POLI 244 final Flashcards
how did the world become dominated by sovereign states?
- war waging advantage
- law enforcement
- smaller states group together
what are the levels of analysis in IR
the three images of IR
third image: the international level, representatives of states with different interests interact with one another, sometimes through international institutions
second image: state or transnational level, groups whose members span borders – such as multinational corporations, transnational advocacy networks, terrorist organizations – pursue their interests by trying to influence both domestic and international politics.
first image: domestic level, subnational actors with different interests – politicians, bureaucrats, business
and labour groups, voters – interact within domestic institutions to determine the country’s foreign policy choices
overview of realism
- assumes that the state is the dominant actor and world politics is characterised by anarchy
- states are rational, seeking to maximise security and power (power=security)
- state’s interests generally conflict
internally they want to build up their military as this = strength
externally they may form limited cooperaiton alliances and go to war
how does realism view interactions
international politics is mostly about bargaining and coercion always remains a possibility
how does realism view institutions
- the international system is anarchic and institutions exert little independent effect
- international institutions reflect the interests of powerful states
overview of liberalism
- many types of different actors are important and no single interest dominates
- wealth is a common goal for many actors
- actors often have common interests which serves as the basis for cooperation
how does liberalism view interactions between states?
- cooperation is possible and likely
- conflict is not only inevitable but occurs when actors fail to recognise or act on common interests
how does liberalism view institutions
- they facilitate cooperation by setting out rules, providing information and creating procedures for collective decision making
- deomocratic political institutions make international politics more likely to reflect the common interest of individuals
overview of constructivism
- many different types of actors are important
- actors interests are influenced by culture, identity and prevailing ideas
- their choices often reflect norms of appropiate behaviour rather than interests
one prominent strand of constructivist though emphasises the role of norms
- because ideas of appropiate behaviour change they see significant potential for change in world politics
how does constructivism view interactions
- interactions socialise actors to hold particular interests but transformations can occur caused by alternative understandings of those interests
how does constructivism view institutions
international institutions define identities and shape actions through norms of appropiate behaviour
what is neorealism (structural realism)
- constant anarchy makes war possible
- power is the measure of a state’s survivability
- international politics can be explained through polarity (materialism)
- leads to security dilemma
in contrast to classical realisms focus on human nature, neorealism highlights anarchy and the relative distribution of power among states as structural causes for a competition on security
what are the two opposing views on how the structure of the international system is made up
neorealism: material capabilities
constructivism: social relations
what is power?
the capabilities or power resources at one’s disposal that can be used to influence outcomes
what is hard power and how is it pursued
getting others to do what you want regardless of what they want
- military power including defense, deterrence, compellence or increasing prestige
- economic power
what is soft power
getting others to want the outcomes that you want
power over preference
what are the four ways of management of international security?
- balance of power systems
- concerts
- collective security
- security communities
how does balance of power manage international security?
- aims to stop any single state from dominating the international system
- functions through shifting alliances and countering the rise of a hegemon
- e.g. 19th century europe where britain, france and russia aligned to check potential dominance
how do concerts manage international security
- where major powers cooperate to maintain order without formal institutions
- they rely on consensus among great powers to address crises and manage disputes
- fosters a sense of collective responsibility to prioritise diplomacy and negotiation over conflict
- e.g. the concert of europe, early to mid 19th century that satbilised europe post-napoleonic wars
how do security communities manage international security?
- groups of states that share norms, values and institutions so would not consider war
- integration, trust and cooperation are emphasised over competition
- e.g. NATO or the EU where states resolve disputes without fear of military escalation
what is rational choice theory?
- international politics is the outcome of individual goal-seeking decisions
- who are the relevant actors, what goals do they pursue, how constrained is their ability to do so
- the goal is irrelevant, this is not the rational aspect of the theory, the action is only rational in light of a given goal
how does rational choice theory work?
- consider all possible strategies
- predict expected outcomes of all courses of action (rank-order outcomes)
- select the best strategy based on an actors’ interest in outcome
what are the 3 most general interests of a state
- power/security
- economic/material
- ideological
what are the two ways in which states interact?
cooperation and bargaining