Duties And Liabilities Flashcards
Holder v holder
Trustee nots allowed to purchase trust property
Exceptional case
Klug v klug
Courts can interfere with trustee power if acted in bad faith
Tenperest v lord camoys
If no bad faith court not interfere
Pitt v Holt
Good faith, responsible, reasonably
Re Hastings bass
Where trustees given discretion and act in good faith courts should not interfere unless:
Irrelevant considerations considered
Relevant ignored
Schmidt v rosewood trust
Duty to give info
Courts supervise
Howe v Earl of Dartmouth
Trustee must act impartially
Strike a balance
Re kershaws
Advancement
Wider meaning than just financial benefit
Armitage v nurse
Trust excluded liability of the trustees for loss or damage unless caused by trustee fraud
Re brodgen
Reasonable steps to recover debt
Re wragg
Apply money for purchase of property where profit expected
Cowan v scarfill
Not required to follow advice, need good reason
Speight v Gaunt
Same precautions ordinary man would take
Cowan v scargill, Robert
The trustees must not refrain from making investments by reasons of views they hold
Hawkesley v may
Beneficiaries need not make first demand for payment