Pre Seen Flashcards

1
Q

Knight v Knight

A

Lord Langdale

The certainties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Re snowden

A

Dehors the will theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ottoway v Norman

A

Fully secret trust of land valid even though not in writing

Basic test:

  • intention (legal obligation re snowden)
  • communication
  • acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wallgrave v tebbs

A

No certainty if not communicated before death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re boyes

A

Legacy to solicitor, letter later found

Resulting trust to the next of kin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Re youg

A

Chauffeur witness, still entitled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Re Diggles

A

Not merely a wish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re Dean

A

Trust for maintenance of animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pettingual v pettingual

A

Residual legatees watch for failure, resulting trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v District Auditor, ex p West Yorkshire

A

Sufficiently certain but too big to manage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Gardam

A

Limited means created certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aberdeen Railway v Blaikie Bros

A

Can’t enter engagement he may have personal interest in which may conflict with duty to other beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nestle v National Westminster Bank plc

A

Duty to act for all beneficiaries, maintain fair balance between them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pitt v Holt

A

Lord walker

Good faith, responsibly, reasonably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Re Ridsel

A

Court administration of trust expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Re Ministry’s Settlement

A

If no link/connection not enforced

17
Q

Hunter v Moss

A

Subject matter defined, identifiable and proportion of each beneficiary’s interest clear

18
Q

White and Others v Williams and Others

A

Similar charitable purpose

19
Q

Kings v Bultitude

A

Advancement of their purposes, general charitable intent

20
Q

Re fingers will trust

A

General charitable intention despite institution ceasing to exist

21
Q

McGovern v Attorney General

A

Political purposes if advocating changes in law/policy

22
Q

Bowman v Secular Society Ltd

A

Charities cannot pursue political objectives

23
Q

MacPhail v Doulton

A

Class test

23
Q

Re Hardwood

A

Easier to find charitable intention if never existed

24
Q

Philips v RSPB

A

Cy pres applied because underlying charitable intention

25
Q

Virgo

A

Void, needs to be charitable