Plato and Aristotle

Question 1

Introduction:

Answer 1

Define
Implication/context
Scholar
Conclude

Question 2

Define: The Form of the Good

Answer 2

a concept in the philosophy of Plato.
The definition of the Good is a perfect, eternal, and changeless Form, existing outside space and time.
It is a Platonic ideal

Question 3

Define:Forms

Answer 3

A name Plato gives to ideal concepts

Question 4

Define: Reason

Answer 4

Using logical steps and though processes in order to reach conclusions

Question 5

Define: Rationalist

Answer 5

Someone who thinks that the primary source of knowledge is reason

Question 6

Define: Empiricist

Answer 6

Someone who thinks that the primary source of knowledge is experience gained through the five senses

Question 7

Define: Prime mover

Answer 7

Aristotle’s concept of the ultimate cause of movement and change in the universe

Question 8

Define: Socratic method

Answer 8

The method of philosophical reasoning and questioning

Question 9

Define: Analogy

Answer 9

A comparison between one thing and another in an attempt to clarify meaning

Question 10

Define: Transcendent

Answer 10

Being beyond this world and outside the realms of ordinary experience

Question 11

Define: Dualism

Answer 11

The belief that reality can be divided into two distinct parts - good/evil physical/non-physical

Question 12

Define: Aeiton

Answer 12

An explanatory factor/ reason or cause for something

Question 13

Define: Telos

Answer 13

The end/ final purpose

Question 14

Define: Theist

Answer 14

Someone who believes in Gods

Question 15

Implication: What were they trying to disprove

Answer 15

Heraclitus’ statement you cannot step in the same river twice as everything is in a state of ‘flux’ thus true knowledge can never be obtained.

Question 16

Plato

Answer 16

-The Republic
-A priori
-Rational
concluded with the forms = a perfect eternal realm where FofTG illuminates and gives power to all the Forms

Question 17

Aristotle

Answer 17

-Empiricist
-A posteriori
if we understand the causal mechanism responsible for change we can gain true knowledge from experience
Prime Mover reason for change in reality, as we are all moving towards our final purpose through the Four causes.

Question 18

Conclusion

Answer 18

What stance

Question 19

Who was Plato influenced by

Answer 19

Socrates who believed that must look beyond the surface and ask questions about the physical world

Question 20

The forms point statement

Answer 20

The forms are an eternal transcendent realm created by a God called the Demiurge where perfect concepts such as beauty and justice exist

Question 21

The Forms explain

Answer 21

This world everything is imperfect as it is in a flux of change i.e. a tree is in a constant state of decay
-Have knowledge of perfect concepts of perfect circles etc.
-Use rational - must be a perfect immutable realm where these perfect concepts exist
-Have knowledge as souls were there before we were born

Question 22

First strength of Forms

Answer 22

-Rational
-Uses observations of our knowledge of perfect concepts i.e. beauty and justice
- cannot exist in a world that is constantly changing so must be an eternal realm beyond this one which we once had access too

Question 23

Counter to the Forms

Answer 23

Justice and beauty are subjective. And are more like matters of opinion rather than fact.
-One person may find a graveyard beautiful all the other person sees is death

Question 24

Second counter to the Forms

Answer 24

Inductive leap of logic to go from observation that things change to the World of the Forms

Question 25

Evaluate the Forms criticisms

Answer 25

Reasonable arguments as it is clear that when Forms are pushed to logical extremes they lack coherency i.e. would there be a Form of the Bogey - Plato fails to address also how subjective ideas would be a form especially as abstract concepts such as beauty need something corresponding with it to have meaning

Question 26

Link the Forms back to the question

Answer 26

Arguably this suggests... It is logical to thus assume...

Question 27

Point: The Form of the Good

Answer 27

The Forms are arranged in a hierarchy and the Form of the Good is at the top Beneath are abstract concepts such as beauty and justice and beneath that are particulars (objects) such as a tree, cat -Allows us to see as it illuminates all the other forms

Question 28

Explain: The Form of the Good

Answer 28

Cave analogy people are chained to looking at shadows on the wall, thinking that the shadows were reality. Yet when one prisoner broke free and looked outside they were able to see the truth and all the Forms, from the sun , which was the FofTG

Question 29

Evaluate The Form of the Good

Answer 29

logical to assume that the Forms are arranged in this order, as each human is striving towards good and intrinsically we are always working towards the most moral solution.

Question 30

Counter to the Form of the Good

Answer 30

Aristotle ‘good’ is subjective and spoken about in many ways and cannot be confined to one area ie. the good in military strategy is how to efficiently kill people, whereas the good in medicine is how to keep people alive – there cannot be one unified form of goodness

Question 31

Evaluate criticism to the Form of the Good

Answer 31

-Logical assertion to make as Plato is using good to define a Form without understanding that good can mean many things and cannot be confined to one category

Question 32

Link Form of Good back to question

Answer 32

Plato’s theory does not make sense

Question 33

Quick link from Plato to Aristotle

Answer 33

common reaction to Plato’s theory of the Forms is that it lacks empirical evidence, however Plato could respond that it it’s good his theory has no evidence because evidence cannot be trusted as it is merely shadows of the real world of forms that only a priori reason can discover -To better criticise Plato requires showing that he is wrong to reject evidence. One way of doing that is by showing how empiricism succeeds, by showing that knowledge can successfully be derived from experience

Question 34

The Four causes

Answer 34

Things change from Actuality (current state) to potentially (what it could become if certain conditions are met) which then when this change has occurred the potentially will be actuality This is due to its directional change via the four causes

Question 35

Explain the four causes

Answer 35

explained via an analogy of a statue: Material cause (bronze) ; formal cause (shape) ; efficient cause (the Statue maker) ; final cause ( used to pray to the Gods). This final cause is called the telos and what everything is working towards, which causes change and movement

Question 36

Evaluate strengths of four causes

Answer 36

-Strong -Empirical observations derived from evidence -Can clearly see thing change in this way

Question 37

Sartre criticism of the four causes

Answer 37

‘existence precedes essence’ humans exist before they have a defined purpose and so have to subjectively define their purpose for themselves.

Question 38

Evaluate Sartre's criticism

Answer 38

This is a psychological argument stating how people cling towards having a purpose or a telos as they are scared about not having a final purpose at all and the intensity of the freedom that comes with that precept.

Question 39

Counter to Sartre

Answer 39

whilst Sartre raises a valuable point the argument is psychological, he does not provide metaphysical grounds for rejecting telos and so is arguably committing the genetic fallacy. The genetic fallacy is assuming that the way in which someone comes up with a theory is relevant to whether it is true or false. Just because people have a psychological need to believe in objective purpose, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

Question 40

Evaluation of counter to Sartre

Answer 40

unsuccessful because it is a misunderstanding of his argument. Sartre’s starting premise is that there is nothing in our experience of our own mind which suggests we have a telos, and that we all experience ‘radical freedom’ – this is kind of empirical like Aristotle but a different conclusion.

Question 41

Link four causes back to question

Answer 41

Using Ockam’s razor this is more rational than everything having a purpose as there is no empirical evidence to suggest such a thing even exists, from observing the contingent nature of the world.

Question 42

Point of prime mover

Answer 42

If we take Aristotle's hypothesis that the world is moving from potentiality to actuality via the four causes. must be something that actualises the potential in everything else which Aristotle calls the prime mover

Question 43

Explain prime mover

Answer 43

constant state of change of cause and effect does not provide satisfactory explanation. must be a being which is pure actuality and that remains unmoved (otherwise it would be another link in the chain) Ginal cause of the universe and the final cause of our movement is just like a cat is drawn to a saucer of milk.

Question 44

Strengths of prime mover

Answer 44

infinite regression is quite improbableis due to phsycis being probelmsitic, not deterministic. If you shine each photon of light particles through a hole you can’t tell where each individual photon is going to end up. As all matter is on this level you cant run that backwards as will end up at different point each time, so infinite regression is most likely not possible

Question 45

Counter to prime mover

Answer 45

whilst this makes a valid point against infinite regression, it seems like an inductive leap of logic to go from their being movement in all things and no infinite chain of cause and effect, to a prime mover that we are all drawn towards. It lacks both validity and logic e.g. modern science claims that this chain of cause and effect is caused by the big bang which is observable through the expansion of space and the discovery of the CMB (cosmic microwavable background)