population theories and other questions Flashcards
Test#4 prep
Intro to population theory?
- The thinking on population-resource nexus can be traced back to the works of of Many of the ancient philosophers like Confucius (China), Kautilya (India), Ibn Khaldin (Arab).
- Kautilya, a contemporary of Plato, had written in his Arthashastra that ‘a large population is a source of political, economic and military strength of a nation
- Chinese philosopher, Confucius argued that a numerical balance be maintained between population and environment.
- In ancient Greece, the earliest thinkers favoured the expansion of population, but Plato was a restrictionist who advocated as absolute limit of population.
Malthusian theory of population growth: intro?
- Robert Malthus Thomas,English economist and Demographer: Essay on principle of pop in 1798
- first thinker who took the question of pop in a formal way
Malthusian theory of population growth: main body: theory?
- two axioms in which he described two ‘urges’ essential for human survival:
- food necessary; food production AP
- passion between sexes necessary and will continue and pop @GP
- widening gap- unequal distri of resources- capitalistic society- thus Malthus, defended capitalism set up.
- increasing gap- ultimately will lead to inevitable pt. of misery and poverty
- Classified the resisting force to increasing population in two grps
- positive checks: were related to mortality; like wars, disease, hunger - Malthusian catastrophe
- preventive checks: moral restraint (postponement of marriage) and vice like adultery, birth control and abortion
- HOwever, all that the preventive checks can do was to postpone positive checks and that the latter are inevitable.
Malthusian theory of population growth: main body: criticism?
- Deterministic and pessimistic theory; ignored the role of changing tech and consequent transformation in socio-econ set up of a society i.e. anti-cornucopian
- Prosperity and pop growth don’t always go hand in hand. as arsene Dumont argued in his social capillarity theory, desire to increase social status in the social order will keep a check on pop growth.
- confused moralist and scientific approaches
- desire to have children cannot be mixed with passion and desire for sex; biological vs social instinct
- AP and GP increase rarely seen in real world; doubling period for pop varies frm region-2-region as opposed to 25yrs predicted by Malthus
- overemphasized the inevitability of positive checks: Pessimistic; natural calamities hv also occured in developed countries
Malthusian theory of population growth: main body: merits and applicability?
- not so much wrong as he was premature
- bring the study of pop into the fold of Social sc. and initiated theory building ; said to be an ecological theory, first to link fertility/ecology of soil with pop growth
- raised awareness abt problem of food security, poverty and misery.
Applicability
- Malthusian channel by which a high level of population reduces income per capita is still relevant in poor developing countries that have large rural populations dependent on agriculture, as well as in countries that are heavily reliant on mineral or energy exports.
- When Malthus lived (1766 – 1834) the global population reached its first billion (in 1804). Today we have 7.6 billion. Even when we can find many arguments that this number is far too high for a sustainable situation on our planet there is statistically enough food produced for everybody. The biggest problem with food isn’t production but rather distribution
Marxian Theory of Population Growth: intro?
- There cud be no one universal law of pop growth and growth pattern and dynamics of pop change with the change in mode of production
- Marxian theory of population is based on as a reaction to the capitalistic mode of production and governance with ‘class struggle’ and ‘poverty’ seen as main driving forces of population growth among poor workers
Marxian Theory of Population Growth: theory?
- Each mode of production has its own economic and demographic laws eg. growth pattern of a nomadic society will be differnt frm that of settled cultivators
- His model more applicable In a capitalistic or feudal society society, following dialectical materialism
- In a capitalistic society, emerges the classes of ‘exploiters’ nd ‘exploited’ who hv mutually hostile and irreconciliable interests.
- The rich, work towards sole motive of ‘capital accumulation’ to increase their ‘surplus value’ (profit), while the poor workers try to accumulate labor, the only commodity they possess, through rapid pop growth.
- However with improvement in tech and surplus of labor, the rising pop becomes an industrial reserve army of unemployed and under-employed suffering in poverty and misery.
- Thus, poverty and misery aren’t natural ineveitabilities bt unpleasant gifts of capitalism
- The birth and death rates as well as size of family hv inverse correlation with level of wages.
Marxian Theory of Population Growth: criticism?
- unprecedented growth of pop mainly due to extension and improvement of medical faclities
- no simple co-relation betn increase in pop and decrease in real wages, numerous socio-political and economic factors at play
- over-emphasized and considered pvt property as the main cause of all evils
- may be relevant in capitalisic society, bt nt in say, primitive hunting and food gathering society
- Human Geographers J.S.Mill and Arsene Dumont suggested that the the desire for socio-economic capillarity and fear of poverty are main drivers to reduce family size.
Marxian Theory of Population Growth: applicability?
- Marxian theory, on the whole, fails to explain the population growth slowdown in Western countries, which can be better explained by arsene deumont’s socio-economic capillarity theory. that espouses that “Development is the contraception”
- Even in communist society, Marxian theory should make family planning policies obviated. However, in erstwhile USSR, factory workers were provided contraceptives to keep the bith rates low.
- In LDCs, Marxian theory has limited applicability though some elements like exploitation of worker class, concentration of capital, rising population and unemployment among workers are observed.
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: intro?
- Originally, by W.S.Thompson and F.W. Notestein, based on empirical observations of trends of fertility and mortality being experienced in Europe, N.America and Australia.
- characterized by conspicuous transition stages
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: theory: BOX?
- Three hypotheses (BOX):
- decline in mortality comes before the decline in fertility
- fertility eventually declines to match mortality
- socio-economic transformation of a society takes place simulataneously with its demographic transition
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: theory: stage 1?
- high Crude BR (Hedging risk) and high crude DR; mortality erratic due to epidemics and variable food supply;
- stable and slowly growing pop;
- low life expectancy; large family size considered an asset;
- predominantly agrarian society with limited growth of urbanisation;
- illiterate masses and poor health care;
- limited dev in tech and widespread religious orthodoxy;
- no example of this stage due to widespread penetration of modern medicine and so, this staage is called ‘pre-industrial or pre-modern stage’.
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: theory: stage 2?
- high and gradual declining fertility and a sharply reducing mortality rate and so, expanding stage of population
- early and late second stage (fertility also shows decline)
- as pop explodes, resource mobilization becomes significant, life expecancy improves, large families no longer an asset (JS Mill); process of industrialization, urbanization and modernization becomes prominent
- Most of developing countries, incl India
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: theory: stage 3?
- DR stabilized at a low level and BR declines with easy access to family planning methods
- Thus, a slowdown in GR
- demographic transition parallels social change
- Growth of an educated urban/industrial society with low Infant mortality, increased std of living and changing status of women (Arsene Dumont)
- India, as of 2013, can be placed in later half of the third stage (Sridhar) bt the decline in fertility rate more of coercive and policy induced rather than ‘Dumontian’ decline.
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: theory: stage 4?
- both BR and DR decline appreciably
- pop either stable or grows slowly
- pop highly industrialized and urbanized, technical know-how is abundant, deliberate controls on family size is common (Arsene Dumont and J.S.Mill), literacy and edu levels are high and high degree od labor specialization.
- eg. Anglo-american, west European countries, aus, Japan
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: criticism and merits?
- Merits:
- does provide an effective portrayal of world’s demographic history at macro level of generalization
- as an empirical generalization, helps in understnading transition process provided the situational context is properly understood.
- Criticisms:
- Acc to Loscky and Wildcose, theory is neither predictive nor its stages are sequential and inevitable eg. China entered 3rd stage owing to its one-child policy
- no comment on change in population due to migration
- The evidence of Mortality reversal in countries frm both developed and under-developed parts of the world.
Demographic Transition Theory of POpulation growth: Applicability?
- It must be remembered that the DTM is only a model and cannot necessarily predict the future.
- It is not applicable for high levels of development, as it has been shown that after a HDI of 0.9 the fertility increases again
- Some have claimed that DTM does not explain the early rapid fertility declines in much of Asia in the second half of the 20th century or the delays in fertility decline in parts of the Middle East.
Mortality Reversal and trends in different parts of the world: intro?
Declining mortality has long been a routine expectation in most of the world, aside from wartime interruptions. Many forecasts, including Demographic Transition model by Thompson and Notestein, envisage a global convergence to low mortality ,esp in stage IV.
Mortality Reversal and trends in different parts of the world: body?
Since the 1970s, however, in some regions of world, there is sharp increase in mortality rates, owing to natural reasons (age related mortality) and positive checks as suggested by Malthus(disease epidemics, wars). This trend of mortality is known as Mortality reversal and sometims refrred as stage V of DTM
MAP
Mortality Reversal and trends in different parts of the world: regional trnds?
- Developed countries such as Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden is ascribed to geriatric mortality i.e. as higher proportion of pop turns old, natural deaths abound.
- East Europe and Russia: political and economic challenges has led to health crisis and increasd mortality rates. In countries of the former Soviet Union, mortality from accidents and violence had reached very high levels by the late 1970s and increased through the 1990s
- Africa and West Asia: epidemics such as HIV (Uganda), wars (Genocide in Rwanda), poverty, lack of education and healthar facilities has led to low life expectancy and mortality reversal among adult pop; esp high in Zimbawe and Botswana
BOX: causes: natural (Japan, Germany); Health and epidemics(East europe and Russia); economic reversal (great depression in USA and europe); conflicts; env challenges
MAP
- CASE STUDY: RUSSIA
most well documnted; USSR witnessed quick decline in MR in 1940s and 50s due to high priority on univrsal healthcare by the communist regime.
However since mid 1960s, country has faced a worsening health crisis on acct of poor health care services and alcoholism, thereby experiencing a gradual decline in life expectancy in the 1970s and a further drop in the 1990s to a low of 66 years. In the 1990s in Russia, mortality attributed to homicide approached the world’s highest levels.
LIfe expectancy gap betn Russia and western nations has increasd frm 1-3yrs in 1965 to 13-15yrs in 21st century.
Mortality Reversal and trends in different parts of the world: demographic trnds?
- AGE: mainly observed in adult (working) pop, and nt the traditionally vulnerable chidren and elderly
- SEX: trend is predominant among men as compared to that among women, esp in older age grp. eg. In the year 2000 male life expectancy at birth in Russia was 59 years–below its level of 60 years in 1955–1956. The corresponding figures for the female population were 72 and 68 years, respectively.
- Economic class: Excess mortality in Eastern Europe has been increasingly concentrated among manual workers and low education groups
Mortality Reversal and trends in different parts of the world: concl?
worrisome as it is only going to strengthen in ‘spread’ and ‘degree’ on acct of increasing ageing pop (India, China SE Asia) and climate change induced food shortages, epidemics, disasters and conflicts.
Tehch intervntions like better healthcare may arrest Mortality reversal to certain extent, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa rgion. Also, emphasis should be placed to prepare for geriatric care across the nations as life expectancy cannot be increased beyond a limit, in line with ‘Pragmatic Possibilism’ of Taylor.
Optimum pop: intro?
- propounded by Edwin Cannon in 1924 and popularised by Dalton, Robbins and Carl Saunders
- ideal population which combined with resource availability, for a given level of tech dev, in the country will yield maximum prosperity. Most of the aforementioned thinkers equated prosperity with economic well-being and thus at the optimum population level, the per capita income and avg productivity of labor are highest. after that level, the law of diminishing returns begins to operate
DIAGRAM
optimum pop: body?
The optimum theory of population was put forward as a reaction to the Malthusian theory of population, bt instead of talking abt pop growth and its causes, it seeks to explain the fundamental relationship between population and resources.
Daltons’ formula for calculating deviation frm optimum pop (Maladjustment)
Criticisms:
- concept of resource (a function of available tech) as well as the availability of resource varies
- development is a subjective concept: what of social, ecological aspects (maximum viable pop a better measure in this regard).
- Due to its ‘mirage like’ characterstics, Robbins commented “OP is an interesting idea bt it is a sterile concept”
Comparisons with Malthusian Theoyr of pop
- Malthus- only takes into acct pop growth-foodsupply relationship, Cannon relates pop growth with all the available resources
- Unlike pessimism of Malthus, OP is more humanist, pragmatic and realistic since it does give due weightage to tech and recognises that growth of pop is nt always undesirable bt indispensable upto a certain level to efficiently utilise the resources available.