premise indicators Flashcards
premise indicators
because, since, for , for the reason , in that , given that , as indicated by , due to, furthermore
what is a premise?
factual statements ( contains facts) or claims
all humans are mortal . socrates is human . so Socrates is mortal
what is the premise and what is the conclusion?
socrates is mortal is the conclusion.
premise : all humans are mortal; socrates is human .
what are conclusion indicators?
thus, therefore, hence, consequently, as a result , so , accordingly, it follows that , it must be that
what questions you should ask yourself to identify premises?
why should I believe this argument?
how to identify conclusions what questions should you ask yourself ?
what does the author want me to believe
what is a stimulus ?
stimulus-reacting to what you reading , reacting to what they give you
do all stimulus have an arguments?
No, sometimes is just fact sets ,
fact sets don’t contain conclusions
what is in the prove family ?
-must be true *
-main point
-point at issue /point an agreement
-method of reasoning
- flaw in the reasoning*
-parallel reasoning
- the stimulus and the question stem is directing you to accept the truth of the stimulus and use it to prove the truth of the answer choices
what is in the disapprove family ?
-cannot be true
what is in the help family ?
assumption *
justify conclusion
strengthen / support *
-resolve the paradox
(stimulus )
-arrow going up
(answer choices)
*accept the true of the answers and if true which answer choice has a positive effect on the information in the stimulus
what is prephasing?
predicting the right answer before looking at the answer choices
-predicting what you know to be true about the correct answer
ask yourself :
what must the correct answer DO in order to be correct
what is in the hurt family ?
weaken questions
(stimulus)
arrow going up
(answer choices)
which of the answer if true has a (-) effect on the information in the stimulus
is pre phasing always possible ?
yes, but each type has a different approach. .
a good prephrase to weaken the conclusion, “Thus, we should vote for the mayor’s proposal,” would be something like, “the correct answer will give a reason why we should not vote for the mayor’s proposal.”
how to approach Prove family : must be true questions, main point, point at issue method, flaw in reasoning reasoning, and parallel reasoning
how to approach disprove family : cannot be true
the arrow in the diagram is going down. For both families Prove and disprove we accept stimulus as its given and find the answer choice that is supported by the stimuli
*for both of these families we can eliminate answer choices that introduces a new idea
how to approach assumption , justify conclusion, strengthen/support and resolve the paradox questions? (help family )
how to approach hurt family
hurt family (weaken questions)
for help family we accept the anwers and if true which answer choice has a (+) effect on the information in the stimulus
for hurt family (weaken questions)
which answer choices if true has a (-) effect on the information in the stimulus
what does OR mean? in LSAT world
or means 1 or 2 or both
what is an inference?
the result that you get when you combine different facts / ideas together (another fact)
what does some mean?
at least one
when the question ask you why is the argument bad
flaw question
when the question asks you to fix the argument
strengthen and justify questions
when the question ask you to worsening the question
weaken question
What is in family #1 ? prove
Must be true questions,
Main point
point at issue / point of agreement
method of reasoning
flaw in reasoning
Parallel reasoning
what is in family #4? disapprove
cannot be true question
for family #1 Prove and family #4 disapprove they are both similar in what aspect?
you agree with the author and accept stimulus
you can eliminate and answer choice that introduces new idea
must be true question
pick answer choice that has to be true based on what you read
must
100% true
eliminate answer choices that introduce new idea
most strongly supported questions
what is likely based on what you read
can be true - must be true
if the statements above are true , which one of the following must be true ?
must be true question
which one of the following can be properly INFERRED from the passage?
must be true question
if the information above is correct , which one of the following conclusions can be properly drawn on the basis of it ?
must be tue question
the statements above , if true , most strongly support which one of the following
must be true
which one of the following is best illustrated by the statements above
most strongly supported question
Also must be true
Must be True questions will have the following?
properly concluded , infer
relative (comparative)
SW is the best tennis player this year
SW is better than VW
most strongly supported questions will have the following
most supported, best illustrated, could be true
Absolute(it doesn’t continue)
SW is the best tennis player
conditional reasoning is….
absolute
inferences are ?
your prephases
combine two things together to make a 3rd thing
in must be true questions we ,…..
trust the author