Political Stability Flashcards
President Hindenburg - election
Ebert died in 1925
first round of votes for new president was inconclusive
right-wing regroup and supported Hindenburg, a new candidate
Thaelman was put up by the KPD as their own candidate as opposed to siding with the other left-wing parties
Thaelman only got 6% of the vote
Hindenburg won by 3%
Hindenburg - political views
- monarchist
- not a republican
- not committed to democracy
- attracted political groups who wanted an authoritarian system
Hindenburg’s oath
Hindenburg took his oath to uphold the Constitution seriously, doing nothing unconstitutional
- he used article 48 but so had Ebert
Hindenburg’s intervention
Hindenburg only intervened over the expropriation of princes’ land
- calls for a referendum on the issue were unconstitutional, and Chancellor Luther agreed
All the elections from 1924 to 1933
May 1924, December 1924, May 1928, September 1930, July 1932, November 1932, March 1933
- 10 new coalition government in this time
Support for the Weimar Republic
In the mid to late 1920s there was a growth of support for pro-Weimar Republic parties
- May 1928: 72.8% of votes for pro-Weimar parties
DNVP - became pro-Weimar in late 1920
Political attitudes - elites
- continued to resent Weimar Republic
- costs of welfare state were disliked by industrialists
- Junkers especially lost influence
- army generals desired a more authoritarians government
- a lot of judges and civil servants wistfully recalled imperial Germany
Political attitudes - opinion formers (e.g. teachers, clergy)
- lack of support for Weimar Republic amongst these people
Political attitudes - middle class
- many middle class professionals, e.g. lawyers, doctors, and smaller industrialists and businessmen tended to be socially conservative
- middle class professionals didn’t benefit from rising real wages, as well as not benefitting from welfare state
- felt left behind the Weimar Republic
Political attitudes - working class
working class made up 40% of the electorate, both urban proletariat and agricultural labourers
- urban proletariat often in trade unions that would fight for their interests, so commonly voted SPD or KPD
- agricultural labourers didn’t tend to vote KPD or SPD
- Some voters voted based on their faith, or for a narrow interest party
Evidence for a more stable democracy
- significantly less violence and insurrections between 1924-29 in comparison to 1919-1923
- growing support for moderate parties - more votes for SPD
- decline in political extremism - shown by DNVP and other parties needing to change political strategy
Evidence for a less stable democracy
- frequent coalitions since politicians were bargaining to stay in power, discrediting parliamentary government
- disconnect between voters and representatives in Reichstag, with voters voting for the party and the party choosing who their representative was
- growth of small, sectional, narrow interest parties
- only 60,000 votes needed for a political party to get a deputy into the Reichstag