Power And Influence Flashcards
Def of power Robert Dahl
A has the power over B to thé extent that they Can gets B to do smtg that B would otherwise not do
Def of power Parietti
Dahl’s def+ all thé variations (bcs contested notion) are all designed to study certain form of power: def has to bé in a context
7 aspects ti distinguish btwn def
Relation of influence
Intentionality
Ability or actions
Observable or latent
Relational or in structures
Necessity of effectiveness
Needing to change behaviour or also ideas
Explain relation to influence
Is influence power?
Some Say yes (for ex Wrong): authority and persuasion are still forms of power so influence=form of power
Some Say no: power= thé ability to change others based won PRESUMED capabilities
Intentionality
Does power have to bé intentional?
Yes: power is intentional, what is not intentional is influence : power=” thé capacity to producer intended and foreseen effects on others” (Wrong) so power =/ accidental or coincidental
No: it Can bé accidental
Ability/ act
Can one possess power?
Yes: it is about thé capacity to act
No: power is about thé exercise, it needs to bé exercised
Observable/ latent
Does power need to bé observable?
Yes: based on Dahl’s def
No:
.power also through keeping things off thé agenda (‘second face’ : see barrier model week 4)
.power Can also shaped people’s interests and keep thé unaware (‘third face’: lukes and also Foucault)
.postcolonial féminist view: smtmes résistance cannot bé Seen or expresses, kept invisible (After colonisation, no politics seems to bé interested in women, study them… Liké if they do not exist: kept INVISIBLE)
Relational/ structural
Where is power located?
A. Relational: power relation, power OVER smn/ smtg
.implies power asymmetry: ruler+subject
.Arendt: power is evil, Always involves oppression
.féminisme and marxisme: power= domination and subordination so it is power over…
. intersectionality: multiple layers of domination ( for Marx or femisnism: women/ proletariat)
B. Structural: power exist in sociétal norms
.(self)-regulation and conditioning
.no disposition of power in anyone
C.structural and relational AT thé same Time (Meier and Blum)
Effectiveness
Does it have to bé effective to bé power?
.yes otherwise it is a threat
.no:
..thé likelihood of effectiveness is often enough, there is a probalbility of success
..violence is sign of declining power (Arendt)
Change behaviour or also ideas?
What change should bé brought to bé power?
.beh: otherwise no (observable) effects
.ideas: internalised, Can affect future
Two main approaches of power
Power as
A a resource, possessing power
B an instrument, applying power
Hard power
. Military + economic means: force
Def soft power
Nye:”thé ability to get preferred outcomes through co-optive means of agenda-setting, persuasion, and attraction”
Différent capabilities/ sources of soft power according to Masood
Trade and industry
Agriculture and industry
Technology
Diplomatic services, intelligence
Information, media
Critics of soft power
. Réalistes: soft power is still based on hard power
. Espcially useful to contraste with hard power but broad concept