political authority under Nicholas 2nd Flashcards
lenin’s april thesis
1)Russia should immediately pull out of the war
2)No cooperation with the provisional government, a second revolution should giver power to the workers
3)Land to be shared amongst peasantry
4)Workers to take control of factories
5)The Soviet should take power
-populist slogans e.g. ‘Peace, Land, Bread’ attracted soldiers, peasants and workers
soviet order no.1
-issued 1/03/1917, said that soldiers and workers should only obey the provisional government if it did not conflict with soviet orders
kornilov coup
-August 1917
-Kerensky attempted to assert control over events and inserted Kornilov as Commander in Chief to reassert discipline, too reactionary for the left
-Kornilov moved to supress unrest (strikes) in Petrograd, but at the last minute Kerensky called for his arrest and had to call on the soviet to help defend the city in an attempted ‘coup’ by Kornilov
-Kerensky blamed for this, so support for the Bolsheviks inceased
july days
-Kronstadt mutiny under Bolshevik slogans e.g. ‘All power to the Soviets’, and marched into Petrograd
-middle-ranking Bolsheviks happy to encourage, leaders refused to endorse
-Provisional government crushed this with support from Mensheviks and SRs
-discredited Bolsheviks, Kamenev and Trotsky arrested, Lenin fled to Finland
june offensive
-Kerensky planned military offensive against aystro-germans
-believed a victory would rally the russians behind the provisional government and force the enemy to make peace
-initially successful, soldiers then refused to leave their trenches and fight
petrograd soviet
-set up by mensheviks Feb 1917
-workers from each factory elected to represent them,each city elected soviet chairman,gave this more credibility than PG
-provisional gov. forced to work with them, as PS had control of workers,soldiers,railway,industry,and communications (dual power)
-soldiers soon joined in fear of being accused of mutiny
failures of provisional government
-decided to continue with war, believed it could break germany with an offensive
-lack of authority meant issues caused by war couldn’t be solved
-promise of elections delayed by Kerensky, creating Constituent Assembly
-land reform not created
-government unable to control peasant revolts
febuary revolution and abdication of tsar
-14/02:100,000 strike in Petrograd
-23-24/02:International Women’s Day march,200,000 workers end up on strike,tsarist statues overturned
-25/02:half workforce of capital on strike,Petrograd at standstill,escalation of violence
-26/02:telegram sent to tsar,informing of anarchy,Duma shut
-27/02:mutiny begins(army no longer on side)Petrograd Soviet set up,intend to takeover gov.
-28/02:N2 tries to come back to Petrograd but is diverted by revolutionaries
-02/03:Nicholas 2nd abdicates
how economic problems increased discontent with tsar
-sale of vodka prohibited, people distilled their own causing a loss in revenue
-riots against price controls on goods and inflation
-workers strikes increased as wages fell to 1/4 of pre-war levels by 1917
-rationing announced, brought violent exchanges with the police
-losses/injuries in the military had a knock on effect on mainly the agricultural economy
how military incidents increased discontent with tsar
-heavy losses against Germany in Battle of Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes,Germany was an industrial power and the mainly agricultural Russia could not compete,failure on Russia’s part, to modernise (repeat of Crimean War 1855)
-defeats in Galacia
-pushed back by Germans in 1915-16
-military leadership poor, despite 1000% growth in artillery and rifles, supplies did not reach all and there was no war plan either
how nicholas’ actions increased discontent with him
-took the role of Commander in Chief from Sept 1915,stationed on frontlines,despite lack of experience so was reponsible for disasters,when in 1914 he had never been so popular
-Rasputin took charge (nepotism), employing 4 PMs,3 foreign secretaries, and 6 interior ministers (in charge of food) cased chaos,inconsistency, and confusion, nobility began a plot to remove him
-rumours of Alexandra being a spy
how government handling of the war increased discontent towards the tsar
-before war, the government set up ‘military zones’ (supressed civilians) as the government was unsympathetic to the people
-‘union of zemstva’ provided medical needs which the state neglected
-zemgor became a liberal organisation against the government’s war organisation
-duma deputies formed into a ‘progressive bloc’ demanding that the tsar change his ministers, which he refused to do
russia and ww1
-Nicholas launched rearmament programme 1913, army increased by 500,000 soldiers and 11,800 officers
-largest army in the world
-but, poor roads and railway, unfit soldiers (mainly peasants), industrial resources not prepared
-Nicholas decided for Russia to help Serbia and join in war against the triple alliance
evidence of tsar’s political authority being weak by 1914
-strikes regarded as political in nature increased 24 in 1911 to 2,401 by 1914
-nobility began to question autocracy
-duma experiment failed to bring about any fundamental change to the conduct of government which caused many to become disillusioned
-increase in nationalist tendencies for areas such as Ukraine
-acute restlessness and discontent amongst industrial workers, after lena goldfields in 1912, wave of violent strikes followed
-autocracy had been weakened by the duma and zemstva as these allowed for policy debate
evidence of tsar’s political authority being strong by 1914
-army remained loyal, and crushed civil disturbances
-article 87 meant the tsar could rule by decree
-autocracy recovered well from the 1905 revolution and stolypin restored order in the countryside
-liberal middle class feared the masses and did not want to see revolution
-Stolypin’s use of the Ohkrana decimated revolutionary parties
Stolypin’s changes to Duma
-advised the tsar to dissolve the second duma and then changed the weight of votes to be more in support of the tsar and to decrease the influence of revolutionary/radical parties, creating a more conservative electorate
-decree on 3rd June (change to elections) denounced as ‘Stolypin’s coup’ and an infringement of the fundamental laws, even the octobrists were uncomfortable with it