PM + Executive Flashcards
what is the definition of executive?
The collective group of Prime Minister, cabinet, junior ministers this is known as the government
What is the definition of cabinet?
The prime minister and senior ministers who lead a particular government department
what is the definition of minister?
An MP a member of the HOL appointed to a position in the government, usually exercising specific responsibilities in a department
What is the definition of government department?
A part of the executive, usually with specific responsibility, open areas, such as education, health or defence
what is the definition of royal prerogative?
A set of powers and privileges belonging to the monarch, but nine millie exercised by the prime minister of cabinet, such as granting of honours are legal pardon
what is the definition of secondary legislation?
Powers given to the executive by parliament to make changes to the law within certain specific rules
what is the definition of individual responsibility?
The principle, by which ministers are responsible for their personal conduct and for their departments
what is the definition of collective responsibility?
Principal, by which ministers must support the cabinet decisions or leave the executive
what is the definition of presidential government?
An executive dominated by one individual this may be a president, but it also used to describe a strong dominant prime minister
executive execute laws passed by the legislature. Therefore, they are responsible for making policy, managing budgets, controlling Parliamentary agenda.
executive in the UK is the dominant branch, but due to Parliamentary sovereignty this means the executive must answer to Parliament and seek approval for its actions. This approval from Parliament is easier if a prime minister has a large majority of MPs in the HOC due to the FPTP
1997 labour majority of 408 seats this is 243 more than the Conservatives
2019 Conservative majority of 365 seat. This is 163 more than labour.
Structure of the executive?
The prime minister is the head of the executive
Cabinet members are appointed by the prime minister. These include MPs and peers of governing party and they are heads of government departments.
There are 120 ministers of state and Parliamentary undersecretaries these are MPs of junior ministers
Civil servants and appointed government officials are known as SPADS.
Roles of the executive?
PM?
Cabinet?
PM
—-
they have the power of patronage as they can form gov
they have the power to propose directory policy.
They manage the cabinet by chairing meetings and setting up cabinet committees.
They organise government by creating new government departments and are responsible for the civil service.
They control Parliament as they are the leader of the largest party therefore has control of the majority of Parliament a gender and uses power of secondary legislation from Parliamentary act to make policy changes without Parliament approval e.g. adjusting minimum wage 
The media focus on the prime minister is more than the cabinet. There also directly elected MP and has been elected as party leader by the membership, giving them more authority.
Cabinet
———
The civil service makes policy ideas and decisions and is not supposed to serve a political purpose They work to support ministers not the party therefore not partisan.
There has been a growth in special advisors known as spads these people are employed as civil servants and I’m not elected, but had the role of giving political advice to a minister in a way. The neutral civil service will not. Therefore they are partisan.
Fiona Hill and Nick Timothy were spads to Theresa May and had a major role in advising her when formulating the Conservative election strategy and creating Conservative manifesto promises in 2017 however May forced them to resign after the Conservative lack of victory in 2017.
Dominic Cummings was employed as a chief of staff to Johnson and Led the 2019 election campaign
What are the different roles and powers of the executive?
Role - proposing legislation, proposing a budget, making policy decisions
Power - Royal prerogative, proposing legislation, secondary legislation
What is IMR?
individual ministers have responsibility for their department, therefore are responsible for their conduct as a minister. This is known as ministerial code.
ministers must be accountable to Parliament for their policies made by their department. They do this by answering questions in the house integration by select committees. This is the legal aspect of the principle.
serious errors by ministers are usually followed by resignation
Serious errors by the ministers department, usually results in the minister resigning. All ministers behaviour is measured against the ministerial code of conduct. If they failed to meet the code ministers police dismissal by the prime minister. This is a political aspect of the principle.
Individual ministerial responsibility is important as it holds MPs to account ensuring greater legitimacy as ministers can’t mislead Parliament this helps to maintain power of Parliament keeping it sovereign. In addition checks on ministers behaviours, ensure they represent the government with honesty and integrity.
Examples of IMR?
Priti Patel, Department of International Development 2017 - someone from an international meeting in Rwanda as she misled the prime minister of a holding party on official meetings with Israeli Ministers business officials and lobbyist. She was forced to resign by Theresa May.
This is important as she was held accountable for her behaviour as she was not honest with the government about her meetings and therefore fell below the ministerial code of conduct and her unprofessional behaviour in unofficial meetings.
Amber Rudd Home Office 2017 - she misled the house about home office targets by deportation. It was uncovered in the home affairs select committee hearing. She denied knowing about these targets for emails revealed. She was aware she was forced to resign.
This is important because it holds ministers to account for her departments mistake
Gavin Williamson, Education Secretary 2020 - he made several U-turns as his time as education secretary on free school meals, Covid closure on schools and technology not delivered to low income students. He did not resign and Boris Johnson never asked for his resignation as it was alleged that Williamson knew details about Boris Johnson, that could be politically damaging when he was a party whip.
This is an important as individual ministerial responsibility is dependent on the power of the prime minister as he can choose not to uphold the principle.
suella Braverman Home Secretary 2022 - she sent emails related to her immigration from her personal email to an MP and accidental member of public Lizz Truss Demanded her resignation which Braverman accepted in her resignation letter she accepted her mistake and resigned.
This is important as she broke the ministerial code of conduct and therefore resigned, however, it could be argued that Truss used the incident as an excuse to remove Suella Braverman from her cabinet, knowing that due to divisions in the party, especially after the mini budget. She needed to appeal to a broarder arm of the Tory party.
November 2020 The home secretary, Priti Patel, avoided the sack despite a Cabinet Office inquiry reportedly uncovering evidence of bullying within the Home Office. The inquiry concluded that Patel broke the ministerial code of conduct, but the prime minister, Boris Johnson, ignored the findings and ruled that she did not break the code. As a result, she did not lose her position.
Nadhim Zahawi has been sacked as Tory party chairman after an ethics inquiry into the handling of his tax affairs found a “serious breach” of the ministerial code. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said it was “clear that there has been a serious breach of the ministerial code”, but Mr Zahawi made no apology for his actions and attacked the conduct of the media.
Has IMR weakened
NO IMR has not weakened as ministers must be accountable to parliament for the policies made by their department, answering questions in the house, or being interrogated by select committees (Amber Rudd) however, this was a rare event as many ministers apologise for mistakes, but rarely resign
No IMR has not weakened as No, I am Hassal weekend serious errors by ministers are usually followed by resignation, for example, Suella Braverman
No IMR has not weakened as serious errors by the ministers department, usually results in the minister resigning
No IMR has not weakened as All ministers behaviour is measured against the ministerial code of conduct. If they fail to meet the code ministers faced dismissal by the prime minister. This relates to more personal conduct and where the conduct has falle Short ministers have been quick to resign are being made to resign by the prime minister, for example, Priti Patel
yes IMR has weakened as there is no specific rule that says Parliament can ensure a minister resignation. They can criticise them usually through select committees are drawing debate in the house and called for their resignation, but this is usually the responsibility of the prime minister.
What is CMR?
What is the 5 principles of CMR?
Why is CMR important?
What are the 3 exceptions to CMR?
The PM has their own preogeative powers but decitions are taken collectively by the executive as a whole. This means all ministers Junior and senior are responsible and will defend all executive policies and decitions.
5 main principles:
1. Ministers are collectively responsible for all government policies.
2. All ministers must publicly support all gov policies even if they privately disagree.
3.if ministers want to dissent publicly from a gov policy they are expected to resign as a minister first.
4.if a minister dissents without resigning they can expect to be dismissed by the PM
5. As cabinet meetings are secret any dissent within gov is concealed from others MPS and the public.
CMR supports the PM power a nod authority if they are confident they will not experience the dissent from their ministers.
The PM can also rely on the votes of the executive and can be certain of around 120 votes for the bill in the HOC from the executive this is known as the payroll vote.
Supporters argue that the principle ensures ministers can express concern in private knowing their disagreement is unlikely to be publicized how ever critics argue that the principle prevents ministers from criticizing the executive and prevents them from expressing their opinions.
- Coalition 2010-2015 - some areas of policy were included in the coalition Agreement which meant ministers from both parties would be required under the principle to agree. However issues like Trident Nuclear Submarine Missile System was excluded form the agreement and ministers could disagree publicly with the gov on issues.
- EU Referendum 2016 - During the campaign minister were allowed to make their own minds up on the issue going against the principle of CMR the Justice Secretory at the time Michael Gove, former leader of the HOC Chris Grayling, both openly campaigned against the governments official position of remaining in the EU.
- Mays conservative Campaign 2017-2019 - Not official suspension of the principle but weak leadership from May meant that several ministers openly criticised her BREXIT deal. May didn’t fire these ministers as she was trying to ensure cooperation and find a compromise between two sides of the Conservative Party who wanted very different versions of Brexit. Firing them may have meant that she would lose their support in the HOC which she couldn’t afford to do this is important as it shows the principle of CMR may rely on the power of the PM than having any significance of their own.
Examples of CMR?
Robin Cook Iraq War 2003 - senior Labour Minister disagreed with the devotion to go to war with Iraq without first seeking a new resolution from the UN Security Council.
Gavin Williamson - was education secretary in 2020 he repealed u turns over issues like free school meals, Covid school closures, and failure to provide tech to low income house holds there was speculation that he knew about BJ problematic issues therefore the PM was unable to dismiss him.
Lord Frost was a cabinet member responsible for Brexit and was previously a SPAD for BJ he was given peerage to sit in cabinet however resigned in 2021 because of plan B Covid restrictions in his letter he said we should live with Covid
David Davis was secretory state of justice for exiting the EU during Brexit campaign for leave when TM announced Chequers Plan he decided to resign.
Evaluate the view that the conventions of IMR and CMR are both important?
The PM and cabinet
Two main factors between the relationship of PM and cabinet are power and leadership of the prime minister and authority of the cabinet to influence the prime minister
The prime minister has one of the two relationships with the cabinet:
- they use the cabinet as a sounding board for decisions and listen to ministers feedback working more collaboratively as Major, Cameron and May did.
- They have a little time for cabinet discussions, preferring a more presidential style, leadership as Thatcher and Blair did.
Factors affecting the PM choice of Cabinet
Allies - brown and Blair were both elected in 1983 and shared an office, Cameron and Osborne were university friends, Truss only appointed those who supported her leadership campaign in 2022.
Big beasts - these MPs have a significant following of MPs in the party so MPs may feel they have to appoint them to avoid potential criticism or rebellion from the back benches eg. May had Hammond and Johnson in her cabinet, Sunak has Michael Gove.
Experience - Sunak’s position as chancellor during Covid, highlighted his ability to handling an unprecedented economic crisis.
Party fractions - Sunak brought Braverman back at home secretary, despite her for signing for breaching the ministerial code under Truss as she’s a member of the ERG fraction, mays cabinet was a balance of leavers and remainers
Rivals - bind them by collective responsibility, so they cannot easily criticise the government Johnson’s choice of Sajid Javid as Health Secretary
Descriptive representation - trust his Cabinet was the first where all the great offices of state were not filled by white men Chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, Foreign Secretary, James cleverly however, Sunak was far less diverse as 45% attended private school and only 22% more women when he first appointed in October 2022
Factors affecting the relationship between the prime minister and Cabinet
Up to 1960s the relationship between prime minister and Cabinet was regarded as a Cabinet system of government as they were the dominant member of the cabinet but not able to control the cabinet entirely.
And from 1960 to 2010. The prime minister dominated the relationship in a prime ministerial system of government. This is also known as a presidential style leadership.
During this period, individual ministers were powerful, but cabinet as a whole was not very powerful Wilson, Thatcher and Blair were dominant in the relationship between cabinet and Prime Minister
Blair developed sofa politics whereby he would meet Cabinet members in private with advisers to agree on policy, which would then be presented as final decisions in Cabinet meetings effectively removing the power of the cabinet to scrutinise his decision. He also tend to rely more on his SPADS than elected cabinet members.
Why are prime minister regarded as more powerful than the cabinet?
Spatial leadership - Prime Minister’s will attempt to be standalone figures establishing ideological positions distinct from the party. For example, Thatcherism, Blairism
Prime Minister’s often speak for the nation on major events. For example, Johnson conducted almost daily Covid briefings. He also delegate to the cabinet and who should speak
Election campaigns focus on the individual, new labour, largely focused on Blair, 2019 police Johnson at the centre with his Brexit deal, the media increasingly focused heavily on party leaders in their coverage, 2023 Sunak campaigning as a leader for change
Personal mandate - the mandate for a government after a successful General election is often attributed to the prime minister, e.g. 2019, 1997, 1983 1979
Increased use of SPADS - Prime Minister, increasingly trust their personal handpicked advises over the civil servants
Cabinet office- increase power to this office that now works to coordinate Whitehall on behalf of the prime minister e.g. civil service work and ministers department
From 2010 to 2017, the cabinet had a more powerful role in the relationship. Give examples
Cameron kept a close circle of MPs in the cabinet including deputy leader, Nick Clegg, who were involved in most decision, making process the Cabinet was important again during this period, as it was responsible for resolving disputes between the coalition partners, and presenting policy in a way that seem to unified this period was seen as a revival of a strong cabinet
From 2016 to 2017 May attempted over 10 to the dominance of the prime minister for weak leadership and small majority that she also heavily relied on the cooperation and support of the cabinet members. First ability ministers were part of her downfall e.g. Chris Grayling resigned over her Brexit deal .