Management of Suspected Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal Women Flashcards
incidence of Suspected Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal Women
- Up to 10% of women will have some form of surgery during their lifetime for the presence of an ovarian mass.
- In premenopausal women almost all ovarian masses and cysts are benign.
- The overall incidence of a symptomatic ovarian cyst in premenopausal female being malignant is approximately 1:1000 increasing to 3:1000 at the age of 50.
nonovarian origin, in Suspected Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal Women
Ten percent of suspected ovarian masses are ultimately found to be non-ovarian in origin
The underlying management rationale is to minimise patient morbidity by:
● conservative management where possible
● use of laparoscopic techniques where appropriate, thus avoiding laparotomy where possible
● referral to a gynaecological oncologist where appropriate.
- Functional or simple ovarian cysts (thin-walled cysts without internal structures) which are less than 50 mm MX
Many ovarian masses in the premenopausal woman can be managed conservatively.
- Functional or simple ovarian cysts (thin-walled cysts without internal structures) which are less than 50 mm maximum diameter usually resolve over 2–3 menstrual cycles without the need for intervention.
Preoperative differentiation between the benign and the malignant ovarian mass in the premenopausal
woman can be problematic with no test or algorithm being clearly superior in terms of accuracy. Exceptions
Exceptions
are germ cell tumours with elevations of specific tumour markers such as alphafetoprotein (α-FP) and human
chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG).
If surgery is indicated, a approach
- If surgery is indicated, a laparoscopic approach is generally considered to be the gold standard for MX of benign ovarian masses.
- Laparoscopic MX is also cost-effective because of associated earlier discharge from hospital.
- Mini-laparotomy may be considered for occasional very large cysts of benign appearance. On rare occasions laparoscopic approach may be specifically contraindicated in an individual patient
orderline ovarian tumours
It is important to consider borderline ovarian tumours as histological diagnosis when undertaking any surgery for ovarian masses and, when such histological diagnosis is made or strongly suspected, referral to a gynaecological oncology unit is recommended. Preoperative diagnosis can be difficult with radiological & serum markers being relatively insensitive, especially in their differentiation from stage I ovarian epithelial cancers.
- Although up to 20% of borderline ovarian tumours appear as simple cysts on ultrasonography majority of such tumours will have suspicious ultrasonographic finding.
Types of adnexal masses
Benign ovarian 1 - Functional cysts 2 - Endometriomas 3 - Serous cystadenoma 4 - Mucinous cystadenoma 5 - Mature teratoma
Benign non-ovarian 1 - Paratubal cyst 2 - Hydrosalpinges 3 - Tubo-ovarian abscess 4 - Peritoneal pseudocysts 5 - Appendiceal abscess 6 - Diverticular abscess 7 - Pelvic kidney
Primary malignant ovarian
1 - Germ cell tumour
2 - Epithelial carcinoma
3 - Sex-cord tumour
Secondary malignant ovarian
1 - Predominantly breast and gastrointestinal carcinoma.
What is the role of history and examination in the assessment of women with suspected ovarian masses?
- A thorough medical history should be taken from the woman with specific attention to risk factors or
protective factors for ovarian malignancy and a family history of ovarian or breast cancer. Symptoms
suggestive of endometriosis should be specifically considered along with any symptoms suggesting possible ovarian malignancy: persistent abdominal distension, appetite change including increased satiety, pelvic or abdominal pain, increased urinary urgency and/or frequency. - A careful physical examination of the woman is essential and should include abdominal and vaginal
examination and the presence or absence of local lymphadenopathy. In the acute presentation with pain the diagnosis of accident to the ovarian cyst should be considered (torsion, rupture, haemorrhage). - Although clinical examination has poor sensitivity in the detection of ovarian masses (15–51%) its importance
lies in the evaluation of mass tenderness, mobility, nodularity and ascites.
What blood tests should be performed?
- A serum CA-125 assay does not need to be undertaken in all premenopausal women when an ultrasonographic diagnosis of a simple ovarian cyst has been made.21–23
- Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), α-FP and hCG should be measured in all women under age 40 with a complex ovarian mass because of the possibility of germ cell tumours.
● A serum CA-125 assay is not necessary when a clear ultrasonographic diagnosis of a simple ovarian cyst has
been made.
● If a serum CA-125 assay is raised and less than 200 units/ml, further investigation may be appropriate to
exclude/treat the common differential diagnoses
● When serum CA-125 levels are raised, serial monitoring of CA-125 may be helpful as rapidly rising levels are more likely to be associated with malignancy than high levels which remain static.
● If serum CA-125 assay more than 200 units/ml, discussion with a gynaecological oncologist is recommended.
What is the role of ultrasound in the assessment of suspected ovarian masses?
A pelvic ultrasound is the single most effective way of evaluating an ovarian mass with transvaginal
ultrasonography being preferable due to its increased sensitivity over transabdominal ultrasound.
What is the role of the routine use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of suspected ovarian masses?
At the present time the routine use of computed tomography and MRI for assessment of ovarian masses
does not improve the sensitivity or specificity obtained by transvaginal ultrasonography in the detection
of ovarian malignancy.
What is the best way to estimate the risk of malignancy?
An estimation of the risk of malignancy is essential in the assessment of an ovarian mass
- Simple models involve using discrete cut-off values such as CA-125, pulsatility index, resistance index.
- Intermediate models include morphology scoring systems and the risk of malignancy index.27,37
- Advanced models include artificial neural networks and multiple logistic regression models – a method for
determining whether each of a set of independent variables has a unique predictive relationship to a
dichotomous dependent variable.
Which RMI should be used?
A systematic review of diagnostic studies concluded that the RMI I is the most effective for women with
suspected ovarian cancer.
RMI = U x M x CA-125.
● The ultrasound result is scored 1 point for each of the following characteristics: multilocular cysts, solid areas,
metastases, ascites and bilateral lesions. U = 0 (for an ultrasound score of 0), U = 1 (for an ultrasound score of
1), U = 3 (for an ultrasound score of 2–5).
● The menopausal status is scored as 1 = premenopausal and 3 = postmenopausal.
● Postmenopausal can be defined as women who have had no period for more than one year or women over
the age of 50 who have had a hysterectomy.
● Serum CA-125 is measured in IU/ml and can vary between zero to hundreds or even thousands of units.
A recent systematic review36 showed the pooled sensitivities and specificities of an RMI I score of 200 in the detection of ovarian malignancies to be:
RMI I sensitivity specificity
RMI I sensitivity 78% (95% CI 71-85%), specificity 87% (95% CI 83-91%)