Prelinguistic Development: Perception Flashcards

1
Q

General Issues

A

Perception vs. Production
Hypotheses (Maturation vs. Learning
Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Controversial Issues

A

Role of Experience (vs. Maturation)
Methods
Uniqueness to Humans
Phonological Deafness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hypotheses for Prelinguistic Development

A

A. Infants are born with limited perceptual ability

B. Infants are born with ability to perceive most and possibly all speech sounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Methods

A
Sucking rate (below 0;6)
Heart rate (below 0;6)
Head turn (0;6 and up)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Habituation Paradigm

A

Basic property of the CNS
New stimuli leads to dishabituation
Repetition leads to habituation
New stimuli leads to dishabituation (if heard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eimas et al (1971)

A

Infants: 26 @ 0;1 & 26 @ 0;4
Stimuli: [pa] vs. [ba]
Method: sucking rate
Results: Difference perceived at 0;1 and 0;4
Conclusion: Infants can make fine phonetic discriminations (universal theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eilers et al (1979)

A

Infants: 8 Spanish & 8 English 0;6-0;8
Stimuli: [pa] vs [ba] English vs. Spanish
Method: Head turn
Results: % of Correct Responses
English Infants: 92% English 42% Spanish
Spanish Infants: 86% English 80% Spanish
Conclusion: Some sounds made may be harder to perceive than others. (i.e. infants may not be capable at birth at perceiving all speech sounds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Werker & Tees (1984)

A

Infants: English 0;6- 1;0
Stimuli: Hindi dental vs. Retroflex stops (Salish: [k’] vs. [q’]
Method: head turning
Results: % of Correct Responses
0;6-0;8 –> 95% Hindi, 80% Salish
0;8-0;10–> 68% Hindi, 52% Salish
0;10-0;12 –> 20% Hindi, 10% Salish
Conclusions: 1. Support the Universal Theory
2. Ability lost around 10 months for non-native sounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Juszyk 1997 (Summary)

A
Infants perceive wide range of speech (vowels & consonants)
perfer their mother's voice (birth)
Perfer their native language (brith)
Perfer their own names (0;4)
Perfer frequent phonotactics (0;9)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Perceptual Assimilation Model (Best)

A

We assimilate non-native sounds to those similar to the native language.

1) Japanese speakers with English /r/,/l/
2) English Speakers with Zulu clicks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Phonological Deafness (Doupoux & Peperkamp)

A

Infants form prelexical representations around 1 yr.

Use them to perceive all speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why are infants so good?

A
  1. Aids phonological acquisition

2. Word segmentation (majority of words are never heard in isolation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summary of prelinguistic development (Perception)

A

Excellent perceptual abilities from birth
Ability lost around 1 yr.
Necessary for subsequent word acquisition
Phonological deafness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly