POLS 233 Final Exam Review Flashcards
despite their flaws, public opinion polls remain the best method available for understanding what the public thinks. why?
-no selection bias
-margin of error (sampling error)
what other ways do we have for understanding public opinion and what are the limitations of those methods?
convenience sample
limitations
-selection bias
-no way of evaluating how representative a sample is
population
full set of individuals who could potentially take part in the research
sample
a subset of the population
what is the difference between a probability and a non-probability sample?
in probability sampling, individuals are selected randomly, whereas, in non-probability sampling, the selection is based on accessibility or the researcher’s judgment.
why is probability sampling preferred?
-no selection bias (researchers do not choose who to interview)
-we can evaluate the representatives of the sample (margin of error)
why is it possible to get a reasonably close approximation of public opinion with a survey of 800-1000 respondents?
the larger the sample, the smaller the error
how do polling results change as you move from adults to registered voters to likely voters?
likely voters
-prior turnout
-knowledge about voting process
-correlates of voter turnout
how do pollsters determine likely voters?
most pollsters use a combination of questions that measure intention to vote, interest in the campaign, and past voting behavior. different pollsters use different sets of questions to help identify likely voters.
conventional wisdom is that the polls have gotten less accurate over time. is this true>
yes, but they were historically accurate in 2022
how do we evaluate the accuracy of polling
the best way to measure the accuracy of a poll is to look a its absolute error-the difference between a poll margin and the actual margin of the election (between the top two finishers in the election, not the poll)
weighted average error takes into account the number of polls done by a polling organization
polls are wrong but wrong in ways that make their predictions correct
pack
what does the margin of error tell us about a poll result? What does it tell us?
the margin of error describes how close we can reasonably expect a survey result to fall relative to the true population value. the margin of error that pollsters customarily report describes the amount of variability we can expect and indicate candidates’ level of support
explaining what happens when polling is wrong therefore is more like investigating someone’s overall health than it is like investigating a murder
pack
polls’ true utility is
in telling us how close the race is
how do we know what hte public wants?
-elections
-callas, letters, social media psots
-sientific opinipon pollling!Representing population preferences with a probability-based sample
* Random Samples versus Convenience Samples
Why is public opinion polling better than other forms of know what the public thinks?
- No selection bias
- Margin of error! (sampling error
consequneces of public opinion polling
Nonresponse!
Question wording (Measurement Error)
Social Desirability Bias
Weighted average error
takes into account the number of polls done by a polling organization.
Voting Could Be the Problem with Democracy (Reiter)
Random selection of representatives?
Allows the average person to participate Reduces campaign and money influence in elections (policy)
Deliberative polling
Direct democracy can force governments to better represent the people - but it doesn’t always work out (Stokes)
Referendums & Initiatives
Influence of special interests & money
Use by autocrats (Putin) Potential depends on context!
Three Stages of Ignorance (Borowitz)
- Ridicule: Dumb politicians pretend to be smart, ignorance not socially accepted
- Acceptance: Politicians pretend to be “regular” or “average”
- Celebration: Smart politicians play dumb
The flow model of political system presented by
David Easton in “An Approach to the Analysis of Political System” (in World Politics,
Classic Liberal Democratic Theory
Democracy as enlightening (and rooted in the enlightenment), committed to individualism, liberty, the rule of law (and equality before the law), a market economy, and limits on government power
- Given the opportunity to self-govern, citizens:
- Engage in politics (political participation)
- Learn about politics and the political system, becoming informed about candidates, political parties, and political issues
- Be tolerant of opposing points of view and accept democratic outcomes even when (especially when) they disagree with the outcome
Sigmund Freud and the Unconscious
implicit bias theories
Walter Lippmann
- Political beliefs as the result of stereotypes (pictures in our head)
freuds view of the human mind
the mental iceberg
Edward Bernays, & Political Propaganda: The Committee on Public Information
- Engineering of consent
- Manipulation of behavior
crowd theory
mob psychology
- Schumpeter
In Defense of Minimal Democracy
- The People’s Choice (1948) & The American Voter (1960)
- Voters largely as uninformed & misinformed
- Little effect of campaigns (or news media) on voter preferences
- Campaigns primarily reinforce vote preferences
The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics - Converse (1964)
- The mass public lacks clear ideological beliefs (even if they identify with an
ideological label
- Beliefs lack constraint (meaning they aren’t correlated)
- Beliefs are unstable across time
Views of the economy depend
more on partisanship than economic indicators!
Guardian (or Elitist) Democratic Theory
Elites are better educated, better socialized into democratic values, and guard the system against the excesses of an uninformed & misinformed public (Madison’s Federalist #10)
- Michels -
The Iron Law of Oligarchy (Christopher Hayes - The Twilight of Elites) - Elites are Inevitab
C Wright Mills -
The Power Elite
Page & Gilens
- Elites Control Policy Decisions
An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957) -
Anthony Downs
V.OKey, Retrospective Voting & the failure of political elites
- “The voters are not fools”
- “If the people can choose only from among rascals, they are certain to choose a rascal”
Limited Information Rationality
- Satisficing versus Optimizing
- Heuristics and Cognitive Shortcuts (Party Affiliation)
- The Miracle of Aggregation (Random versus Nonrandom Error)
Little to no evidence that higher turnout helps the Democratic Party. Turnout rates do not predict election results! Instead, elections are function of underlying partisanship and short-term forces (economic conditions, political scandal/mood, candidates, international events).
Turnout matters but it matters which is side is enthusiastic and mobilized.
Daron Shaw & John Petrocik
Politics occurs through the competition between groups
Pluralism
Competition results in policies that reflect the public interest (e.g., competition between unions and employers).
Pluralism
The public becomes informed about issues they care most about (and that affect them)
Pluralism
- The system is elitist BUT elites are competing and the elite class is permeable (meaning it is not set by birth)
Pluralism
“The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent.” Schattschneider
Pluralism
Does our political system align with what we know about psychology (and choice)?
- Behavioral Economics (Predictably Irrational)
- Policy Nudges and Paternal Libertarianism
- Decoy Effects
- Anchoring
- Dunning Kruger Effect (Overconfidence)
- Framing
Strict Id Laws Don’t Stop Voters BUT stricter voter id laws fix a problem that doesn’t exist. There is also little evidence of systematic voter fraud
Enrico Cantoni & Vincent Pons -
The Meaning of the 2023 Election
- The Meaning of Elections is Constructed
- Off Year Elections (and Reading Tea Leaves)
- Kentucky:
- Andy Beshear for President (?) +5
- Ohio
- Abortion +12
Marijuana
- Virginia
- Glenn Youngkin (15 week state ban)
- Democrats win House, maintain control of the Senate
- Mississippi: Elvis is dead