Prelim 2 (10/29) Flashcards
Why think that working memory involves 2 components?
ELD & KF; perform well on auditory but not visual tasks and vv
Semantic memory
Memory for facts
What is the role of executive function?
Inhibiting immediate responses / impulse control
What is the role of the self (curse of knowledge + projection)?
Cannot unknow what we know, project it onto others (e.g. tapping a song - sounds so clear to us that we assume others know it)
Evidence for diminish with distance
Cat activates tiger, lion, tiger activates stripes, so lion weakly activates stripes (more so than doctor)
Necessity of spatiotemporal continuity (what is it + evidence)
Object perception is broken when ST continuity is violated (familiarization studies + babies -> stare longer when ST continuity violated)
Modular characteristics of causal perception
- Fast -
- Domain specific -
- Encapsulated -
Monkey studies on theory of mind
Chimpanzees and monkeys seem to use ToM or know when someone is unable to perceive them (taking food) for ecologically appropriate tasks
Evidence of distinct types of memory
Patients like HM, KC, Susie McKinnon - episodic but not semantic memory and vice versa; long-term but not working memory and vice versa
Empiricism (def and caricature)
Mind is a blank slate; CARICATURE = no difference between a child and a rock (<- innate learning devices exist but rely on many experiences)
Human-robot interaction and theory of mind
People attribute personalities and emotional states to robots - believe roombas have feelings, feel bad “hurting” a robot, happier to help a computer that has helped them
Children and causal reasoning experiments (including screening off)
Children can identify “blickets” and adapt their behaviors (e.g. hovering an object over something to turn it on) with ease even after only seeing one example/non-example
What is trace theory?
Abstract principle explaining what we can shorten (“who does Mary want to win” can’t be “who does Mary wanna win” but “I want to win” can be “I wanna win”)
How is causal reasoning domain general?
Causal reasoning can be applied to a variety of diverse situations and is not limited to one specific area
What are the steps in a Poverty of stimulus argument?
- Children are not exposed to all complex grammatical/linguistic ideas
- Mostly base knowledge off positive, not negative, evidence
- Can perfectly use native grammar
Grammar vs meaning
We can understand concepts that are meaningless but grammatical (“colorless green ideas sleep furiously”)
Explain mind perception (Heider-Simmler animation, Johnson studies)
Once an object displays certain cues (e.g. having eyes or moving in a certain way like the triangles) it is seen as an “agent”
Explain patient WBA
Lesions to brain gyri thought to control perspective - fails to understand that things are different from others’ view (e.g. how a sports rival would feel about the same game)
Working memory
“Short-term” memory
Birdsong case for nativism
Birds reared in captive isolation still produce similar songs to their wild counterparts - SOMETHING is innate
Schlottman & Shanks (causal perception)
Insensitivity of causal perception to contingency information
Infant response to causal perception stimuli (esp Kotovsky & Baillargeon; Ball 1973)
When the appearance of motion is delayed/interrupted even a little, infants no longer perceive 1 as moving 2 (temporal gap) *
What is screening off?
When one variable is eliminated as potentially causal (e.g. if A causes C, it doesn’t matter if A&B cause C b/c we already know/assume A is causal)
What is an example of prior expectation in visual perception?
Same photo appears like a bump or dent due to our expectation that light is abovehead