Possession of Stolen Property Flashcards
what type of crime is possession of stolen property
statutory crime
what is the s36 of GLAA def on possession of stolen property
any person who is found in possession of any goods other than stock or produce as defined in s13 of the theft stock act,
where there’s a reasonable suspicion that they have been stolen and is unable to give a satisfactory account of such possession
shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties which may be imposed on a conviction of theft
what are the elements of possession of stolen property
goods as referred to in s36
a reasonable suspicion that goods have been stolen
the person is unable to give a satisfactory account of the possession
describe the good referred to in s36 element
property capable of being stolen
discuss the found in possession of a person element
personal and direct control at time found by police
physical possession is crucial
including holding goods as an agent for another
discuss the reasonable suspicion that goods have been stolen element
finder must have reasonable suspicion that the goods have been stolen at the time they were found in suspects possession
reasonable suspicion is objective ascertainable
would a reasonable person in the policemens position, at the moment goods were found, have also suspected that the goods were stolen
use the Prince v Min of Justice case to discuss the factors to ascertain reasonable suspicion
Acc to Prince v Min of Justice
the factors to ascertain reasonable suspicion are:
nature and quantity of goods
place that goods are found
whether goods are new
possesser status and financial standing
posessers reaction when goods are found in his possession
discuss the no satisfactory explanation of possession element
accused must state where he obtained the goods and that his possession is innocent
satisfactory account:
reasonably possible
show possesser bona fide believed that possession was innocent
what happened in the case of Osman V Attorney General
in the case of Osman v The Attorney general
the accused had many tyres in his possession and were unable to give a satisfactory explanation
what happened in the case of S v Mothwa
the accused was convicted of robbery with aggravating circumstances
the accused provided a reasonable explanation supported by documents for the possession of goods