PJ, SMJ and Venue Flashcards
qualifications for QIR
1) suit not related to property
2) minimum contacts still required (Shaffer/Burnham)
what did Hertz bring to the table (1332)?
“nerve center” is where the corp. is incorporated or headquartered
4 traditional bases
1) tag jurisdiction (Burnham)
2) Agent served in forum (Hess)
3) Domicile (mas v. Perry)
4) consent (openly, willingly, intentionally, inadvertently, contractually) (Carnival, Hess)
what type of statutes can there be granting PJ?
1) long arm enumerated
2) constitutional max
what is a constitutional max statute?
wordy and general broad applicability of what is constitutionally allowed
when does 1367(c) allow courts to decline supp jur?
1) claim arise from a novel or complex issue of state law
2) claim substantially predominates over the claim over which the Dis. court has original jur
3) district ct has dismissed all claims over which it has original jur.
4) in exceptional circumstances (compelling reasons for declining jur) (never really allowed to be used)
what is a limited appearance?
D challenges QIR to defend interest in property
what did J. McIntyre bring to the table?
“selling a product through a third party is not sufficient to establish minimum contacts”
what did AFA tours bring to the table (1332)?
court MUST give P opportunity to prove that AIC is met. Case is still valid, even if the end damages are less than 75k
types of purposeful availment
1) unilateral act is not purposeful availment (Hanson)
2) If it’s a company calder effect test: as long as the contact was intentionally aimed and felt in the forum state it can exercise PJ over D
3) if it’s a company: stream of commerce (foreseeability that D would be haled into court)
what did World Wide bring to the table?
1) purposeful availment in the forum creates a reasonable anticipation that the D can be haled in to court.
2) sufficient interests of the P, D and state
what is the split in Asahi/McIntrye?
1) putting product into stream of commerce. Reasonable to anticipate product getting into other states
2) you need the above and an intent to serve in that state (ads, agents, employees)
when can multiple plaintiff NOT aggregate against 1 Def.?
if claims do NOT come from a single aggregated harm stemming from single undivided interest
what is a federal venue provision 1391(c)(3)
non US citizens can be sued in ANY judicial district and are disregarded if there are multiple def.
what are some challenges to SMJ?
1) domestic cases (family law is usually a state matter)
2) probate cases (Marshall v. Marshall)
what did helicoperteros bring to the table?
issue framed similarly to Perkins, but the outcome was the opposite (no PJ on the corp)
what are the rules of alienage jurisdiction?
1) a foreign citizen cannot invoke alienage jur. in a suit against another foreign citizen
2) a foreign citizen CAN invoke Alienage jur. if the suit also includes USC on both sides when they are foreign citizens on both sides
if you have high frequency of contact but low relation to forum what do you get?
questionable PJ
what are the 5 prongs of fundamental fairness from Worldwide and Asahi?
1) P’s interest (obtain convenient and effective relief)
2) D’s interest (litigation grossly inconvenient and unfair violating the 14th amendment (due process). Burden of proof (Asahi)
3) forum state’s interest (protecting residents)
4) Interstate interest (efficient resolution, witnesses, evidence)
5) share interest of state (Policy/Kulko)
examples of general jurisdiction
1) jurisdiction only over incorporation and principle place of business (HQ) (Daimler)
2) Place of tort is up to the state statute to decide (Gray, Goodyear)
1367
Supplemental jur
1391
Venue
if a case is filed laying venue in the wrong division or district what should happen?
it should be dismissed
under 1332, how is complete diversity between parties established?
state where parties are domiciled
what is the transferor?
court where is came from (OG)
what type of SMJ do federal courts have?
limited
characteristics of AIC (1332)
1) must be good faith (clear to legal certainty that P can’t recover what they’re demanding)
2) at time P files, they must be in good faith to be able to meet AIC
3) P getting less than they claimed is not a problem
when is a venue proper?
1) substantial part of claim arose 1391(b)(2)
2) anywhere where ALL def resides 1391(b)(1)
3) any jur where the D is subject to PJ 1391(b)(3)
(FALLBACK almost never applies b/c only applicable when no district in the US that will meet 1 and 2)