after complex coronary intervention. Had 2 stents to the LAD and one to the RCA with imaging guidance.

Only on ASA 81

PMHx DM with and A1c tx with empaglifozin 10 and metformin

HLD cresotr 20

CKD III

Also with a carotid of 50-69% amndbilateral decreased avis with a decreased DP on the left.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Your patients labs

A

A1c 7.2,

LDL 82

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Xarelto mechanism

A

Xa inhibtor which blocks the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin

also inhibits PAR 1 preventing plt agg.

Asa also address plt aggregation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Compass set up

How many patients

Mean follow up

What happended to Xarelto 5 mg bid

Inclusion

efficacy outcome

saftey

results

A

3 arms

  • Xarelto 2.5 mg bid + asa 100 mg once daily

asa 100 mg daily

Xarelto 5 mg bid alone

30 K

2 years,

This was not superior to asa alone so no longer studies.

CAD/PAD or both

CV death, stroke or MI

major bleeding ISTH criteria and fatal bleeding, sx bleeding into critical organ and bleeding leading to hosp (all bleeding leading to hosp or acute careas major)

Results 4.1 % v.s 5.4% ASA 0.76 ; 95% CI 0.66- P M0.001 24% RRR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

COMPASS RRR

percentages

ARR

NNT

A

24%

  1. 1 vs. 5.4 for mace (CV death,mi storke)
  2. 3%

76

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Compass inclusion

A

CAD or PAD or both based on inclusion criteria

Patients with coronary artery disease who were younger than 65 years of age were also required to have documentation of atherosclerosis involving at least two vascular beds or to have at least two additional risk factors (current smoking, diabetes mellitus, an estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 ml per minute, heart failure, or nonlacunar ischemic stroke ≥1 month earlier)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Huge thing about compass

A

Mortality reduction!!! HR 0.82 4.1 to 3.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly