Political Parties Flashcards
What can a political spectrum be used for?
Way of seeing different political views in relation to one another
What are left wing part tendencies in terms of policy?
Favours nationalisation of public services, large state intervention in social and economic policy, aiming for greater quality
What are centre tendencies in terms of policy?
Favours less state intervention but some regulation from the government on key policies
What are right wing tendencies in terms of policy?
Favours privitisation of some public services, lessened state intervention in social and economic policy and greater personal autonomy
What are the different ideologies in order from left-> right?
Communism
Socialism
Liberalism (centre)
Conservatism
Fascism
What is the horseshoe theory?
Communism and Facism are most similar (both extremist theories)
What does an Authoritarian rule mean?
government requires strict obedience to the authority of the state
What does a Libertarian rule mean?
rights of the individual are favoured over the state. Some cases government is believed to hinder individuals freedoms
What does Left wing + Libertarian create?
Social Democracy
What is Social Democracy?
Society is a collection of small self regulatory communities that have no state input
What does Left wing + Authoritarian create?
State communism
What is State Communism?
Society is strictly controlled by the government making laws about how people can live
- Economic and fiscal policy controlled by the government
What does Right wing + Authoritarian create?
(traditional Conservatism)
What does traditional Conservatism mean?
Economic and fiscal deregulated to encourage free enterprise
What does Right wing + Libertarian create?
Neo-Liberalism
What are the Left, Centre and Right wing views on economy?
L State economic planning and nationalisation of all major industries
C Largely free market economy with some state regulation
R Strong support for totally free markets.
What are the Left, Centre and Right wing views on the welfare state?
R Limited welfare system targeted at small minority
L Extensive welfare state
C Strong welfare system but targeted at most needy.
What are the Left, Centre and Right wing views on culture and migration?
L Pro multiculturalism
R Anti immigration, asylum seeking and multiculturalism
C Tolerance of minorities
What is a political party?
an organization of people with similar political opinions, which develops a series of goals its seeks to convert into action by obtaining office. It usually pursues these goals by mobilizing public opinion, selecting candidates and competing in elections.
How can parties differ?
- in membership
- in organisation
- in broadness of values
- in aim
How can political parties differ in membership?
Some parties are mass membership, with lots of members (such as the UK Labour Party), others may only have a small leadership group who seek supporters rather than members (such as the main US parties).
How can political parties differ in organisation?
Some parties are highly organised with a formal permanent organisation, such as the German CDU, whilst others are loose, less permanent (like the US).
How can political parties differ in broadness of value?
Some parties have a very narrow range of values and views, and are intensely united around those views, such as Reform UK; others have a broad range of people and their opinions cause them to split into factions, like within the Conservative Party.
How can political parties differ in aim?
Some parties are very focused on gaining power, namely Labour and the Conservatives, whilst others seek merely to influence the political system (the Green Party).
What does a ‘function’ of a political party mean?
What the party does, why they exist and what they do
What are the different functions of political parties?
Making policy
Representation
Selecting candidates
Identifying leaders
Contesting elections
Political education
Reinforcing consent
How does a political party make policy?
Ruling party controls Government, Government is essentially their leadership
- Policy making function of ruling party is same as of the Government, involving political leaders, civil servants, advisory units, committees, private advisors, backbench MPs, members, local activists (BUT mostly made by minister + advisers)
Policy formation function- Aggregation
- Identifying a wide range of demands made on the political system, and converting them into programmes of action
- Undertaken by party leadership, people who will one day become ministers, will put their party policies into practical government
How does an opposition party make policy?
Opposition party, leadership have most influence, membership have a higher influence than in ruling party, through conferences, party committees, community can communicate to leadership, more ideas and demands passed to become policy, occuring at local, regional and national levels
How do political parties represent?
Parties of the 20th century argue they represent national interest, not just of specific classes or groups
- Seek to ensure all groups in society have interests and demands taken to consideration by government, but tend to be prejudiced to a group of society due to core values an ideologies
- Emergence of populist parties
- Rise in Issue Parties
How do Populist parties help representation?
- Tend to emerge and disappear rapidly
- Typically represent people who feel ignored by conventional parties
- Play on people’s fears and dissatisfactions, generally taking root among the poor, who feel left behind
Generally defined by what they are opposed to, often anti-big government, anti taxation, anti big business, anti established policies
How do issue parties help representation?
- Represent particular cause ie Green Party
- Advancing women’s rights in Europe
- Do also claim to represent national interest
How do Political parties select candidates?
Find local councillors, elected mayors, members of devolved assemblies, Welsh and Scottish parliaments, UK parliament
- Done at local and regional levels, through party committees staffed by activists
Local constituency parties have the greatest say, leaders at national levels also have some say
How do political parties identify leaders?
Established party leaders play a main role
Ruling Party:
PM controls appointment of ministers
Opposition Party:
Leader chooses small ‘frontbench’ spokespersons, forming leadership
How can internal party organisations and committees have an impact in identifying party leaders?
Dominance of party leaders, potential leaders have more say in internal party organisations and committees
Formal organisation of opportunities for members to become ‘trained’ as leaders
What are examples of members having a chance to identify party leaders?
2015-16 Labour: Ed Miliband resigned following 2015 election defeat, led to controversy. Party membership overwhelmingly voted to elect Jeremy Corbyn, but his views were far to the left of most Labour MPs and Peers. He was Party Leader until 2020, but many Labour MPs refused to acknowledge him as their leader
Conservative Party lost faith in Theresa May (then leader) in 2019 after failure to unify party to deliver agreed Brexit. Boris Johnson was overwhelmingly favoured by MPs and members (who have power to elect their leader), leading to his appointment of party leader then PM on 24 July 2019.
How were the Lib Dem 2019 + 2020 leadership elections conducted?
Candidates had to be an MP, have support of at least 10% of Lib Dem MPs, support of at least 200 members spread across at least 20 different local parties, ensuring widespread support across the party. Then candidates campaign and are elected by all members of the party on a one member, one vote basis.
System of Alternative Vote, should ensure a majority (2019 + 2020 was a contest between 2 candidates-> 2019: Jo Swinson + Ed Davey, 2020: Layla Moran + Ed Davey (Swinson lost her seat in 2019 general election))
What were the political leanings of the candidates in the 2019+ 2020 Lib Deb leadership elections?
Both contests, choice was between 2 sides of the party-> Ed Davey= more centrist, Orange Book group Lib Dens, Swinson + Moran= more socially liberal + progressive wing of the party
How do political parties contest elections?
Supply approved candidates, publicise election issues, persuade people to vote, inform them about candidates
Effort of PARTY ACTIVISTS, increase voter turnout
Party representatives count the votes, ensure elections are fair and honest
How do parties increase political education?
- Inform people about political issues of the day, explain main areas of conflict and outline their own solutions to the problems they have identified
- Educate the public on how the political system operates, ie Green party raised awareness about environmental issues, UKIP made role and position of the EU a debate, Labour raised awareness of issues of low pay, zero hour contracts, funding ‘bedroom tax’- introduce ideas to the public that may not directly affect all of them
What other groups also influence political education?
Media and Think tanks have increasingly taken this over, supplying information to the public
Also social media growth + internet, marginalised the party
Pressure groups
How do political parties reinforce consent?
Main parties operate + support political system of the UK (Parliamentary democracy), ensure the general population consent to the system
If parties fundamentally challenged the system, would create political conflict in society at large
Parties generally challenging are usually extremist and are only marginal elements in the system
What is the Cash for Honours scandal 2006-7?
- Connection between political donations and life peerage awards
- March 2006: several men nominated for life peerages by Tony Blair were rejected by the House of Lords Appointments Commission, later revealed that they loaned large amounts of money to the Labour Party, at the suggestion of Labour fundraiser Lord Levy
- Resulted in 3 complaints to the Met Police, from those such as SNP MP Angus McNeil and Plaid Cymru leader Elfyn Llwyd
- Led to questioning of various Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem MPs, Lord Levy was arrested and later released on bail
What sources of finance do political parties have?
- Multiple sources of finance (collecting membership subscriptions from members, holding fundraising events like festivals, conferences, dinners. Receiving donations from supporters, raising loans from wealthy individual or banks, self financing of candidates, up to £2 million per party available in grants from Electoral Commission, Money granted to opposition parties in the Commons and Lords
Which parties have better access to funds?
- Larger parties have better access to funds-> Conservatives get donations from wealthy individuals and businesses, Labour gets donations from trade unions (nearly 60% of total party income 2014-15)
How have Labour’s sources of income changed?
Donations from trade unions have drop, made it easier for individual union members to opt out of party contribution, 2017- dropped to over 11% of Labour’s total income
What are sources of income for smaller parties like?
Smaller parties have no regular source of income, smaller memberships
Why do donors donate to smaller parties?
prospects of being in power are minimal, donors act out of idealism rather than prospects of gaining influence
What did the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000) change to funding laws?
people not on the UK electoral roll couldn’t make the donations, Limits were places on how much could be spent on parliamentary elections, donations over £500 had to be declared, donations over £7500 had to be placed on electoral register
What does regulation on funding aim for?
Transparency rather than serious limits
What did the 2009 Political Parties and Elections Act do?
gave electoral commission to power to investigate and impose finances, restricted donations from non UK residents + tighter regulations in the election run up
Why is the current funding system controversial in terms of party size?
Funding favours the two main parties, putting smaller parties at great disadvantage in elections, creating political inequality
Why is the current funding system controversial in terms of donor influence?
- Funding by large donors represents hidden + unaccountable form of political influence Parties can’t change specific policies or propose legislation as a direct result of donations, but donors may expect political return for their investment
- Funding could be corrupt (morally and legally). Donor may expect honours from party leaders like peerage or knighthood (CASH FOR HONOURS). Cannot be proven, was investigated between 2006-7
Why is the current funding system controversial in terms of decreasing party membership?
Steady decline of party membership means they are more reliant upon donors, furthering possibility of corruption + purchase of political influence
What are examples of large donations which have helped further embed the 2 party system in the UK? (from
Electoral commission reported examples
- 2015-17: Conservative party received £11.3 million from prominent figures and companies in financial sector
Received £3.6 million from property companies
Hedge fund proprietor Angus Fraser donated £1,137,400 to
- Early 2017: Unite trade union £657,702 to the Labour Party early in 2017
UNISON (public service union), donated £376,242 to Labour
Why are individual donations controversial?
Individual donations can be seen as undemocratic, can carry controversy
Why are trade union donations controversial?
Donation through trade union can be criticised as members of unions are not given clear choices
So much income comes from trade unions to Labour, they may have an influence on them
What are negatives of changing the current party funding system?
- Costs government lots of money than they already currently spend
- Gives more money to certain parties that may not represent British Interests
- Can still make donations to individuals in the party- may not decrease corruption
- Not in agreement as how to impose state party funding
- Decreases reliance on large donors, parties may stop representing their interests
- Decreases political participation
- May enforce 2 part system- ie ‘par per voter scheme
- Tax payers end up funding a party they don’t agree with
What did the Phillips report 2007 suggest on Party funding reforms?
- Suggested state party funding based on vote share or membership size, making party politics more fair and democratic in the UK
What are alternative party funding schemes?
- Impose restrictions on size of individual donations to parties-> cap would have to be low to be effective
- Impose tight restrictions on how much parties are allowed to spend. Make large scale funding futile
- Restrict donations to individuals ie outlaw donations from businesses, pressure groups and trade unions
- Replace all funding with state grant for parties, paid for out of general taxation.
What are the issues with the alternative party funding schemes?
No agreement on which solution
What are some examples of party funding controversies
Ecclestone
Cash for Questions 1996
Cash for Honours
What are positives of tax payers funding political parties
- Reduce corruption, makes parties more democratic
- Favours smaller parties
What are negatives of tax payers funding political parties?
- Trade unions provide around 3/4 funding for Labour
- Major business backers to Conservatives, have influence on policies
- Tax payers may feel forced to fund a political party they don’t support
How does declining party membership increase the corruption of party funding?
- Look for funding from wealthy individuals
ie Ecclestone + Blair-> F1 would be exempt from tobacco advertising ban, Linked to £1 million donation-> donations can alter public policy at expense of the public interest
How can state funding decrease reliance on groups + individuals?
Currently more prevalant now memberships are decreasing, conditions exist for wealthy donors to have influence
- Less time finding funding, more time refining policy-> ie Conservatives auctioned Shoe shopping with Theresa may, Tea with Boris Johnson
- Opportunities for donors to talk with MPs about policy, have influence, access to decision makers
- State funding would eliminate ‘pay to play’
How can state funding allow parties to ignore important stakeholders like trade unions + business owners as they no longer take money from them?
Politicians can become isolated to real world issues if they are denied access to interest groups, when they seek financial and electoral support
What is the evidence to show the dominance of the 2 major parties (Labour and Conservative)?
Could help smaller parties + break dominance
2017 election- showed 2 major parties benefitting most in the system
April to June 2017- more than half of all donations given to Conservative Party, around £25 million for Conservatives, £9 million from Labour, from small group of wealthy donors
JCB= high donor, linked to Conservative Party
Women’s Equality party= £300,000
What does the current party funding system negatively impact smaller parties?
Smaller parties forced to rely on loans, decreases their long term liability, ensuring a 2 party dominance + giving voters less people to choose to vote from
How can state funding be biased towards existing parties, enforcing the 2 party dominance?
- 2007 Phillips report recommended ‘pence per voter’-> only benefits 2 man parties who received the sost votes
- Penalises groups that have votes but lose due to FPTP system if the funding is from electoral system-> Ie vote share, seat share both supports Labour and Conservative, cannot break 2 party dominance
How are the existing laws for party funding week, showing state funding would be more viable?
Cash for questions John Major-> cash from Al Fayed to ask questions in the Commons
Political parties elections and referendums act-> requires transparency, only 568 people donated £14 million in 2016 to political parties
What are examples of state funding already existing, with better laws than current party funding laws, showing state funding is a better option?
Cranbourne money-> funds paid to opposition parties in the Lords to cover administrative costs
Short money-> funds paid to opposition parties that win seats in the Commons
Vital to help support the work of Opposition to hold the government to account
Laws are weak, points to leading state funding and political parties, existing state funding works efficiently and is important
What are examples of already existing laws on party finance that already work, showing there is no need for state party funding?
- Committee for standards of public life post Cash for Questions scandal:
If there is a response after scandals, there is no need for precautionary measures of state party funding
Expenses scandal-> recall act 2015, constituents can sack their MPs for financial wrong doing
- Seen in 2019, 1 Labour MP and 1 Conservative MP recalled
What impact does parties having to state where their funding comes from have?
- Provide voters with transparency
- Political parties, elections and referendums act- overall limits to elections and referendums spending on campaigns
- 2009- imposed tighter regulations on spending in the run up to elections
Why should a tax payer fund a party they don’t agree with?
It you have to pay for a democracy, it need rules and regulations for it to work
- Getting a fair share of payment, that is not corrupt, leaving them less reliant on wealthy elite packers, it focuses policy on the people and not corruption, giving donors an upper hand in influencing policy
Why shouldn’t a tax payer fund a party (State funding) they don’t agree with?
Could reinforce the 2 party system and make them less responsive to real world issues from main backers
What is Conservatism?
· Conservatism is hard to define, as there is no one definite body of ideas that all conservatives follow.
· The idea of conservatism is older than the left-right definition. Conservatives seek to defend the prevailing social order or reinstate a past order, whatever that may be.
· Conservatives are anti-utopian and have a sceptical attitude towards human nature and morality.
What is the History of Conservatism?
· Idea of the importance of preserving status quo dates back to 14th Century
· Began to be used in a political sense in the 18th century - French Revolution.
· European fascism, i.e. the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini, drew on existing anti-modernist conservatism and anti-communism. But most traditionalist conservatives disliked mass fascist movements and the personality cult around the leader.
· Modern British Conservative party founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1840s.
Who was Edmund Burke?
regarded founder of the Western conservative tradition.