Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Flashcards
What is the preferred classification for vault/pelvic organ prolapse?
- Standardised classification systems should be used for assessment and documentation of POP, including vault prolapse.
When is urodynamic testing required?
- Routine urodynamic assessment is not recommended in women with PHVP.
In what setting should a patient with PHVP be assessed?
- Clinicians should work as part of a pelvic floor MDT.
Are quality of life (QoL) measures of value?
- Patient assessment should address QoL issues using standardised tools.
What preventive techniques are of value at hysterectomy?
- McCall culdoplasty at time of vaginal hysterectomy is effective in preventing subsequent PHVP.
- Suturing the cardinal and uterosacral ligaments to the vaginal cuff at the time of hysterectomy is effective in preventing PHVP following both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies.
- Sacrospinous fixation (SSF) at time of vaginal hysterectomy should be considered when vault descends to the introitus during closure.
Does subtotal hysterectomy have a place in prevention of PHVP?
- Subtotal hysterectomy is not recommended for the prevention of PHVP.
Are there preferred suture materials for vault support at the time of hysterectomy?
- There is inadequate and conflicting evidence over use of permanent sutures in the short term and no evidence of benefit in the long term; they can be associated with high suture exposure rates.
Is pelvic floor therapy of value in management of PHVP?
- Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an effective treatment option for women with stage I–II vaginal prolapse, including PHVP
What is the place of vaginal devices?
- Vaginal pessaries are an alternative treatment option for women with stage II–IV PHVP.
What are the indications for surgery?
- Surgical treatment should be offered to women with symptomatic PHVP after appropriate counselling.
Who should undertake surgery?
- PHVP surgery should be performed by RCOG-accredited subspecialist urogynaecologist, or
gynaecologists who can demonstrate an equivalent level of training or experience.
What is an acceptable successful result after surgical treatment?
- Patient-reported outcomes, including patient-reported success rates and relief of presenting
symptoms, should be the primary assessment outcomes. [New 2015] - Objective cure: important as it correlates to symptoms of vaginal bulge; a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage of I or O in the apical compartment seems to be acceptable and widely used as optimum postoperative result.
What surgical procedures are available for treatment of PHVP?
- The type of operation performed should be tailored to the individual patient’s circumstances
A comparison of surgical procedures
Open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) versus vaginal SSF
- Women should be aware that both ASC and SSF are effective treatments for primary PHVP.
- ASC is associated with significantly lower rates of recurrent vault prolapse, dyspareunia and postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) when compared with SSF. However, this is not reflected in significantly lower reoperation rates or higher patient satisfaction.
- SSF: associated with earlier recovery compared with ASC.
- SSF may not be appropriate in women with short vaginal length and should be carefully considered
in women with pre-existing dyspareunia.
A comparison of surgical procedures
Laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy (LSC and RSC)
- LSC can be equally effective as ASC in selected women with primary PHVP. LSC can include mesh
extension or be combined with other vaginal procedures to correct other compartment prolapse. - Limited evidence on effectiveness of RSC; therefore, it should only be performed in context of research or prospective audit following local governance procedures.